Literature DB >> 27219715

Predicting advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in a diverse population with the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer risk-assessment tool.

Uri Ladabaum1,2, Ashley Patel1,2, Ajitha Mannalithara1,2, Vandana Sundaram2,3, Aya Mitani2,3, Manisha Desai2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tailoring screening to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk could improve screening effectiveness. Most CRCs arise from advanced neoplasia (AN) that dwells for years. To date, no available colorectal neoplasia risk score has been validated externally in a diverse population. The authors explored whether the National Cancer Institute (NCI) CRC risk-assessment tool, which was developed to predict future CRC risk, could predict current AN prevalence in a diverse population, thereby allowing its use in risk stratification for screening.
METHODS: This was a prospective examination of the relation between predicted 10-year CRC risk and the prevalence of AN, defined as advanced or multiple (≥3 adenomatous, ≥5 serrated) adenomatous or sessile serrated polyps, in individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Among 509 screenees (50% women; median age, 58 years; 61% white, 5% black, 10% Hispanic, and 24% Asian), 58 (11%) had AN. The prevalence of AN increased progressively from 6% in the lowest risk-score quintile to 17% in the highest risk-score quintile (P = .002). Risk-score distributions in individuals with versus without AN differed significantly (median, 1.38 [0.90-1.87] vs 1.02 [0.62-1.57], respectively; P = .003), with substantial overlap. The discriminatory accuracy of the tool was modest, with areas under the curve of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.69) overall, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.49-0.70) for women, and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.53-0.73) for men. The results did not change substantively when the analysis was restricted to adenomatous lesions or to screening procedures without any additional incidental indication.
CONCLUSIONS: The NCI CRC risk-assessment tool displays modest discriminatory accuracy in predicting AN at screening colonoscopy in a diverse population. This tool may aid shared decision-making in clinical practice. Cancer 2016.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2663-2670. © 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colon cancer; early detection; prediction; risk-stratification; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27219715      PMCID: PMC5526625          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  41 in total

1.  Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Mary Jane Esplen; Steven Gallinger; John R McLaughlin; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

Authors:  Paul Hewitson; Paul Glasziou; Eila Watson; Bernie Towler; Les Irwig
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

4.  The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects.

Authors:  Khay-Guan Yeoh; Khek-Yu Ho; Han-Mo Chiu; Feng Zhu; Jessica Y L Ching; Deng-Chyang Wu; Takahisa Matsuda; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Sang-Kil Lee; Khean-Lee Goh; Jose Sollano; Rungsun Rerknimitr; Rupert Leong; Kelvin Tsoi; Jaw-Town Lin; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: a theory-based model.

Authors:  Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat; Man Hung; Shirley D Hon; Philip Tang; Lisa M Pappas; Randall W Burt; Marc D Schwartz; Antoinette M Stroup; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

7.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Theodore R Levin; Philip Lavin; Graham P Lidgard; David A Ahlquist; Barry M Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Development of a risk score for colorectal cancer in men.

Authors:  Jane A Driver; J Michael Gaziano; Rebecca P Gelber; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring; Tobias Kurth
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  A score to estimate the likelihood of detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Marcin Polkowski; Ewa Kraszewska; Maciej Rupinski; Eugeniusz Butruk; Jaroslaw Regula
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  B Joseph Elmunzer; Rodney A Hayward; Philip S Schoenfeld; Sameer D Saini; Amar Deshpande; Akbar K Waljee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.

Authors:  J M Cairns; S Greenley; O Bamidele; D Weller
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.532

2.  Exploring a novel method for optimising the implementation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction tool into primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shakira Milton; Jon D Emery; Jane Rinaldi; Joanne Kinder; Adrian Bickerstaffe; Sibel Saya; Mark A Jenkins; Jennifer McIntosh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.960

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options.

Authors:  Iyad A Issa; Malak Noureddine
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Risk Scores for Predicting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in the Average-risk Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Le Peng; Korbinian Weigl; Daniel Boakye; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

Authors:  Madhav Desai; Joseph C Anderson; Michael Kaminski; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Jihan Fathallah; Cesare Hassan; David Lieberman; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-04-13

6.  SEPT9 and SHOX2 DNA methylation status and its utility in the diagnosis of colonic adenomas and colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Alexander Semaan; Anne van Ellen; Sebastian Meller; Dominik Bergheim; Vittorio Branchi; Philipp Lingohr; Diane Goltz; Jörg C Kalff; Glen Kristiansen; Hanno Matthaei; Dimitrios Pantelis; Dimo Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.551

7.  Advanced neoplasia in Veterans at screening colonoscopy using the National Cancer Institute Risk Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Laura W Musselwhite; Thomas S Redding; Kellie J Sims; Meghan C O'Leary; Elizabeth R Hauser; Terry Hyslop; Ziad F Gellad; Brian A Sullivan; David Lieberman; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Risk prediction rule for advanced neoplasia on screening colonoscopy for average-risk individuals.

Authors:  Ala I Sharara; Ali El Mokahal; Ali H Harb; Natalia Khalaf; Fayez S Sarkis; Mustapha M El-Halabi; Nabil M Mansour; Ahmad Malli; Robert Habib
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Assessing Presenting Symptoms, Co-Morbidities, and Risk Factors for Mortality in Underserved Patients With Non-Hereditary Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shravani Reddy; Awf Mouchli; Lindsey Bierle; Miranda Gerrard; Chirstopher Walsh; Adil Mir; David P Lebel; Christopher Mason; Douglas Grider; Marrieth Rubio
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-07-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.