Literature DB >> 24908424

Genomic classification of the RAS network identifies a personalized treatment strategy for lung cancer.

Nader N El-Chaar1, Stephen R Piccolo2, Kenneth M Boucher3, Adam L Cohen4, Jeffrey T Chang5, Philip J Moos6, Andrea H Bild7.   

Abstract

Better approaches are needed to evaluate a single patient's drug response at the genomic level. Targeted therapy for signaling pathways in cancer has met limited success in part due to the exceedingly interwoven nature of the pathways. In particular, the highly complex RAS network has been challenging to target. Effectively targeting the pathway requires development of techniques that measure global network activity to account for pathway complexity. For this purpose, we used a gene-expression-based biomarker for RAS network activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, and screened for drugs whose efficacy was significantly highly correlated to RAS network activity. Results identified EGFR and MEK co-inhibition as the most effective treatment for RAS-active NSCLC amongst a panel of over 360 compounds and fractions. RAS activity was identified in both RAS-mutant and wild-type lines, indicating broad characterization of RAS signaling inclusive of multiple mechanisms of RAS activity, and not solely based on mutation status. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that co-inhibition of EGFR and MEK induced apoptosis and blocked both EGFR-RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK and EGFR-PI3K-AKT-RPS6 nodes simultaneously in RAS-active, but not RAS-inactive NSCLC. These results provide a comprehensive strategy to personalize treatment of NSCLC based on RAS network dysregulation and provide proof-of-concept of a genomic approach to classify and target complex signaling networks.
Copyright © 2014 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Genomics; Individualized medicine; Networks; RAS; Signaling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24908424      PMCID: PMC4450766          DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


  71 in total

1.  The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Harold J Burstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Dirk Schadendorf; Carola Berking; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Carla Ml van Herpen; Paola Queirolo; Christian U Blank; Axel Hauschild; J Thaddeus Beck; Annie St-Pierre; Faiz Niazi; Simon Wandel; Malte Peters; Angela Zubel; Reinhard Dummer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles.

Authors:  M West; C Blanchette; H Dressman; E Huang; S Ishida; R Spang; H Zuzan; J A Olson; J R Marks; J R Nevins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tony S Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Sumitra Thongprasert; Chih-Hsin Yang; Da-Tong Chu; Nagahiro Saijo; Patrapim Sunpaweravong; Baohui Han; Benjamin Margono; Yukito Ichinose; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Yuichiro Ohe; Jin-Ji Yang; Busyamas Chewaskulyong; Haiyi Jiang; Emma L Duffield; Claire L Watkins; Alison A Armour; Masahiro Fukuoka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gregory J Riely; Jenifer Marks; William Pao
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-04-15

6.  Network analysis of oncogenic Ras activation in cancer.

Authors:  Edward C Stites; Paul C Trampont; Zhong Ma; Kodi S Ravichandran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  RAS/ERK signaling promotes site-specific ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation via RSK and stimulates cap-dependent translation.

Authors:  Philippe P Roux; David Shahbazian; Hieu Vu; Marina K Holz; Michael S Cohen; Jack Taunton; Nahum Sonenberg; John Blenis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A genomic strategy to elucidate modules of oncogenic pathway signaling networks.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Chang; Carlos Carvalho; Seiichi Mori; Andrea H Bild; Michael L Gatza; Quanli Wang; Joseph E Lucas; Anil Potti; Phillip G Febbo; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Identification and characterization of a novel chemotype MEK inhibitor able to alter the phosphorylation state of MEK1/2.

Authors:  Takayuki Yoshida; Junya Kakegawa; Takayuki Yamaguchi; Yoshiji Hantani; Nobuyuki Okajima; Toshiyuki Sakai; Yoshihiro Watanabe; Motonao Nakamura
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2012-12

10.  Network quantification of EGFR signaling unveils potential for targeted combination therapy.

Authors:  Bertram Klinger; Anja Sieber; Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther; Franziska Witzel; Leanne Berry; Dirk Schumacher; Yibing Yan; Pawel Durek; Mark Merchant; Reinhold Schäfer; Christine Sers; Nils Blüthgen
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genomic classification of the RAS network identifies a personalized treatment strategy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Nader N El-Chaar; Stephen R Piccolo; Kenneth M Boucher; Adam L Cohen; Jeffrey T Chang; Philip J Moos; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  The value of genomics in dissecting the RAS-network and in guiding therapeutics for RAS-driven cancers.

Authors:  Gajendra Shrestha; Shelley M MacNeil; Jasmine A McQuerry; David F Jenkins; Sunil Sharma; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Inferring pathway dysregulation in cancers from multiple types of omic data.

Authors:  Shelley M MacNeil; William E Johnson; Dean Y Li; Stephen R Piccolo; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Activity of distinct growth factor receptor network components in breast tumors uncovers two biologically relevant subtypes.

Authors:  Mumtahena Rahman; Shelley M MacNeil; David F Jenkins; Gajendra Shrestha; Sydney R Wyatt; Jasmine A McQuerry; Stephen R Piccolo; Laura M Heiser; Joe W Gray; W Evan Johnson; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  In pursuit of synergy: An investigation of the PI3K/mTOR/MEK co-targeted inhibition strategy in NSCLC.

Authors:  Susan Heavey; Sinead Cuffe; Stephen Finn; Vincent Young; Ronan Ryan; Siobhan Nicholson; Niamh Leonard; Niall McVeigh; Martin Barr; Kenneth O'Byrne; Kathy Gately
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 6.  Receptor tyrosine kinases and downstream pathways as druggable targets for cancer treatment: the current arsenal of inhibitors.

Authors:  Wagner Ricardo Montor; Andrei Ronaldo Oliveira Silva Escartin Salas; Fabiana Henriques Machado de Melo
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Using Regularization to Infer Cell Line Specificity in Logical Network Models of Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Sébastien De Landtsheer; Philippe Lucarelli; Thomas Sauter
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Transcriptome profiling reveals Silibinin dose-dependent response network in non-small lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Jagan Mohan Kaipa; Vytaute Starkuviene; Holger Erfle; Roland Eils; Evgeny Gladilin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.