Literature DB >> 24903479

Effects of the small-molecule inhibitor of integrin α4, TBC3486, on pre-B-ALL cells.

Y T Hsieh1, E J Gang1, S N Shishido1, H N Kim1, J Pham1, S Khazal1, A Osborne1, Z A Esguerra1, E Kwok1, J Jang1, H Bonig2, R J Biediger3, P Vanderslice3, Y M Kim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24903479      PMCID: PMC4190402          DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.
The treatment of patients with chemotherapy-resistant leukemia remains a challenge. A role of the microenvironment for drug resistance of leukemia cells has been proposed.[1] We have identified the adhesion molecule integrin α4 as a central mediator of drug resistance of pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).[2] We thus demonstrated that chemotherapy-resistant pre-B-ALL cells can be eradicated in a xenograft model by concurrent blockade of α4 using natalizumab, a humanized anti-α4 antibody in clinical use against multiple sclerosis,[3] and Crohn's Disease.[2] Here, we extended our studies to an alternative α4 inhibitor, the non-peptidic small molecule TBC3486. Previous in vitro assays and molecular modeling studies indicated that TBC3486 behaves as a ligand mimetic, competing with VCAM-1 for the MIDAS site of integrin α4.[4] As such, the compound has shown efficacy in integrin α4-dependent models of inflammatory and autoimmune disease[4] and has shown efficacy in mice with autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a model for multiple sclerosis.[5] As opposed to natalizumab, which will inhibit both members of the α4 integrin family, α4β1 and α4β7, TBC3486 is 200-fold more potent in inhibiting α4β1 than α4β7. In addition, it is completely inactive against all other integrins tested, including members of the β2, β3 as well as other members of the β1 family of integrins.[4] The potential usefulness of this novel inhibitor for pre-B-ALL treatment was tested in our established in vitro and in vivo assays.[2, 4] We evaluated the effect of TBC3486 on de-adhesion of patient-derived ALL cells (LAX7R) using established adhesion assays. As a control for our studies, a close structural analog was used that lacks activity toward α4β1 integrin (THI0012). After activating LAX7R cells with 1 mM Mn2+, leukemia cells were co-cultured with the murine stromal cell line OP9.[6, 7] Subsequently, LAX7R cells were treated with different doses of TBC3486 (5, 10 and 25 μM) and its control, THI0012 (5, 10 and 25 μM), for 4 days. TBC3486 dose-dependently inhibited adhesion of ALL cells (Figure 1a), albeit the adhesion was not completely blocked. The dose of 25 μM was selected for subsequent studies. The concentrations of compound required for inhibition in these assays are higher than previously reported.[4] This is due to the fact that TB3486 is highly protein bound in the presence of 20% serum (used in these assays), which significantly reduces the amount of free compound available to bind to the integrin receptor. Next, we determined whether TBC3486 decreases binding of three xenograft cells derived from primary pre-B-ALL cases (LAX7R, ICN3 and SFO3) to the counter-receptor of α4 integrin, human VCAM-1. Adhesion assays were performed as previously described[4, 8, 9] by culturing ALL samples treated with TBC3486 (25 μM) or THI0012 (25 μM) on hVCAM-1-coated plates for 2 days. Compared with the control group, TBC3486-treated ALL cells showed significantly less adhesion to hVCAM-1 (Figures 1c, e and g); however, the adhesion was not completely blocked. CD49d (MFI) is expressed with higher intensity in LAX7R compared with the other two samples (ICN3 and SFO3) (data not shown), which may explain why TBC3486 blocked a larger percentage of LAX7R adhesion to VCAM-1. In addition to blocking cell adhesion, TBC3486 treatment also specifically targeted the expression of integrin α4, but not integrin α5 and α6 (Figure 1b). The treatment with TBC3486 did not affect cell viability in all three cases (Figures 1d, f and h) compared with the THI0012 control. Taken together, TBC3486 leads to the partial de-adhesion of pre-B-ALL cells from its counter-receptor VCAM-1 under the conditions described.
Figure 1

Effects of TBC3486 treatment on adhesion and integrin expression of ALL cells. (a) Percentage of adhesion of LAX7R cells treated with different doses of TBC3486 and THI0012 on OP9 for 4 days. *P<0.05, mean±s.d., performed in triplicates. (b) Expression of α4, α5 and α6 integrins presented as histograms after 4 days of TBC3486 (25 μM) and THI0012 (25 μM) treatment. Three ALL cells (c,d: LAX7R; e,f: ICN3; g,h: SF03) were treated with THI0012 control (white bar) or TBC3486 (red bar) on plates coated with human VCAM-1 or 2% bovine serum albumin as control for 2 days. (c, e, g) Adhesion of ALL cells ( × 400 magnification) and % of adhering cells is shown. (d, f, h) Viability of leukemia cells treated with TBC3486 or THI0012 control was determined by trypan blue exclusion.

We previously showed that antibody-mediated integrin α4 blockade can sensitize leukemia cells to chemotherapy.[2] Therefore, we evaluated whether TBC3486 can not only de-adhere cells from its counter-receptors but also sensitize them to chemotherapy. To study the drug sensitivity of human leukemia, ALL (LAX7R) cells were co-cultured with murine calvaria-derived OP9 stromal cells, which allow in vitro studies beyond 2 days. Then this co-culture was exposed to chemotherapy as previously described.[9, 10] ALL cells were treated with chemotherapy (vincristine, dexamethasone, L-asparaginase; VDL) or saline as control for 4 days, with TBC3486 (25 μM) or control THI0012. TBC3486 with VDL treatment reduced the cell viability of human leukemia LAX7R (51±1% vs 31±1% P<0.05) (Figure 2a), ICN3 (60±3% vs 49±1% P<0.05) (Figure 2b) and SFO3 (78±1% vs 65±1% P<0.05) (Figure 2c), indicating that this combination therapy sensitized leukemia cells to chemotherapy in vitro. Nevertheless, all chemoprotection afforded by OP9 cells was removed by TBC3486 in spite of only partial de-adhesion. This observation at least suggests that effects over and above adhesion and physical chemoprotection provided by stromal cells are mediated through α4 integrin.
Figure 2

