Literature DB >> 24909340

The mortality risk of expectant management compared with delivery stratified by gestational age and race and ethnicity.

Melissa G Rosenstein1, Jonathan M Snowden2, Yvonne W Cheng3, Aaron B Caughey2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the mortality risk of expectant management with the risk of delivery at each week of term pregnancy in 4 racial/ethnic groups. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all nonanomalous, term deliveries in California from 1997 to 2006 among white, black, Hispanic, and Asian women. In each racial/ethnic group, we compared the risk of infant death at each week with a composite risk representing the mortality risk of 1 week of expectant management.
RESULTS: The risk of stillbirth and infant death is highest in black women (stillbirth risk: 18.0 per 10,000, infant death: 24.4 per 10,000, compared with 9.4 per 10,000 and 10.8 per 10,000 in white women, respectively; P < .001). Although absolute risks differ by race/ethnicity, the composite risk of expectant management does not surpass the risk of delivery until 39 weeks in any group. At 39 weeks these absolute risk differences are low, however, with a number needed to deliver to prevent 1 death ranging from 751 (among black women) to 2587 (among Asian women).
CONCLUSION: The mortality risk of expectant management exceeds the risk of delivery at 39 weeks in all racial/ethnic groups, despite variation in absolute risks.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expectant management; mortality risk; race/ethnicity; stillbirth

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909340      PMCID: PMC4252751          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  G C Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.

Authors:  David A Savitz; James W Terry; Nancy Dole; John M Thorp; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Chia-Wen Ko; Marian Willinger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system.

Authors:  Bryan T Oshiro; Erick Henry; Janie Wilson; D Ware Branch; Michael W Varner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records.

Authors:  Michelle Pearl; Megan L Wier; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Ethnic differences in neonatal and postneonatal mortality.

Authors:  Nancy A Hessol; Elena Fuentes-Afflick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation?

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; James M Nicholson; Sanae Nakagawa; Tim A Bruckner; A Eugene Washington; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.

Authors:  Patricia M Dietz; Lucinda J England; William M Callaghan; Michelle Pearl; Megan L Wier; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 9.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes and labour and delivery-related charges among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  I Akobirshoev; M Mitra; S L Parish; T A Moore Simas; R Dembo; C N Ncube
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2018-12-21

2.  Defining Abnormal Fetal Growth and Perinatal Risk: Population or Customized Standards?

Authors:  Sarah J Stock; Jenny Myers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Optimal Timing of Delivery Based on the Risk of Stillbirth and Infant Death Associated with Each Additional Week of Expectant Management in Multiple Pregnancies: a National Cohort Study of Koreans.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Ko; Sae Kyung Choi; Jeong Ha Wie; In Yang Park; Yong Gyu Park; Jong Chul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Optimal time of delivery to reduce the risk of infant mortality in small and normally grown fetuses: A national cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Ko; Jeong Ha Wie; Sae Kyung Choi; In Yang Park; Yong-Gyu Park; Jong Chul Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.

Authors:  Rachel G Sinkey; Jasmin Lacevic; Tea Reljic; Iztok Hozo; Kelly S Gibson; Anthony O Odibo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.