Literature DB >> 24912106

Prognostic subgroups for citalopram response in the STAR*D trial.

Ewgeni Jakubovski1, Michael H Bloch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few data exist to help clinicians predict likelihood of treatment response in individual patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Our aim was to identify subgroups of MDD patients with differential treatment outcomes based on presenting clinical characteristics. We also sought to quantify the likelihood of treatment success based on the degree of improvement and side effects after 2 and 4 weeks of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) pharmacotherapy.
METHOD: We analyzed data from the first treatment phase of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial, in which subjects with a DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD were treated for 8-14 weeks with open-label citalopram. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine homogenous subgroups with different rates of response and remission in depressive symptoms. Included predictor variables were initial clinical characteristics, initial improvement, and side effects after 2 and 4 weeks of SSRI treatment. The primary outcome measures were treatment response (defined as a greater than 50% reduction in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS-17] score from baseline) and remission (defined as an HDRS-17 score ≤ 17).
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were able to identify subgroups from a low likelihood of response of 18% (income < $10,000, comorbid generalized anxiety disorder, < 16 years of education; P < .01) to a high likelihood of response of 68% (income ≥ $40,000, no comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder; P < .01). Among baseline clinical characteristics, employment status (N = 2,477; χ²₁ = 78.1; P < .001) and income level (N = 2,512; χ²₁ = 77.7; P < .001) were the most informative in predicting treatment outcome. For the models at weeks 2 and 4, treatment success was best predicted by early symptom improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic data such as low income, education, and unemployment were most discriminative in predicting a poor response to citalopram, even with disparities in access to care accounted for. This finding implies that socioeconomic factors may be more useful predictors of medication response than traditional psychiatric diagnoses or past treatment history. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00021528. © Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24912106      PMCID: PMC4471174          DOI: 10.4088/JCP.13m08727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  28 in total

1.  Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness.

Authors:  M Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  1967-12

2.  Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  E F Cook; L Goldman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

3.  A self-report scale to help make psychiatric diagnoses: the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  M Zimmerman; J I Mattia
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08

4.  Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  The Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire: development, reliability and validity.

Authors:  M Zimmerman; J I Mattia
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 6.  Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Harold A Sackeim; Frederic M Quitkin; Steven Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2003-06

7.  The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.

Authors:  A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Hicham M Ibrahim; Thomas J Carmody; Bruce Arnow; Daniel N Klein; John C Markowitz; Philip T Ninan; Susan Kornstein; Rachel Manber; Michael E Thase; James H Kocsis; Martin B Keller
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02

9.  Socio-economic mobility among patients with schizophrenia or major affective disorder. A 17-year retrospective follow-up.

Authors:  S Aro; H Aro; I Keskimäki
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Lorant; D Deliège; W Eaton; A Robert; P Philippot; M Ansseau
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  27 in total

1.  Anxious and non-anxious major depressive disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

Authors:  R C Kessler; N A Sampson; P Berglund; M J Gruber; A Al-Hamzawi; L Andrade; B Bunting; K Demyttenaere; S Florescu; G de Girolamo; O Gureje; Y He; C Hu; Y Huang; E Karam; V Kovess-Masfety; S Lee; D Levinson; M E Medina Mora; J Moskalewicz; Y Nakamura; F Navarro-Mateu; M A Oakley Browne; M Piazza; J Posada-Villa; T Slade; M Ten Have; Y Torres; G Vilagut; M Xavier; Z Zarkov; V Shahly; M A Wilcox
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  Predictors of Poor Response to Depression Treatment in Primary Care.

Authors:  Rebecca C Rossom; Leif I Solberg; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Robin R Whitebird; A Lauren Crain; Arne Beck; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Predictors of anxiety recurrence in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) trial.

Authors:  Jerome H Taylor; Ewgeni Jakubovski; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 4.  Epigenetic and Neural Circuitry Landscape of Psychotherapeutic Interventions.

Authors:  Christopher W T Miller
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2017-05-25

5.  Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in a Community Health Setting.

Authors:  Seth Feuerstein; Sarah E Hodges; Brian Keenaghan; Andrew Bessette; Erica Forselius; Peter T Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Early Improvement in Work Productivity Predicts Future Clinical Course in Depressed Outpatients: Findings From the CO-MED Trial.

Authors:  Manish K Jha; Abu Minhajuddin; Tracy L Greer; Thomas Carmody; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Depression Trajectories during the First Year after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Charles H Bombardier; Trynke Hoekstra; Sureyya Dikmen; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Anxiety Disorder-Specific Predictors of Treatment Outcome in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) Trial.

Authors:  Ewgeni Jakubovski; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2016-09

9.  Pretreatment Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Theta Activity in Relation to Symptom Improvement in Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Diego A Pizzagalli; Christian A Webb; Daniel G Dillon; Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Franziska Goer; Maurizio Fava; Patrick McGrath; Myrna Weissman; Ramin Parsey; Phil Adams; Joseph Trombello; Crystal Cooper; Patricia Deldin; Maria A Oquendo; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas Carmody; Gerard Bruder; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 21.596

10.  Personalized prediction of antidepressant v. placebo response: evidence from the EMBARC study.

Authors:  Christian A Webb; Madhukar H Trivedi; Zachary D Cohen; Daniel G Dillon; Jay C Fournier; Franziska Goer; Maurizio Fava; Patrick J McGrath; Myrna Weissman; Ramin Parsey; Phil Adams; Joseph M Trombello; Crystal Cooper; Patricia Deldin; Maria A Oquendo; Melvin G McInnis; Quentin Huys; Gerard Bruder; Benji T Kurian; Manish Jha; Robert J DeRubeis; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.