Literature DB >> 24904655

Arg389Gly β1-adrenergic receptor polymorphism and susceptibility to syncope during tilt test.

Monika Zelazowska1, Małgorzata Lelonek2, Wojciech Fendler3, Tadeusz Pietrucha1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Numerous hormones, neurotransmitters, and other stimuli exert their biological effect on cellular functioning through heptahelical receptors coupled to G proteins (GPCR - G protein-coupled receptors). Adrenergic receptors that belong to this superfamily of receptors are components of the sympathetic nervous system. They play a pivotal role in blood pressure regulation and myocardial contractility. Alterations of the adrenergic receptor pathway have been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of vasovagal syncope (VVS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the distribution of Arg389Gly polymorphism within the ADRB1 gene among patients with recurrent syncope.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Arg389Gly single nucleotide polymorphism was analyzed in 205 patients with recurrent syncope. Ninety-five patients (46%) had a positive head-up tilt test (HUT) result. The control group comprised 143 non-fainting subjects. Genotyping was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) with BstNI enzyme.
RESULTS: Both analyzed groups had similar distribution of the 389Gly allele. Sixty percent of polymorphic 389Gly carriers belong to the group of syncopal patients, while 40% belong to the control group of healthy subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: An association between syncopal incidence and Arg389Gly polymorphism within the ADRB1 gene was not found. The analyzed polymorphism affecting sympathetic activity does not influence vasovagal syncope in Polish patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tilt test; adrenergic receptors; genetic polymorphism; syncope

Year:  2014        PMID: 24904655      PMCID: PMC4042044          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2014.42576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Syncope is considered as a common and potentially dangerous clinical problem [1]. Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is one the most frequently observed types of this ailment [2, 3]. The principal pathophysiological mechanism that underlies VVS is an abnormal, excessive reaction of cardiac mechanoreceptors that leads to hypotonia and/or bradycardia. Overstimulation of the autonomic nervous system that precedes syncope may be a result of alterations of cardiac adrenergic receptors’ (AR) structure and/or function. The Arg389Gly polymorphism of the β1-AR gene (ADRB1) is a functionally important alteration, associated with lower stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity [4]. Moreover, this polymorphism was previously linked to a positive result of the head-up tilt test (HUT) [5] in the Mexican population. The results however are not unanimous, as Sorrentino et al. [6] have shown that the Arg389Gly genetic variant should not be considered as a risk factor for vasovagal syncope in the Italian population. The objective of this report was to determine the distribution of Arg389Gly polymorphism in the β1-AR gene among Polish patients with recurrent syncope who were examined by HUT.

Material and methods

Study population

The study population consisted of 205 adult patients suffering from syncope and free of any other diseases diagnosed in the Department of Cardiology at the Medical University of Lodz. Exclusion criteria were as follows: ECG abnormalities, positive family history of sudden cardiac death, syncope due to cardiac disease. Patients were tilted according to the Italian protocol [7, 8]. The second group of analyzed subjects was composed of 143 healthy volunteers without any prior incidents of syncope. The clinical and demographic characteristics of study and control groups are presented in Table I. The study was approved by the Local Bioethics Committee and the patients’ informed consent was obtained in all cases prior to any interventions related to the study protocol.
Table I

General characteristics of study and control group

ParameterControlFainting
Negative HUTPositive HUT
Number of patients14311095
Mean age [years]264142
Males, n (%)77 (54)37 (34)37 (39)
BMI, mean ± SD [kg/m2]22.32 ±2.1725.00 ±4.2825.10 ±4.37
Systolic blood pressure at rest, mean ± SD [mm Hg]132.8 ±18.2126.8 ±14.7
Diastolic blood pressure at rest, mean ± SD [mm Hg]83.5 ±12.181.0 ±10.4
Heart rate at rest, mean ± SD [bpm]68.5 ±12.268.0 ±13.7
Saturation at rest, mean ± SD (%)97.4 ±1.297.7 ±1.3
General characteristics of study and control group

Tilt test protocol

The HUT according to the Italian protocol was performed using the tilt table SP-1 with a foot support and straps as described previously [7, 8]. Continuous ECG-curve registration was performed using a cardiomonitor and a 3-lead digital ECG recorder. Blood pressure, respiration rate and blood saturation were measured using a pulse oximeter throughout the HUT according to the protocol. The HUT consisted of a 20-min supine pre-tilt phase and a passive phase with the patient tilted upright to 60°. This passive phase of the Italian protocol was maintained for 20 min. If syncope did not occur during the passive phase, 400 µg of sublingual nitroglycerine in spray was administered in the upright position. The drug challenge phase was maintained for 20 min. Syncope of patients with positive HUT was classified on the basis of the modified Vasovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) classification as: VASIS 1 (mixed), VASIS 2 A (cardioinhibition without asystole), VASIS 2 B (cardioinhibition with asystole), VASIS 3 (vasodepressive). Similarly to earlier studies by the authors [9], due to the small number of patients in VASIS 2 A and B subgroups, both types were analyzed jointly. For statistical calculations, VASIS 1 and VASIS 3 were grouped together to be compared with VASIS 2.

