Literature DB >> 24909623

Development of a risk score to stratify symptomatic adults referred for colonoscopy.

Chee-Wei Law1, Sanjay Rampal, April C Roslani, Sanjiv Mahadeva.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: With an increasing burden on overstretched colonoscopy services, a simple risk score for significant pathology in symptomatic patients may aid in the prioritization of patients.
METHODS: A derivative study of a risk score model for colonic neoplasia (colorectal carcinoma [CRC] and advanced adenoma) and CRC alone was conducted in symptomatic adults referred for an index colonoscopy. The accuracy of the final model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.
RESULTS: A total of 1013 subjects (mean age 59.9 ± 13.7 years, 52.3% females) from a multi-ethnic Asian background (Chinese 56%, Malay 20.4%, Indian 21.5%) were recruited. Colonic neoplasia and CRC were identified in 175 (17.3%) and 114 (11.3%) cases, respectively. Risk scores were assigned to individual factors identified in a logistic regression model of both demographic (age, gender, ethnicity, education level, smoking history, Aspirin use) and clinical symptoms (change in bowel habit, bloody stool, weight loss, appetite loss, lethargy). The risk score for each patient was the sum of their individual risk factors. The AUC of the risk score for colonic neoplasia and CRC was 0.76 (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic of P = 0.745) and 0.83 (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic of P = 0.982), respectively.
CONCLUSION: A simple risk score for colonic neoplasia and CRC may be able to prioritize colonoscopy referrals in symptomatic subjects from a multi-ethnic background. A further study to validate this scoring system is required.
© 2014 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonic neoplasia; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; risk stratification; symptomatic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909623     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  6 in total

Review 1.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

2.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer-Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding.

Authors:  Nauzer Forbes; Mohan Cooray; Michael Hackett; Nishwa Shah; Yuhong Yuan; Pavel Antiperovitch; Tracey Corner; David Chan; Michael Mills; David Armstrong; Ted Xenodemetropoulos
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-22

4.  Predicting advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in a diverse population with the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer risk-assessment tool.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ashley Patel; Ajitha Mannalithara; Vandana Sundaram; Aya Mitani; Manisha Desai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Effect of aspirin on the diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test for colorectal advanced neoplasia.

Authors:  Luis Bujanda; Cristina Sarasqueta; Pablo Vega; María Salve; Enrique Quintero; Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Fernando Fernández-Bañares; Jaume Boadas; Rafel Campo; Ana Garayoa; Angel Ferrandez; Leyanira Torrealba; Daniel Rodríguez-Alcaide; Mauro D'Amato; Vicent Hernández; Joaquin Cubiella
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  The discriminatory capability of existing scores to predict advanced colorectal neoplasia: a prospective colonoscopy study of 5,899 screening participants.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Simpson Ng; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Sunny H Wong; Siew C Ng; Simon S M Ng; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.