Bryan T Oshiro1, Erick Henry, Janie Wilson, D Ware Branch, Michael W Varner. 1. From the Women & Newborn Clinical Integration Program, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended that elective deliveries not be performed before 39 weeks of gestation, to minimize prematurity-related neonatal complications. Because a worrisome number of elective deliveries were occurring before 39 weeks of gestation in our system, we developed and implemented a program to decrease the number of these early term elective deliveries. Secondary objectives were to monitor relevant clinical outcomes. METHODS: The electronic medical records of an integrated health care system involving nine labor and delivery units in Utah were queried to establish the incidence of patients admitted for elective induction of labor or planned elective cesarean delivery. These facilities have open staff models with obstetricians, family practitioners, and certified nurse midwives. Guidelines were developed and implemented to discourage early term elective deliveries. The prevalence of early term elective deliveries was tracked and reported back regularly to the obstetric leadership and obstetric departments at each facility. RESULTS: The baseline prevalence of early term elective deliveries was 28% of all elective deliveries before the initiation of the program. Within 6 months of initiating the program, the incidence of near-term elective deliveries decreased to less than 10% and after 6 years continues to be less than 3%. A reduced length of stay in labor and delivery occurred with the introduction of the program, and there were no adverse effects on secondary clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: With institutional commitment, it is possible to substantially reduce and sustain a decline in the incidence of elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
OBJECTIVE: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended that elective deliveries not be performed before 39 weeks of gestation, to minimize prematurity-related neonatal complications. Because a worrisome number of elective deliveries were occurring before 39 weeks of gestation in our system, we developed and implemented a program to decrease the number of these early term elective deliveries. Secondary objectives were to monitor relevant clinical outcomes. METHODS: The electronic medical records of an integrated health care system involving nine labor and delivery units in Utah were queried to establish the incidence of patients admitted for elective induction of labor or planned elective cesarean delivery. These facilities have open staff models with obstetricians, family practitioners, and certified nurse midwives. Guidelines were developed and implemented to discourage early term elective deliveries. The prevalence of early term elective deliveries was tracked and reported back regularly to the obstetric leadership and obstetric departments at each facility. RESULTS: The baseline prevalence of early term elective deliveries was 28% of all elective deliveries before the initiation of the program. Within 6 months of initiating the program, the incidence of near-term elective deliveries decreased to less than 10% and after 6 years continues to be less than 3%. A reduced length of stay in labor and delivery occurred with the introduction of the program, and there were no adverse effects on secondary clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: With institutional commitment, it is possible to substantially reduce and sustain a decline in the incidence of elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: James W Schroeder; Karen N Conneely; Joseph C Cubells; Varun Kilaru; D Jeffrey Newport; Bettina T Knight; Zachary N Stowe; Patricia A Brennan; Julia Krushkal; Frances A Tylavsky; Robert N Taylor; Ronald M Adkins; Alicia K Smith Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Kelly Yamasato; Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Marguerite Bartholomew; Marsha Durbin; Chieko Kimata; Bliss Kaneshiro Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2016-12
Authors: Jennifer L Richards; Michael S Kramer; Paromita Deb-Rinker; Jocelyn Rouleau; Laust Mortensen; Mika Gissler; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Rolv Skjærven; Sven Cnattingius; Stefan Johansson; Marie Delnord; Siobhan M Dolan; Naho Morisaki; Suzanne Tough; Jennifer Zeitlin; Michael R Kramer Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 56.272