Literature DB >> 24905642

Suitability of Miscanthus species for managing inorganic and organic contaminated land and restoring ecosystem services. A review.

Florien Nsanganwimana1, Bertrand Pourrut1, Michel Mench2, Francis Douay3.   

Abstract

The mitigation of potential health hazards and land scarcity due to land use change can be addressed by restoring functional and ecosystem services of contaminated land. Physico-chemical remediation options are criticized as being costly and not providing environment-friendly solutions. The use of plants and associated microorganisms could be a sustainable, cost-effective option to reduce pollutant exposure. Phytomanagement aims at using valuable non-food crops to alleviate environmental and health risks induced by pollutants, and at restoring ecosystem services. Suitable plant species must be tolerant to contaminants, reduce their transfer into the food chain, and efficiently produce marketable biomass. Based on Miscanthus' capacity to sequestrate inorganic contaminants into the root system and to induce dissipation of persistent organic contaminants in soil, these plant species are favorable for phytostabilization and phytodegradation. Among Miscanthus species, the noninvasive hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus, with a high lignocellulosic content, is a promising biomass crop for the bio-economy, notably the biorefinery and bioenergy industries. Planting this species on contaminated and marginal land is a promising option to avoid changes in arable land use to mitigate the food vs. biofuel controversy. Key issues in promoting sustainable management of Miscanthus sp. on contaminated land are: (a) crop suitability, integration, and sustainability in a region with a potential local market; (b) site suitability in relation to the species' requirements and potential, (c) biotic interactions in the landscape diversity; and (d) increase in shoot yields in line with various stressors (e.g., pollutants, drought, cold temperatures), and with minimal inputs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass; Miscanthus; Phytodegradation; Phytostabilization; Soil contamination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24905642     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  10 in total

1.  Value of biochars from Miscanthus x giganteus cultivated on contaminated soils to decrease the availability of metals in multicontaminated aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Adeline Janus; Aurélie Pelfrêne; Karin Sahmer; Sophie Heymans; Christophe Deboffe; Francis Douay; Christophe Waterlot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Phytoremediation potential of Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina pectinata in soil contaminated with heavy metals.

Authors:  Jolanta Korzeniowska; Ewa Stanislawska-Glubiak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The evaluation of growth and phytoextraction potential of Miscanthus x giganteus and Sida hermaphrodita on soil contaminated simultaneously with Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn.

Authors:  Anna Kocoń; Beata Jurga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comparative assessment of using Miscanthus × giganteus for remediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals: a case of military and mining sites.

Authors:  Asil Nurzhanova; Valentina Pidlisnyuk; Kamila Abit; Chingiz Nurzhanov; Bulat Kenessov; Tatyana Stefanovska; Larry Erickson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The use of reed canary grass and giant miscanthus in the phytoremediation of municipal sewage sludge.

Authors:  Jacek Antonkiewicz; Barbara Kołodziej; Elżbieta Jolanta Bielińska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Response of Three Miscanthus × giganteus Cultivars to Toxic Elements Stress: Part 2, Comparison between Two Growing Seasons.

Authors:  Karim Suhail Al Souki; Clarisse Liné; Jiří Moravec; Francis Douay; Bertrand Pourrut
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30

7.  Nutrient and drought stress: implications for phenology and biomass quality in miscanthus.

Authors:  Ricardo M F da Costa; Rachael Simister; Luned A Roberts; Emma Timms-Taravella; Arthur B Cambler; Fiona M K Corke; Jiwan Han; Richard J Ward; Marcos S Buckeridge; Leonardo D Gomez; Maurice Bosch
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Physiological Response of Miscanthus x giganteus to Plant Growth Regulators in Nutritionally Poor Soil.

Authors:  Hana Malinská; Valentina Pidlisnyuk; Diana Nebeská; Anna Erol; Andrea Medžová; Josef Trögl
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

9.  In Vitro Regeneration of Miscanthus x giganteus through Indirect Organogenesis: Effect of Explant Type and Growth Regulators.

Authors:  Aušra Blinstrubienė; Inga Jančauskienė; Natalija Burbulis
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17

10.  Role of Two Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Remediating Cadmium-Contaminated Soil Combined with Miscanthus floridulus (Lab.).

Authors:  Shuming Liu; Hongmei Liu; Rui Chen; Yong Ma; Bo Yang; Zhiyong Chen; Yunshan Liang; Jun Fang; Yunhua Xiao
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.