Literature DB >> 18711071

Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.

Kurtis B Reed1, Mark D P Davis, Krystal Nakamura, Linda Hanson, Donna M Richardson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the results of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.
DESIGN: Retrospective medical chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent patch testing before or after metal device implantation.
INTERVENTIONS: Patch testing.
RESULTS: From January 1999 through March 2006, 44 patients underwent patch testing in conjunction with metal device implantation, 22 preoperatively and 22 postoperatively. The reason for preoperative patch testing was a history of allergy to metals. Five patients had positive results for a component of the proposed device. The reasons for postoperative patch testing were unexplained skin eruptions at the implantation site (13 patients), chronic joint pain (8 patients), and joint loosening (1 patient). None of the patients had positive patch test results to a component of the previously implanted device.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers of patients in this study were small, patch testing performed before metal device implantation was helpful in guiding the choice of device selected. Patch testing after implantation was of limited value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18711071     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.8.999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Systemic contact dermatitis and allergy to biomedical devices.

Authors:  Marcella Aquino; Tania Mucci
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  The association between metal allergy, total hip arthroplasty, and revision.

Authors:  Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kåre Engkilde; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Kjeld Søballe; Torkil Menné
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  A prospective study concerning the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yirong Zeng; Wenjun Feng; Jie Li; Lu Lu; Chuntao Ma; Jianchun Zeng; Feilong Li; Xinyu Qi; Yueguang Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Biomaterial hypersensitivity: is it real? Supportive evidence and approach considerations for metal allergic patients following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Mitchelson; Craig J Wilson; William M Mihalko; Thomas M Grupp; Blaine T Manning; Douglas A Dennis; Stuart B Goodman; Tony H Tzeng; Sonia Vasdev; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Metal Hypersensitivity Reactions to Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Wendy Z W Teo; Peter C Schalock
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2016-12-19

Review 7.  Implant allergy.

Authors:  P Thomas; B Summer
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

8.  Novel Nanoparticulate and Ionic Titanium Antigens for Hypersensitivity Testing.

Authors:  Paul Johan Høl; Einar K Kristoffersen; Nils Roar Gjerdet; Amanda S Pellowe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.