Literature DB >> 20219838

Changing and shielded magnetic fields suppress c-Fos expression in the navigation circuit: input from the magnetosensory system contributes to the internal representation of space in a subterranean rodent.

Tomás Burger1, Marcela Lucová, Regina E Moritz, Helmut H A Oelschläger, Rastislav Druga, Hynek Burda, Wolfgang Wiltschko, Roswitha Wiltschko, Pavel Nemec.   

Abstract

The neural substrate subserving magnetoreception and magnetic orientation in mammals is largely unknown. Previous experiments have demonstrated that the processing of magnetic sensory information takes place in the superior colliculus. Here, the effects of magnetic field conditions on neuronal activity in the rodent navigation circuit were assessed by quantifying c-Fos expression. Ansell's mole-rats (Fukomys anselli), a mammalian model to study the mechanisms of magnetic compass orientation, were subjected to natural, periodically changing, and shielded magnetic fields while exploring an unfamiliar circular arena. In the undisturbed local geomagnetic field, the exploration of the novel environment and/or nesting behaviour induced c-Fos expression throughout the head direction system and the entorhinal-hippocampal spatial representation system. This induction was significantly suppressed by exposure to periodically changing and/or shielded magnetic fields; discrete decreases in c-Fos were seen in the dorsal tegmental nucleus, the anterodorsal and the laterodorsal thalamic nuclei, the postsubiculum, the retrosplenial and entorhinal cortices, and the hippocampus. Moreover, in inactive animals, magnetic field intensity manipulation suppressed c-Fos expression in the CA1 and CA3 fields of the hippocampus and the dorsal subiculum, but induced expression in the polymorph layer of the dentate gyrus. These findings suggest that key constituents of the rodent navigation circuit contain populations of neurons responsive to magnetic stimuli. Thus, magnetic information may be integrated with multimodal sensory and motor information into a common spatial representation of allocentric space within this circuit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219838      PMCID: PMC2894883          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  81 in total

1.  Homing with locale, taxon, and dead reckoning strategies by foraging rats: sensory hierarchy in spatial navigation.

Authors:  H Maaswinkel; I Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  The anatomical and computational basis of the rat head-direction cell signal.

Authors:  P E Sharp; H T Blair; J Cho
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber).

Authors:  J Xiao; J B Levitt; R Buffenstein
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Exposure of postnatal rats to a static magnetic field of 0.14 T influences functional laterality of the hippocampal high-affinity choline uptake system in adulthood; in vitro test with magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Z Kristofiková; M Cermák; O Benesová; J Klaschka; P Zach
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat's recent experience.

Authors:  G J Quirk; R U Muller; J L Kubie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Basal expression of Fos, Fos-related, Jun, and Krox 24 proteins in rat hippocampus.

Authors:  P Hughes; P Lawlor; M Dragunow
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1992-05

7.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impaired long-term memory and NR2A-type NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in mice lacking c-Fos in the CNS.

Authors:  Alexander Fleischmann; Oivind Hvalby; Vidar Jensen; Tatyana Strekalova; Christiane Zacher; Liliana E Layer; Ane Kvello; Markus Reschke; Rainer Spanagel; Rolf Sprengel; Erwin F Wagner; Peter Gass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Novel spatial arrangements of familiar visual stimuli promote activity in the rat hippocampal formation but not the parahippocampal cortices: a c-fos expression study.

Authors:  T A Jenkins; E Amin; J M Pearce; M W Brown; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids.

Authors:  Caswell Barry; Robin Hayman; Neil Burgess; Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Mikko Herrala; Jukka Luukkonen; Jonne Naarala; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Odours stimulate neuronal activity in the dorsolateral area of the hippocampal formation during path integration.

Authors:  P E Jorge; J B Phillips; A Gonçalves; P A M Marques; P Nĕmec
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Biological effects of the hypomagnetic field: An analytical review of experiments and theories.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Frank S Prato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Are stress responses to geomagnetic storms mediated by the cryptochrome compass system?

Authors:  James Close
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Spontaneous expression of magnetic compass orientation in an epigeic rodent: the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus.

Authors:  Ludmila Oliveriusová; Pavel Němec; Zuzana Pavelková; František Sedláček
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-10

6.  Eyes are essential for magnetoreception in a mammal.

Authors:  Kai R Caspar; Katrin Moldenhauer; Regina E Moritz; Pavel Němec; E Pascal Malkemper; Sabine Begall
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Rapid learning of magnetic compass direction by C57BL/6 mice in a 4-armed 'plus' water maze.

Authors:  John B Phillips; Paul W Youmans; Rachel Muheim; Kelly A Sloan; Lukas Landler; Michael S Painter; Christopher R Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cryptochromes and Hormone Signal Transduction under Near-Zero Magnetic Fields: New Clues to Magnetic Field Effects in a Rice Planthopper.

Authors:  Gui-Jun Wan; Wen-Jing Wang; Jing-Jing Xu; Quan-Feng Yang; Ming-Jiang Dai; Feng-Jiao Zhang; Gregory A Sword; Wei-Dong Pan; Fa-Jun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Magnetoreception in laboratory mice: sensitivity to extremely low-frequency fields exceeds 33 nT at 30 Hz.

Authors:  Frank S Prato; Dawn Desjardins-Holmes; Lynn D Keenliside; Janice M DeMoor; John A Robertson; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Extracellular recordings reveal absence of magneto sensitive units in the avian optic tectum.

Authors:  Edgardo Ramírez; Gonzalo Marín; Jorge Mpodozis; Juan-Carlos Letelier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.