Literature DB >> 16703449

Increased experience and surgical technique lead to improved outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a population-based study.

E D Kennedy1, D M Rothwell, Z Cohen, R S McLeod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether changes in length of stay and 30-day readmission, reoperation, and excision rates for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis occurred over time and with changes in surgical technique and hospital volume.
METHODS: Using three population-based administrative databases, data on all ileal pouch-anal anastomoses performed in the province of Ontario between January 1992 and June 1998 were obtained. The effect of age, gender, stage of the procedure, year of surgery, and hospital volume were examined for their effect on length of stay and readmission, reoperation, and excision rates.
RESULTS: There were 1,285 ileal pouch-anal anastomoses performed in 58 hospitals. There was a significant decrease in length of stay and reoperation and excision rates but a concommitant increase in readmission rate during the study period. Patients younger than aged 40 years had a significantly lower length of stay and excision rate. Patients who had a two-stage procedure had a shorter length of stay, readmission, and reoperative rate compared with those having a three-stage procedure. Hospital volume was a significant predictor of need for reoperation and excision with both low-volume and medium-volume hospitals having significantly higher rates than high-volume hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has improved. It is significantly better in patients younger than aged 40 years, having a two-stage procedure, and where surgery is performed at high-volume hospitals. It is likely that both modifications in surgical technique and surgical experience have led to improvements in clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16703449     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0521-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  Identification of process measures to reduce postoperative readmission.

Authors:  Amy L Halverson; Morgan M Sellers; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mary T Hawn; Mark V Williams; Robin S McLeod; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a Canadian institution's experience.

Authors:  E Zittan; Grace W Ma; N Wong-Chong; R Milgrom; R S McLeod; M Silverberg; Z Cohen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Transabdominal re-do pouch surgery in pediatric patients for failed ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a case matched study.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Eren Esen; H Hande Aydinli; Hasan T Kirat; David M Schwartzberg; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Comparable perioperative outcomes, long-term outcomes, and quality of life in a retrospective analysis of ulcerative colitis patients following 2-stage versus 3-stage proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Grace C Lee; Sarah E Deery; Hiroko Kunitake; Caitlin W Hicks; Adriana G Olariu; Lieba R Savitt; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Rocco Ricciardi; Richard A Hodin; Liliana G Bordeianou
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Risk of cancer and secondary proctectomy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  L Koskenvuo; L Renkonen-Sinisalo; H J Järvinen; A Lepistö
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Optimising the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit to Improve Quality of Care: Expert Recommendations.

Authors:  Edouard Louis; Iris Dotan; Subrata Ghosh; Liat Mlynarsky; Catherine Reenaers; Stefan Schreiber
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 9.071

7.  Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.

Authors:  Zubair Bayat; Keegan Guidolin; Basheer Elsolh; Charmaine De Castro; Erin Kennedy; Anand Govindarajan
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-09-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.