Literature DB >> 29962359

Personalized prediction of antidepressant v. placebo response: evidence from the EMBARC study.

Christian A Webb1, Madhukar H Trivedi2, Zachary D Cohen3, Daniel G Dillon1, Jay C Fournier4, Franziska Goer1, Maurizio Fava5, Patrick J McGrath6, Myrna Weissman6, Ramin Parsey7, Phil Adams6, Joseph M Trombello2, Crystal Cooper2, Patricia Deldin8, Maria A Oquendo3, Melvin G McInnis8, Quentin Huys9, Gerard Bruder6, Benji T Kurian2, Manish Jha2, Robert J DeRubeis3, Diego A Pizzagalli1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly heterogeneous condition in terms of symptom presentation and, likely, underlying pathophysiology. Accordingly, it is possible that only certain individuals with MDD are well-suited to antidepressants. A potentially fruitful approach to parsing this heterogeneity is to focus on promising endophenotypes of depression, such as neuroticism, anhedonia, and cognitive control deficits.
METHODS: Within an 8-week multisite trial of sertraline v. placebo for depressed adults (n = 216), we examined whether the combination of machine learning with a Personalized Advantage Index (PAI) can generate individualized treatment recommendations on the basis of endophenotype profiles coupled with clinical and demographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Five pre-treatment variables moderated treatment response. Higher depression severity and neuroticism, older age, less impairment in cognitive control, and being employed were each associated with better outcomes to sertraline than placebo. Across 1000 iterations of a 10-fold cross-validation, the PAI model predicted that 31% of the sample would exhibit a clinically meaningful advantage [post-treatment Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) difference ⩾3] with sertraline relative to placebo. Although there were no overall outcome differences between treatment groups (d = 0.15), those identified as optimally suited to sertraline at pre-treatment had better week 8 HRSD scores if randomized to sertraline (10.7) than placebo (14.7) (d = 0.58).
CONCLUSIONS: A subset of MDD patients optimally suited to sertraline can be identified on the basis of pre-treatment characteristics. This model must be tested prospectively before it can be used to inform treatment selection. However, findings demonstrate the potential to improve individual outcomes through algorithm-guided treatment recommendations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidepressant; depression; endophenotype; machine learning; placebo; precision medicine; prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29962359      PMCID: PMC6314923          DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718001708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  71 in total

1.  MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data.

Authors:  Daniel J Stekhoven; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Clinical trial methodology and drug-placebo differences.

Authors:  Irving Kirsch
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Empirically derived criteria cast doubt on the clinical significance of antidepressant-placebo differences.

Authors:  Joanna Moncrieff; Irving Kirsch
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Treatment Selection in Depression.

Authors:  Zachary D Cohen; Robert J DeRubeis
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Antidepressant switching patterns in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a General Practice Research Database (GPRD) Study.

Authors:  D Saragoussi; J Chollet; S Bineau; Y Chalem; D Milea
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; A John Rush; Jonathan E Alpert; G K Balasubramani; Stephen R Wisniewski; Cheryl N Carmin; Melanie M Biggs; Sidney Zisook; Andrew Leuchter; Robert Howland; Diane Warden; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Euthymic patients with bipolar disorder show decreased reward learning in a probabilistic reward task.

Authors:  Diego A Pizzagalli; Elena Goetz; Michael Ostacher; Dan V Iosifescu; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Differential change in specific depressive symptoms during antidepressant medication or cognitive therapy.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon; Robert Gallop; Richard C Shelton; Jay D Amsterdam
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2013-04-12

9.  Antidepressant switching among adherent patients treated for depression.

Authors:  Steven C Marcus; Mariam Hassan; Mark Olfson
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Reference, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Atul R Mahableshwarkar; John Zajecka; William Jacobson; Yinzhong Chen; Richard S E Keefe
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  25 in total

1.  Individual Differences in Response to Antidepressants: A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marta M Maslej; Toshiaki A Furukawa; Andrea Cipriani; Paul W Andrews; Benoit H Mulsant
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Examining raphe-amygdala structural connectivity as a biological predictor of SSRI response.

Authors:  Rajapillai L I Pillai; Chuan Huang; Andrew LaBella; Mengru Zhang; Jie Yang; Madhukar Trivedi; Myrna Weissman; Patrick McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Benji Kurian; Crystal Cooper; Melvin McInnis; Maria A Oquendo; Diego A Pizzagalli; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Personalized prognostic prediction of treatment outcome for depressed patients in a naturalistic psychiatric hospital setting: A comparison of machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Christian A Webb; Zachary D Cohen; Courtney Beard; Marie Forgeard; Andrew D Peckham; Thröstur Björgvinsson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2020-01

4.  Pretreatment Reward Sensitivity and Frontostriatal Resting-State Functional Connectivity Are Associated With Response to Bupropion After Sertraline Nonresponse.

Authors:  Yuen-Siang Ang; Roselinde Kaiser; Thilo Deckersbach; Jorge Almeida; Mary L Phillips; Henry W Chase; Christian A Webb; Ramin Parsey; Maurizio Fava; Patrick McGrath; Myrna Weissman; Phil Adams; Patricia Deldin; Maria A Oquendo; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas Carmody; Gerard Bruder; Crystal M Cooper; Cherise R Chin Fatt; Madhukar H Trivedi; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Major Depressive Disorder in Older Patients as an Inflammatory Disorder: Implications for the Pharmacological Management of Geriatric Depression.

Authors:  Malcolm P Forbes; Adrienne O'Neil; Melissa Lane; Bruno Agustini; Nick Myles; Michael Berk
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Folk Classification and Factor Rotations: Whales, Sharks, and the Problems With the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).

Authors:  Gerald J Haeffel; Bertus F Jeronimus; Bonnie N Kaiser; Lesley Jo Weaver; Peter D Soyster; Aaron J Fisher; Ivan Vargas; Jason T Goodson; Wei Lu
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-05-18

7.  Learning Individualized Treatment Rules for Multiple-Domain Latent Outcomes.

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  The Two Cultures of Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Daniel Bennett; Steven M Silverstein; Yael Niv
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  Personalized prescriptions of therapeutic skills from patient characteristics: An ecological momentary assessment approach.

Authors:  Christian A Webb; Marie Forgeard; Elana S Israel; Nathaniel Lovell-Smith; Courtney Beard; Thröstur Björgvinsson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2021-04-08

10.  Explainable AI enables clinical trial patient selection to retrospectively improve treatment effects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Monika S Mellem; Matt Kollada; Jane Tiller; Thomas Lauritzen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.