Literature DB >> 24903491

Differences in observers' and teachers' fidelity assessments.

William B Hansen1, Melinda M Pankratz, Dana C Bishop.   

Abstract

As evidence-based programs become disseminated, understanding the degree to which they are implemented with fidelity is crucial. This study tested the validity of fidelity ratings made by observers versus those made by teachers. We hypothesized that teachers' reports about fidelity would have a positivity bias when compared to observers' reports. Further, we hypothesized that there would generally be low correspondence between teachers' and observers' ratings of fidelity. We examined teachers' and observers' ratings as they were related to mediating variables targeted for change by the intervention. Finally, we examined the role that years of teaching experience played in achieving fidelity. Eighteen teachers and four research assistants participated in this project as raters. Teachers made video recordings of their implementation of All Stars and completed fidelity assessment forms. Trained observers independently completed parallel forms for 215 sampled classroom sessions. Both teachers and observers rated adherence, quality of delivery, attendance, and participant engagement. Teachers made more positive fidelity ratings than did observers. With the exception of ratings for attendance, teachers and observers failed to agree on fidelity ratings. Observers' ratings were significantly related to students' pretest assessments of targeted program mediators. That observers' ratings were related to students' pretest scores, suggests it is easier to teach well when students are predisposed to program success. Teachers' ratings were infrequently related to mediators, but when they were, the relationship was counterintuitive. Experienced teachers taught with greater fidelity than novice teachers. While possibly inflated and inaccurate, gathering fidelity assessments from teachers may sensitize them to issues of fidelity as a result of requiring form completion. Assessing fidelity through observers' ratings of video recordings has significant merit. As a longterm investment in improving prevention outcomes, policy makers should consider requiring both teacher and observer fidelity assessments as essential components of evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24903491     DOI: 10.1007/s10935-014-0351-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Prev        ISSN: 0278-095X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines.

Authors:  A S Adams; S B Soumerai; J Lomas; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Drug education practice: results of an observational study.

Authors:  W B Hansen; R B McNeal
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1999-02

Review 3.  A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.

Authors:  Linda Dusenbury; Rosalind Brannigan; Mathea Falco; William B Hansen
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2003-04

4.  Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation.

Authors:  Cady Berkel; Anne M Mauricio; Erin Schoenfelder; Irwin N Sandler
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-03

5.  Measuring quality of delivery in a substance use prevention program.

Authors:  Steven Giles; Julia Jackson-Newsom; Melinda M Pankratz; William B Hansen; Christopher L Ringwalt; Linda Dusenbury
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-11-22

6.  Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school.

Authors:  R D Abbott; J O'Donnell; J D Hawkins; K G Hill; R Kosterman; R F Catalano
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1998-10

Review 7.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control?

Authors:  A V Dane; B H Schneider
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01

8.  Pilot test results comparing the All Stars program with seventh grade D.A.R.E.: program integrity and mediating variable analysis.

Authors:  W B Hansen
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.164

9.  Measuring Fidelity and Adaptation: Reliability of a Instrument for School-Based Prevention Programs.

Authors:  Dana C Bishop; Melinda M Pankratz; William B Hansen; Jordan Albritton; Lauren Albritton; Joann Strack
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Studying implementation quality of a school-based prevention curriculum in frontier Alaska: application of video-recorded observations and expert panel judgment.

Authors:  Knowlton W Johnson; Kristen A Ogilvie; David A Collins; Stephen R Shamblen; Lisa G Dirks; Christopher L Ringwalt; Jennifer J Norland
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2010-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of sampling approaches for monitoring schoolwide inclusion program fidelity.

Authors:  Hank S Bohanon; Meng-Jia Wu
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-01-20

2.  Three Cs of Translating Evidence-Based Programs for Youth and Families to Practice Settings.

Authors:  Kimberley E Freire; Leah Perkinson; Susan Morrel-Samuels; Marc A Zimmerman
Journal:  New Dir Child Adolesc Dev       Date:  2015

3.  Quality Matters: Implementation Moderates Student Outcomes in the PATHS Curriculum.

Authors:  Neil Humphrey; Alexandra Barlow; Ann Lendrum
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-02

4.  Self-Reported Engagement in a Drug Prevention Program: Individual and Classroom Effects on Proximal and Behavioral Outcomes.

Authors:  William B Hansen; Charles B Fleming; Lawrence M Scheier
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2019-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.