| Literature DB >> 30137291 |
Ricardo M F da Costa1, Rachael Simister2, Luned A Roberts1, Emma Timms-Taravella1, Arthur B Cambler3, Fiona M K Corke4, Jiwan Han4, Richard J Ward5, Marcos S Buckeridge3, Leonardo D Gomez2, Maurice Bosch1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The cultivation of dedicated biomass crops, including miscanthus, on marginal land provides a promising approach to the reduction of dependency on fossil fuels. However, little is known about the impact of environmental stresses often experienced on lower-grade agricultural land on cell-wall quality traits in miscanthus biomass crops. In this study, three different miscanthus genotypes were exposed to drought stress and nutrient stress, both separately and in combination, with the aim of evaluating their impact on plant growth and cell-wall properties.Entities:
Keywords: Bioenergy; biomass quality; cell wall; drought stress; environmental conditions; growth and development; marginal land; miscanthus; nutrient stress; phenotyping; recalcitrance; sugar release
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30137291 PMCID: PMC6821376 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Bot ISSN: 0305-7364 Impact factor: 4.357
Fig. 1.Overview of the different experimental treatments. For each of the three miscanthus genotypes, 30 plants were grown from rhizome material: 15 in Nu+ and 15 in Nu− compost. For six plants per genotype, watering was stopped 26 d after planting until SWC reached 15 %. The remaining six selected plants continued to receive water at 75 % SWC. After 30 d of water treatments, above-ground biomass was harvested for further analyses.
Fig. 2.Representative side-image photographs of the three miscanthus genotypes grown in either Nu+ or Nu− compost and exposed to either well-watered (75 % SWC) or drought (15 % SWC) conditions. Photographs are from 2, 15 and 30 d after initiation of the drought treatment. The same biological replicate is shown for each genotype per treatment.
Fig. 3.
Height, shoot areas and percentage yellow pixels for each of the three miscanthus genotypes for each treatment (Nu+/75 % SWC; Nu−/75 % SWC; Nu+/15 % SWC; Nu−/15 % SWC) as extracted from RGB side images of the plants from 10 d before the start of drought treatment to 30 d after the start of the treatment. For each plant, images used for feature extraction were taken from two side-view angles with an interval of 90°. Data represent averages from six biological replicates for each genotype and treatment. Error bars indicate standard error.
Fig. 4.
Saccharification of cell-wall material from harvested miscanthus leaf and stem samples after the experimental treatments. The cell-wall biomass was subjected to a mild pretreatment (water at 94 °C for 30 min) before enzymatic saccharification. Sugar release was measured by colorimetric detection of reducing sugar equivalents. Data represent averages from four biological replicates for each genotype and treatment, with four technical replicates for each sample. Outliers were excluded by the z-score calculation method (excluded z-score >4). Error bars indicate standard deviation. The saccharification data are tabulated in Supplementary Data Table S4.
Matrix monosaccharide content (expressed as percentage of total DW biomass)
| Leaf | Stem | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar, genotype | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich |
| Fucose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.02 ± ≤0.01 | 0.02 ± ≤0.01 |
| Sac-5 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.01 ± ≤0.01 | 0.01 ± ≤0.01 |
| Gig-311 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± ≤0.01 |
| Arabinose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 4.27 ± 0.23 | 4.12 ± 0.36 | 3.04 ± 0.52 | 2.83 ± 0.33 |
| Sac-5 | 3.73 ± 0.25 | 3.47 ± 0.30 | 1.53 ± 0.18 | 1.77 ± 0.13 |
| Gig-311 | 3.76 ± 0.23 | 3.92 ± 0.09 | 2.09 ± 0.92 | 1.62 ± 0.14 |
| Galactose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 1.11 ± 0.06 | 1.04 ± 0.07 | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 0.44 ± 0.06 |
| Sac-5 | 0.84 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.05 |
| Gig-311 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 0.42 ± 0.27 | 0.30 ± 0.05 |
| Rhamnose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Sac-5 | 0.03 ± ≤0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | ≤0.01 ± ≤0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
| Gig-311 | 0.03 ± ≤0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
| Glucose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 7.84 ± 3.62 | 5.56 ± 3.74 | 12.95 ± 6.67 | 4.54 ± 2.29 |
| Sac-5 | 5.67 ± 2.74 | 1.86 ± 1.20 | 11.87 ± 2.39 | 2.62 ± 0.92 |
| Gig-311 | 3.12 ± 1.39 | 3.12 ± 1.29 | 7.81 ± 4.17 | 7.20 ± 4.14 |
| Xylose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 15.76 ± 1.94 | 15.52 ± 1.32 | 17.37 ± 1.11 | 18.10 ± 1.47 |
| Sac-5 | 16.08 ± 0.68 | 15.76 ± 1.33 | 13.27 ± 1.03 | 15.30 ± 0.58 |
| Gig-311 | 15.41 ± 0.74 | 16.08 ± 0.27 | 13.20 ± 1.66 | 12.92 ± 0.83 |
| Mannose | ||||
| Sin-11 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± ≤0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| Sac-5 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± ≤0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Gig-311 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± ≤0.01 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation of biological and technical replicates (minimum for each value, n = 4; total samples for each monosaccharide, n = 60).
