| Literature DB >> 34063227 |
Shuming Liu1,2,3, Hongmei Liu1,2,3, Rui Chen1,2,3, Yong Ma1,2,3, Bo Yang1,2,3, Zhiyong Chen1, Yunshan Liang1, Jun Fang1,2,3, Yunhua Xiao1,2,3.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Miscanthus floridulus (Lab.); bioinoculation; metal(loid)s; phytoremediation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063227 PMCID: PMC8147505 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1PGP traits of bacterial isolates. (a) IAA production, (b) ACC deaminase activity, (c) siderophore production. The data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences between groups at the 5% level (ANOVA and Tukey’s test). IAA: indole−3−acetic acid, ACC: 1−aminocyclopropane−1−carboxylic acid.
N2 fixation, P solubilization, and K solubilization of screened PGPB. The data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between groups at the 5% level (ANOVA and Tukey’s test).
| Strain | N2 Fixation | P Solubilization | K Solubilization |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZS1 | 1.96 ± 0.15 bcd | 1.52 ± 0.14 c | 1.97 ± 0.38 a |
| ZS3 | 2.00 ± 0.34 abc | 2.11 ± 0.19 abc | - |
| ZS4 | 1.30 ± 0.05 d | 2.63 ± 0.20 abc | 1.96 ± 0.41 a |
| MR2 | 1.86 ± 0.33 bcd | 1.68 ± 0.02 bc | 2.09 ± 0.27 a |
| MR3 | 2.08 ± 0.07 ab | 3.17 ± 1.15 ab | - |
| MS3 | 1.36 ± 0.12 cd | 3.39 ± 0.67 a | - |
| PR4 | 1.44 ± 0.05 bcd | 3.35 ± 0.49 a | 1.78 ± 0.19 a |
| PS3 | 2.66 ± 0.48 a | 2.24 ± 0.21 abc | - |
| ZR1 | 1.62 ± 0.13 bcd | 2.67 ± 0.67 abc | 1.37 ± 0.17 a |
| TS8 | - | 1.67 ± 0.29 bc | 2.33 ± 0.58 a |
Cadmium maximum tolerance concentration of screened bacteria.
| Strain | MTC (Cd mM) |
|---|---|
| ZS1 | 0.71 |
| ZS3 | 1.07 |
| ZS4 | 1.07 |
| MR2 | 1.07 |
| MR3 | 0.71 |
| MS3 | 1.07 |
| PR4 | 0.71 |
| PS3 | 0.71 |
| ZR1 | 1.78 |
| TS8 | 0.71 |
Figure 2The variations of pH value after metabolizing glucose by screened bacterial isolates. The data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3) and the statistical analysis was calculated by ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Figure 3Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. (a) MR2 and (b) TS8.
Figure 4Optical density of selected bacteria at 0, 0.18, 0.36, and 0.54 mM Cd concentration during different incubation times. (a) MR2 and (b) TS8. The data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences of absorbance between different Cd concentrations between groups at the 5% level (ANOVA and Tukey’s test).
Figure 5Influence of inoculation with TS8 and MR2 on M. floridulus height (a) and dry weight (b). “CK,” without PGPB inoculation; “MR2,” Lelliottia jeotgali MR2 inoculation; “TS8,” Klebsiella michiganensis TS8 inoculation. The data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences between groups at the 5% level (ANOVA and Tukey’s test).
Figure 6Cd concentration in plant tissues/soil and soil pH. (a) Effect of MR2 and TS8 inoculation on Cd uptake by M. floridulus root, stem, and leaf grown for two months in the contaminated soil. (b) Cd concentration in soil after phytoremediation. (c) pH value in soil after phytoremediation. The data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences between groups at the 5% level (ANOVA and Tukey’s test).
Bioconcentration factors and translocation factors of M. floridulus grown in the Cd-contaminated soil inoculated with Lelliottia jeotgali MR2 and Klebsiella michiganensis TS8. Different letters represent significant differences between groups at the 5% level (ANOVA and Tukey’s test).
| Treatments | BCF | TF |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 26.89 ± 6.85 a | 0.82 ± 0.33 b |
| MR2 | 22.14 ± 0.54 a | 1.25 ± 0.03 a |
| TS8 | 23.60 ± 4.23 a | 0.54 ± 0.20 b |