Analysis of Arg389Gly polymorphism

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood drawn from the patients to EDTA-coated vials using the Chemagic DNA Blood100 kit (Chemagen, Baesweiler, Germany). The Arg389Gly polymorphism genotype (rs1801253) was detected using the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method. The DNA fragment was amplified using site-specific oligonucleotide primers spanning the rs1801253 polymorphic site: P1: 5’-TGGGCTACGCCAACTCGG-3’ and P2: 5’-GGCCCCGACGACATCGTC-3’. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in the final volume of 25 µl containing 1 µM of MgCl2, 0.2 mM of equimolar deoxynucleotide mix, 0.8 µM of each primer and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide. An initial denaturation step (94°C for 5 min) was followed by thirty cycles of: denaturation (94°C for 1 min), annealing (59°C for 1 min) and an extension phase (72°C for 1 min). Final extension was performed at 72°C for 8 min. Digestion of the 221-bp PCR product with restriction enzyme BstNI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, UK) yielded a 221-bp product for Arg/Arg genotype, three (221-, 154- and 67-bp) products for heterozygous Arg/Gly genotype and two (154- and 67-bp) products for Gly/Gly homozygotes. Digested fragments were scrutinized on 40% polyacrylamide gel and visualized under UV light after ethidium bromide staining (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Genotyping results for Arg389Gly polymorphism of β1-adrenergic receptor gene. Shown is pattern of bands on ethidium bromide-stained gel electrophoresis after BstNI digestion of PCR product. Lane 1, homozygous Arg/Arg; Lane 2, heterozygous Arg/Gly; Lane 3, homozygous Gly/Gly; Lane 4, GeneRuler™ 100 bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas). The position and size of bands are indicated by arrows

Genotyping results for Arg389Gly polymorphism of β1-adrenergic receptor gene. Shown is pattern of bands on ethidium bromide-stained gel electrophoresis after BstNI digestion of PCR product. Lane 1, homozygous Arg/Arg; Lane 2, heterozygous Arg/Gly; Lane 3, homozygous Gly/Gly; Lane 4, GeneRuler™ 100 bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas). The position and size of bands are indicated by arrows

Statistical analysis

As a measure of association odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used. The χ2 tests were performed to test for deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the number of observations and variables. Statistica version 8.0 PL (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA) was used for data analysis. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Mean age of fainting patients in the study group was 41.5 ±15.7 year; 36% were males. Ninety-five patients (46%) had positive HUT: 21 during the passive phase and 65 during nitroglycerine administration. VASIS 1 response was observed in 63 patients, VASIS 2 response in 10 and VASIS 3 response in 19. Negative result of HUT was observed in a group of 110 patients (54%). The control group comprised 143 patients (54% males) (Table I); mean age equalled 28.7 ±12.00 years (22.0–30.0). The control group was significantly younger than the study group (p < 0.0001). Sex distribution differed significantly due to a greater percentage of males in the control group (p = 0.003). The frequencies of Arg389Gly genotypes in the control group did not show significant deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.13). The distribution of all genotypes is presented in Table II. No significant differences were observed between the study and control group (p = 0.52). Allele distributions in the control group and syncopal patients were very similar (p = 0.81). Carriers of the polymorphic 389Gly allele were present in both groups and were distributed similarly in both groups. Therefore the carriage of the polymorphic allele did not increase the odds of syncope (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69–1.63) (Table III). An association between carriage of this allele and negative result of the tilt test in the group of patients with syncope was observed, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09; Table III). There was no association between the VASIS classification type of positive tilt response and genotype (p = 0.76) or polymorphic 389Gly allele carriage (p = 1.00).
Table II

Genotype distribution of Arg389Gly polymorphism in patients with syncope and control group

GroupGenotype
AAAGGG
Fainting110 (59%)82 (59%)13 (72%)
Negative HUT53 (28%)49 (35%)8 (44%)
Positive HUT57 (31%)33 (24%)5 (28%)
Control77 (41%)58 (41%)5 (28%)

p = 0.52 for all fainting patients and control group; p = 0.37 for negative HUT, positive HUT and control group

Table III

Distribution of alleles in patients with syncope and control group

GroupGenotype
Arg/ArgGly+
Fainting110 (59%)95 (60%)
Negative HUT53 (28%)57 (36%)
Positive HUT57 (30%)38 (24%)
Control77 (41%)63 (40%)

p = 0.23 for negative HUT, positive HUT and control group;

p = 0.81 for all fainting patients and control group

Genotype distribution of Arg389Gly polymorphism in patients with syncope and control group p = 0.52 for all fainting patients and control group; p = 0.37 for negative HUT, positive HUT and control group Distribution of alleles in patients with syncope and control group p = 0.23 for negative HUT, positive HUT and control group; p = 0.81 for all fainting patients and control group

