OBJECTIVE: Clinical pathways are intended to improve the quality of care. In March 2001, our unit implemented a pathway for patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess its impact on the quality of patient care. METHODS: We reviewed 204 patients managed using this pathway in 2001, and compared their outcomes with those of a control group of 204 patients who had undergone similar procedures the year before. The endpoints measured were postoperative morbidity, length of stay and readmission rates. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in terms of patient demographics, diagnosis, and nature of surgery performed. In the study group, 61% of patients underwent elective surgery compared with 62% in the control group. The incidence of postoperative morbidity in the study group was 20% compared with 33% in the control group (p = 0.003). The rate of readmission as a result of surgical complications was 6% in the study group versus 13% in the control group (p = 0.029). The average length of stay was 10.4 days in the study group and 12.1 days in the control group (p = 0.105). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a colorectal clinical pathway significantly improved the outcome of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical pathways are intended to improve the quality of care. In March 2001, our unit implemented a pathway for patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess its impact on the quality of patient care. METHODS: We reviewed 204 patients managed using this pathway in 2001, and compared their outcomes with those of a control group of 204 patients who had undergone similar procedures the year before. The endpoints measured were postoperative morbidity, length of stay and readmission rates. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in terms of patient demographics, diagnosis, and nature of surgery performed. In the study group, 61% of patients underwent elective surgery compared with 62% in the control group. The incidence of postoperative morbidity in the study group was 20% compared with 33% in the control group (p = 0.003). The rate of readmission as a result of surgical complications was 6% in the study group versus 13% in the control group (p = 0.029). The average length of stay was 10.4 days in the study group and 12.1 days in the control group (p = 0.105). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a colorectal clinical pathway significantly improved the outcome of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.
Authors: Markus K Müller; Konstantin J Dedes; Daniel Dindo; Stefan Steiner; Dieter Hahnloser; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Amy L Halverson; Morgan M Sellers; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mary T Hawn; Mark V Williams; Robin S McLeod; Clifford Y Ko Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: J W T Dekker; C B M van den Broek; E Bastiaannet; L G M van de Geest; R A E M Tollenaar; G J Liefers Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 5.344