Literature DB >> 27338857

The value of genomics in dissecting the RAS-network and in guiding therapeutics for RAS-driven cancers.

Gajendra Shrestha1, Shelley M MacNeil2, Jasmine A McQuerry2, David F Jenkins3, Sunil Sharma4, Andrea H Bild5.   

Abstract

The rise in genomic knowledge over the past decade has revealed the molecular etiology of many diseases, and has identified intricate signaling network activity in human cancers. Genomics provides the opportunity to determine genome structure and capture the activity of thousands of molecular events concurrently, which is important for deciphering highly complex genetic diseases such as cancer. In this review, we focus on genomic efforts directed towards one of cancer's most frequently mutated networks, the RAS pathway. Genomic tools such as gene expression signatures and assessment of mutations across the RAS network enable the capture of RAS signaling complexity. Due to this high level of interaction and cross-talk within the network, efforts to target RAS signaling in the clinic have generally failed, and we currently lack the ability to directly inhibit the RAS protein with high efficacy. We propose that the use of gene expression data can identify effective treatments that broadly inhibit the RAS network as this approach measures pathway activity independent of mutation status or any single mechanism of activation. Here, we review the genomic studies that map the complexity of the RAS network in cancer, and that show how genomic measurements of RAS pathway activation can identify effective RAS inhibition strategies. We also address the challenges and future directions for treating RAS-driven tumors. In summary, genomic assessment of RAS signaling provides a level of complexity necessary to accurately map the network that matches the intricacy of RAS pathway interactions in cancer.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Gene expression signature; Genomics; RAS; Targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27338857      PMCID: PMC5951171          DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  99 in total

Review 1.  Drugging the undruggable RAS: Mission possible?

Authors:  Adrienne D Cox; Stephen W Fesik; Alec C Kimmelman; Ji Luo; Channing J Der
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Scott E Kopetz; Junichi Shindoh; Su S Chen; Andreas Andreou; Steven A Curley; Thomas A Aloia; Dipen M Maru
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Developing gene expression signatures of pathway deregulation in tumors.

Authors:  James W Watters; Christopher J Roberts
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Transforming genes of human bladder and lung carcinoma cell lines are homologous to the ras genes of Harvey and Kirsten sarcoma viruses.

Authors:  C J Der; T G Krontiris; G M Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Regulation of MAPKs by growth factors and receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Menachem Katz; Ido Amit; Yosef Yarden
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-01-10

Review 6.  Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Mark A Lemmon; Joseph Schlessinger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Ras signaling and therapies.

Authors:  Amy Young; Jesse Lyons; Abigail L Miller; Vernon T Phan; Irma Rangel Alarcón; Frank McCormick
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.242

8.  Prognostic implication of EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 gene mutations in a large cohort of Japanese patients with surgically treated lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takayuki Kosaka; Yasushi Yatabe; Ryoichi Onozato; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Tetsuya Mitsudomi
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Kinase requirements in human cells: I. Comparing kinase requirements across various cell types.

Authors:  Dorre A Grueneberg; Sebastien Degot; Joseph Pearlberg; Wenliang Li; Joan E Davies; Amy Baldwin; Wilson Endege; John Doench; Jacqueline Sawyer; Yanhui Hu; Frederick Boyce; Jun Xian; Karl Munger; Ed Harlow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  MEK and PI3K inhibition in solid tumors: rationale and evidence to date.

Authors:  E Jokinen; J P Koivunen
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 8.168

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Intracellular and intercellular signaling networks in cancer initiation, development and precision anti-cancer therapy: RAS acts as contextual signaling hub.

Authors:  Peter Csermely; Tamás Korcsmáros; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 7.727

2.  A CRISPR screen identifies MAPK7 as a target for combination with MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant NSCLC.

Authors:  Nicholas Dompe; Christiaan Klijn; Sara A Watson; Katherine Leng; Jenna Port; Trinna Cuellar; Colin Watanabe; Benjamin Haley; Richard Neve; Marie Evangelista; David Stokoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Arsenite malignantly transforms human prostate epithelial cells in vitro by gene amplification of mutated KRAS.

Authors:  B Alex Merrick; Dhiral P Phadke; Meredith A Bostrom; Ruchir R Shah; Garron M Wright; Xinguo Wang; Oksana Gordon; Katherine E Pelch; Scott S Auerbach; Richard S Paules; Michael J DeVito; Michael P Waalkes; Erik J Tokar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Beyond the Genomic Mutation: Rethinking the Molecular Biomarkers of K-RAS Dependency in Pancreatic Cancers.

Authors:  Carla Mottini; Luca Cardone
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Unexpected Cartilage Phenotype in CD4-Cre-Conditional SOS-Deficient Mice.

Authors:  Geoffrey Guittard; Devorah L Gallardo; Wenmei Li; Nicolas Melis; Julian C Lui; Robert L Kortum; Nicholas G Shakarishvili; Sunmee Huh; Jeffrey Baron; Roberto Weigert; Joshua A Kramer; Lawrence E Samelson; Connie L Sommers
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.