Literature DB >> 24912913

Identification of process measures to reduce postoperative readmission.

Amy L Halverson1, Morgan M Sellers, Karl Y Bilimoria, Mary T Hawn, Mark V Williams, Robin S McLeod, Clifford Y Ko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Readmission rates after intestinal surgery have been notably high, ranging from 10 % for elective surgery to 21 % for urgent/emergent surgery. Other than adherence to established strategies for decreasing individual postoperative complications, there is little guidance available for providers to work toward reducing their postoperative readmission rates. STUDY
DESIGN: Processes of care that may affect postoperative readmissions were identified through a systematic literature review, assessment of existing guidelines, and semi-structured interviews with individuals who have expertise in hospital readmissions and surgical quality improvement. Eleven experts ranked potential process measures for validity on the basis of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology.
RESULTS: Of 49 proposed process measures, 34 (69 %) were rated as valid. Of the 34 valid measures, two measures addressed care in the preoperative period. These included evaluation of patient's comorbidities, providing written instruction detailing the anticipated perioperative course, and communication with the patient's referring or primary care doctor. A measure addressing perioperative care stated that institutions should have a standardized perioperative care protocol. Additional measures focused on discharge instructions and communication.
CONCLUSIONS: An expert panel identified several aspects of care that are considered essential to quality patient care and important to reducing postoperative readmissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24912913     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2429-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  58 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Robin High; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

Authors:  Stephen F Jencks; Mark V Williams; Eric A Coleman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers.

Authors:  R H Brook; E A McGlynn; P G Shekelle
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Increased experience and surgical technique lead to improved outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  E D Kennedy; D M Rothwell; Z Cohen; R S McLeod
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation.

Authors:  Evangelos Messaris; Rishabh Sehgal; Susan Deiling; Walter A Koltun; David Stewart; Kevin McKenna; Lisa S Poritz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Does preoperative immunosuppression influence unplanned hospital readmission after surgery in patients with Crohn's disease?

Authors:  Evan C White; Gil Y Melmed; Eric Vasiliauskas; Marla Dubinsky; Andrew Ippoliti; Dermot McGovern; Stephan Targan; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Colorectal clinical pathways: a method of improving clinical outcome?

Authors:  Jane J Y Tan; Angel Y Z Foo; Denis M O Cheong
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.767

8.  Public reporting of discharge planning and rates of readmissions.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates.

Authors:  Deborah Nagle; Therese Pare; Emily Keenan; Kristin Marcet; Steven Tizio; Vitaliy Poylin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs.

Authors:  Andre da Luz Moreira; Ravi P Kiran; Hasan T Kirat; Feza H Remzi; Daniel P Geisler; James M Church; Thomas Garofalo; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Development of Quality Indicators for Endoscopic Eradication Therapies in Barrett's Esophagus: The TREAT-BE (Treatment With Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett's Esophagus) Consortium.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; V Raman Muthusamy; Nicholas J Shaheen; Rena Yadlapati; Robert Wilson; Julian A Abrams; Jacques Bergman; Amitabh Chak; Kenneth Chang; Ananya Das; John Dumot; Steven A Edmundowicz; Glenn Eisen; Gary W Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Lauren Gerson; Gregory G Ginsberg; David Grande; Matt Hall; Ben Harnke; John Inadomi; Janusz Jankowski; Charles J Lightdale; Jitin Makker; Robert D Odze; Oliver Pech; Richard E Sampliner; Stuart Spechler; George Triadafilopoulos; Michael B Wallace; Kenneth Wang; Irving Waxman; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in thoracic surgery, do they end at discharge?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Maria Aymerich
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

4.  Development of quality measures for the care of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Andrew J Gawron; Karl Bilimoria; Rajesh N Keswani; Kerry B Dunbar; Peter J Kahrilas; Philip Katz; Joel Richter; Felice Schnoll-Sussman; Nathaniel Soper; Marcelo F Vela; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Discharge decision-making after complex surgery: Surgeon behaviors compared to predictive modeling to reduce surgical readmissions.

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Vjollca Sadiraj; James C Cox; Xiaoxue Sherry Gao; Timothy M Pawlik; Kurt E Schnier; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Patterns of Hospital Performance on the Hospital-Wide 30-Day Readmission Metric: Is the Playing Field Level?

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; William V Padula; Daniel J Brotman; Natalie Reid; Curtis Leung; Diane Lepley; Amy Deutschendorf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.