Leaf and stem samples used for this assay were collected at the end of the experiment from the three miscanthus genotypes grown at 75 % SWC.
Supplementary Data Table S6 shows the ANOVA results for the matrix monosaccharides.
Crystalline cellulose content measured as percentage of cell-wall biomass DW
| Leaf | Stem | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich |
| Sin-11 | 28.74 ± 4.66 | 25.63 ± 1.27 | 33.66 ± 5.41 | 29.86 ± 1.85 |
| Sac-5 | 31.04 ± 3.59 | 28.31 ± 5.78 | 27.44 ± 2.06 | 34.23 ± 5.37 |
| Gig-311 | 32.32 ± 5.34 | 34.87 ± 2.89 | 33.65 ± 6.35 | 33.68 ± 6.19 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation of biological and technical replicates (minimum for each value, n = 8; total samples, n = 96).
Leaf and stem samples used for this assay were collected at the end of the experiment from the three miscanthus genotypes grown at 75 % SWC.
Outliers were excluded via the z-score calculation method (excluded z-score >4).
Supplementary Data Table S8 shows the ANOVA results for the cellulose content.
Acetyl bromide-soluble lignin content (ABSL) as percentage of cell-wall biomass DW
| Leaf | Stem | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich |
| Sin-11 | 15.08 ± 1.49 | 14.60 ± 0.87 | 15.76 ± 1.80 | 16.65 ± 1.47 |
| Gig-311 | 16.24 ± 0.87 | 15.78 ± 4.35 | 17.00 ± 1.40 | 16.78 ± 1.54 |
| Sac-5 | 15.40 ± 0.77 | 16.14 ± 1.17 | 18.13 ± 1.45 | 16.16 ± 0.87 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation of biological and technical replicates (for each value, n = 3; total samples, n = 144).
Leaf and stem samples used for this assay were collected at the end of the experiment from the three miscanthus genotypes grown at 75 % SWC.
Biomass measurements expressed as relative percentages
| Shoot area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | Nu+/75 % SWC | Nu−/75 % SWC | Nu+/15 % SWC | Nu−/15 % SWC |
| Sin-11 | 100 (95) | 83 (79) | 17 (16) | 56 (53) |
| Sac-5 | 100 (99) | 48 (47) | 14 (14) | 52 (52) |
| Gig-311 | 100 (100) | 49 (49) | 24 (24) | 32 (32) |
| Fresh weight | ||||
| Nu+/75 % SWC | Nu−/75 % SWC | Nu+/15 % SWC | Nu−/15 % SWC | |
| Sin-11 | 100 (109) | 73 (79) | 11 (12) | 30 (33) |
| Sac-5 | 100 (101) | 66 (67) | 23 (23) | 51 (51) |
| Gig-311 | 100 (100) | 63 (63) | 23 (23) | 40 (40) |
| Dry weight | ||||
| Nu+/75 % SWC | Nu−/75 % SWC | Nu+/15 % SWC | Nu−/15 % SWC | |
| Sin-11 | 100 (91) | 95 (86) | 27 (24) | 52 (48) |
| Sac-5 | 100 (97) | 88 (86) | 29 (28) | 59 (57) |
| Gig-311 | 100 (100) | 84 (84) | 25 (25) | 47 (47) |
Values for Sin-11, Sac-5, and Gig-311 at Nu+/75 % SWC were set at 100 %.
Biomass measures for the various treatments for a given genotype are relative to those at Nu+/75 % SWC.
Relative percentages for the biomass measurements in this table are derived from absolute measurements (see Supplementary data Fig. S3) taken from the miscanthus genotypes at the end of the experimental treatments.
Percentage values in brackets are all relative to those of Gig-311 at Nu+/75 % SWC.
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass from three miscanthus genotypes. Plants were grown in Nu+ and Nu− conditions and at 15 % or 75 % SWC. Saccharification was measured by colorimetric detection of reducing sugar equivalents, and is expressed as nmol of reducing sugars released per mg of dry biomass per hour after 8 h of saccharification. Pie charts indicate the relative (% DW) lignocellulosic biomass composition for leaf and stem of the three miscanthus genotypes grown at 75 % SWC under Nu+ or Nu− conditions. Minor sugars include fucose, galactose and rhamnose. See Tables 1–3 for further details.