Discussion

Numerous recent studies support the hypothesis that vasovagal syncope may be in fact a disease of strong genetic background [10]. Still, the association of various genetic variations with VVS is not as evident as initially expected, due to the limited number of relevant research papers focused on the matter [11] and further overshadowed by small sample sizes. In a study of French patients with unexplained syncope, a strong association between syncopal incidence, positive HUT and CC variant in the adenosine A2A receptor (ADORA) gene was found [12]. Recently, Sorrentino and Forleo et al. investigated the 3A/4A polymorphism of the endothelin-1 gene (EDN1). A strong association between 4A variant carriage and susceptibility to syncope was elucidated [13]. In a group of Polish patients with syncopal events, polymorphic variants of GNAS1, GNB3 and RGS2 were examined and showed mixed effects [7, 9, 14–17]. Although the molecular mechanism of VVS is still under investigation, preliminary results of aforementioned studies are promising. Genetic alterations in the sympathetic system may be involved in pathophysiological mechanisms leading to VVS. Signal transduction pathway β1-adrenergic receptors regulate critical aspects of heart muscle contractility and blood pressure control [18]. They mediate the actions of two neurotransmitters (noradrenaline and adrenaline) through activation of heterotrimeric G proteins, and belong to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. In vertebrates, this family of proteins contains from 1000 to 3000 members coded by genes that comprise 1–3% of the whole genome [19]. The GPCRs are built of seven transmembrane α-helices that are buried in cellular membrane preceded by an extracellular N-terminal domain and followed by an intracellular C-terminal domain [20]. The studied Arg to Gly polymorphism at position 389 of β1-AR is located close to the carboxyl terminus that is predicted to be an α-helix located on the cytoplasmic site of the cellular membrane. This region is evolutionally conserved as it is ubiquitous for Gs protein interaction [4, 21, 22]. Arg389Gly variants respond differently to catecholamine treatment [23]. The Arg variant exhibits increased responsiveness to agonist-induced stimulation in vitro [24] while the Gly variant is believed to disrupt α-helical structure of the region and lead to reduced responsiveness [25]. Moreover, Arg389Gly polymorphism may influence the GRK-dependent desensitization process [26]. The study of Rathz et al. revealed that desensitization for the Arg389 variant was in fact 50% greater than that of the 389Gly genotype [27]. The distribution of Arg389Gly polymorphism was reported in dbSNP. According to data gathered in this database, the frequencies of Arg389 and 389Gly alleles in the Caucasian population are equal to 0.68 and 0.32, respectively. The OMIM database gives the frequencies of 0.74 and 0.26 for Arg389 and 389Gly alleles, respectively. In our study, the proportion of genetic variants is similar and in line with data of healthy subjects (Table IV).
Table IV

Allele frequencies of Arg389Gly polymorphism in ADRB1 gene in different populations

PopulationNumber of subjectsAllele frequencyReference
ArgGly
Non-fainting subjects1430.7600.240Present study
Syncopal patients with negative HUT1100.7000.300
Syncopal patients with positive HUT950.7700.230
HapMap CEU ss38568848600.6830.317 [32]
OMIM500.7400.260 [32, 33]
US White3160.7200.280 [34]
Syncopal patients with negative HUT170.9700.030 [6]
Syncopal patients with positive HUT330.6970.303
All syncopal patients1290.6900.310 [7]
Syncopal patients with negative HUT560.6600.340
Syncopal patients with positive HUT730.7100.290
Allele frequencies of Arg389Gly polymorphism in ADRB1 gene in different populations So far, the main limitation of conducted studies is the lack of a control group composed of a normative population representative of non-fainting subjects. In the present report, a group of 143 healthy volunteers was enrolled and genotyped. The distribution of Arg389Gly variants of the ADRB1 gene in controls was close to HapMap data (0.76 for Arg389 variant and 0.24 for 389Gly variant; for further data see Table IV). A limiting factor here may be the significant age difference, as controls were younger than fainting patients. Taking into consideration the fact that the effect of a genetic polymorphism does not generally increase during an individual's lifetime and vasovagal syncope manifests mainly at early age [1], selection of the control group seems to be proper despite the age difference. Marquez et al. [4] showed that in patients of Mexican origin the Arg389Gly polymorphism may be associated with susceptibility to fainting. The 389Gly variant was found to be more frequent in patients with syncope and positive HUT (30.3%) in comparison with fainters with negative HUT (3%). Marquez stated that a decreased inotropic response of the Gly allele may alter adrenergic stimulation that takes place during orthostatic challenge. However, the distribution of the 389Gly allele in the positive HUT group is similar to that in the general healthy population of Caucasian descent (Table IV). The 389Gly variant is likely to be important as a key determinant of susceptibility to fainting during HUT, but cannot be considered as a main risk factor of vasovagal syncope. Sorrentino et al. [6] in a cohort of Italian patients did not find evidence for a genetic background of vasovagal syncope. In this study, a broad range of genetic polymorphisms affecting sympathetic activity were scrutinized, i.e. Arg492Cys (ADRA1A gene), Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly (ADRB1), Arg16Gly and Gln27Glu (ADRB2), 825C/T (GNB3), –1021C/T (DBH) and S/L (SLC6A4). None of them seemed to influence the result of positive HUT. Previous studies demonstrated that vasovagal syncope is more frequent in females than in males (42% vs. 31%) [28, 29]. However, in the aforementioned study the individuals were diagnosed exclusively based on their questionnaire without performing HUT or other medical investigations. Thus, females are more susceptible to fainting and/or are more likely to volunteer the information than males. In the group of fainting patients the result of HUT does not depend on gender as shown by Pietrucha et al. [30] but females experience syncopal incidents for longer periods of their lives [31]. In the present report, the male population was overrepresented in the control group (54% in control vs. 36% in study group). This parameter may slightly influence the results of the research, but there is no strong scientific evidence that susceptibility to vasovagal syncope depends on gender. The main limitation of the present study was the small number of healthy subjects enrolled in the control group. Due to the low abundance of homozygotes for the Gly allele and small sample size, the results should be confirmed in a larger population. In conclusion, an association between syncopal incidence and Arg389Gly polymorphism within the ADRB1 gene was not found. The analyzed polymorphism affecting sympathetic activity does not influence tilt-induced vasovagal syncope in Polish patients.
  33 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Arg389Gly beta 1-adrenoceptor polymorphism varies in frequency among different ethnic groups but does not alter response in vivo.

Authors:  H G Xie; V Dishy; G Sofowora; R B Kim; R Landau; R M Smiley; H H Zhou; A J Wood; P Harris; C M Stein
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  2001-04

3.  Prevalence and triggers of syncope in medical students.

Authors:  Karin S Ganzeboom; Nancy Colman; Johannes B Reitsma; Win K Shen; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success.

Authors:  J Bockaert; J P Pin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  A gain-of-function polymorphism in a G-protein coupling domain of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  D A Mason; J D Moore; S A Green; S B Liggett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Shortened head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  A Del Rosso; P Bartoli; A Bartoletti; A Brandinelli-Geri; F Bonechi; M Maioli; F Mazza; A Michelucci; L Russo; E Salvetti; M Sansoni; A Zipoli; A Fierro; A Ieri
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Mutation T/C,Ile 131 of the gene encoding the alfa subunit of the human Gs protein and predisposition to vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Malgorzata Lelonek; Tadeusz Pietrucha; Monika Matyjaszczyk; Jan Henryk Goch
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 8.  Vasovagal syncope: state or trait?

Authors:  Anna Serletis Bizios; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Endothelin system polymorphisms in tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Sandro Sorrentino; Cinzia Forleo; Massimo Iacoviello; Pietro Guida; Valentina D'Andria; Stefano Favale
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Underlying diseases in syncope of children in China.

Authors:  Li Chen; Cheng Wang; Hongwei Wang; Hong Tian; Chaoshu Tang; Hongfang Jin; Junbao Du
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Association of ADRB1 gene polymorphisms with pain sensitivity in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Shuang Feng; Nan Li; Sheng Xu; Hao Wang; Wei Yu; Yan Lu; Jianping Cao; Yan Meng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Early hemodynamic response to the tilt test in patients with syncope.

Authors:  Edward Koźluk; Gerard Cybulski; Agnieszka Piątkowska; Inga Zastawna; Wiktor Niewiadomski; Anna Strasz; Anna Gąsiorowska; Maciej Kempa; Dariusz Kozłowski; Grzegorz Opolski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 3.  The Search for the Genes of Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Robert S Sheldon; Roopinder K Sandhu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-28

4.  Vasovagal Syncope Is Associated with Variants in Genes Involved in Neurohumoral Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Boris Titov; Natalya Matveeva; Olga Kulakova; Natalia Baulina; Elizaveta Bazyleva; Grigory Kheymets; Anatolii Rogoza; Alexander Pevzner; Olga Favorova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Genetic Analysis of Cardiac Syncope-Related Genes in Korean Patients with Recurrent Neurally Mediated Syncope.

Authors:  Sung Ho Lee; Jong Eun Park; Chang-Seok Ki; Seung-Jung Park; Young Keun On; Kyoung-Min Park; June Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.