TBC3486 treatment sensitizes ALL cells to chemotherapy. (a–c) ALL cells (a) LAX7R; (b) ICN3; (c) SF03) were co-cultured with (right panel) or without OP9 cells (left panel) for 4 days and treated with TBC3486 (25 μM) or THI0012 (25 μM) in combination chemotherapy (VDL: V=0.0005 μM, D=0.005 nM, L=0.0005 IU/ml) in vitro and viability of leukemia cells was determined by trypan blue exclusion *P<0.05; experiments were performed in triplicates. (d) ALL cells (LAX7R) were injected into NSG mice (5 × 104 cells/mouse) and recipient mice were then treated with 10 mg/kg/day TBC3486 or THI0012 control, starting on day 3 post leukemia injection. The daily administrations were split into two intraperitoneal injections per day for 2 weeks. In addition, mice were treated with vincristine (0.5 mg/kg once a week), dexamethasone (8 mg/kg five times a week) and L-asparaginase (800 IU/kg five times a week) for 4 weeks. Kaplan–Meier survival curve was analyzed and MST was calculated for each group: THI0012 (n=3, MST=33 days) (black dashed); TBC3486 (n=7, MST=41 days) (red dashed); THI0012+VDL (n=6, MST=58 days) (black solid); TBC3486+VDL (n=7, MST=82 days) (red solid). *P<0.05, log-rank test.

To determine whether TBC3486 can prolong the survival of xenotolerant mice bearing human leukemia cells in vivo, LAX7R cells were injected into NOD/SCID hosts. Three days after leukemia cell transfer, mice received either TBC3486 or THI0012 (control) (10 mg/kg/d) daily for 2 weeks with two daily intraperitoneal injections to ensure stable plasma levels, with or without VDL chemotherapy. TBC3486-treatment (n=7) resulted in prolonged survival time compared with THI0012 control mice (n=3) (median survival time (MST)=41 vs 33 days, P=0.001). In combination with chemotherapy, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve indicated that TBC3486+VDL-treatment (n=6) resulted in a significantly prolonged survival time (compared with the VDL+THI0012 control (n=7) (MST=82 vs 58 days, P=0.0003; Figure 2d). TBC3486 preferentially inhibits the high-affinity form of the integrin α4.[4] It may thus interfere with the function of lymphocytes entertaining the inflammatory response in multiple sclerosis, but may not interfere with that of lymphocytes causing inflammatory bowel disease. Which β-integrin is the more relevant partner for α4 in the context of drug resistance in ALL is unclear. In addition, TBC3486 mimics VCAM-1 binding, inducing the high-affinity conformation of integrin α4; by contrast, natalizumab recognizes and blocks the ligand-binding moiety of α4 in any conformation and without affecting activation status. Whether, therefore, TBC3486-binding of integrin α4 might elicit outside-in signaling would have to be addressed in further studies. Although unknown off-target effects of the compound cannot be excluded, it should be emphasized that the control compound, THI0012, is structurally identical to TBC3486 except it is the opposite enantiomer. This simple change in stereochemistry eliminates its activity toward α4β1. The fact that this control compound has no activity in any of the in vitro or in vivo studies described here also argues that the efficacy of TBC3486 in these studies is directly related to its activity toward α4β1 integrin. Like many small molecules, TBC3486 is endowed with a rather shorter half-life, requiring more frequent dosing than natalizumab. A shorter half-life should likely be an advantage in leukemia treatment, but challenges at establishing the optimal timing of anti-integrin treatments (how often, how much and so on) relative to the chemotherapy must not be underestimated. Natalizumab led to the complete eradication of pre-B-ALL in our xenotransplant model in two out of three pre-B-ALL cases. By contrast, adjuvant treatment with TBC3486 was associated only with prolonged survival, not with leukemia cell eradication. Although formal side-by-side comparisons were not performed, this may at least in part be due to the differences in treatment schedules (TBC3486: twice daily for 2 weeks, natalizumab: once weekly for 4 weeks), but additional differences of the two compounds may also contribute. As the half-life of natalizumab is much longer, therapeutic drug levels are likely to be continuously maintained for the entire duration of the 4-week VDL cycle. Taken together, our data demonstrate that small-molecule inhibition of integrin α4 using TBC3486, currently in preclinical evaluation, is a promising approach for targeting chemotherapy-resistant leukemia. Further studies are warranted to understand and evaluate preclinically adjuvant small-molecule inhibition of integrins to overcome relapse of ALL.
  10 in total

1.  Differential efficacy of a synthetic antagonist of VLA-4 during the course of chronic relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Barbara Cannella; Stefanie Gaupp; Ronald G Tilton; Cedric S Raine
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 2.  The role of alpha 4-integrin in T lymphocyte migration into the inflamed and noninflamed central nervous system.

Authors:  B Engelhardt
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Integrin alpha4 blockade sensitizes drug resistant pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yao-Te Hsieh; Eun Ji Gang; Huimin Geng; Eugene Park; Sandra Huantes; Doreen Chudziak; Katrin Dauber; Paul Schaefer; Carlton Scharman; Hiroyuki Shimada; Seyedmehdi Shojaee; Lars Klemm; Reshmi Parameswaran; Mignon Loh; Eun-Suk Kang; Hong Hoe Koo; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Jacob Andrade; Gay M Crooks; Cheryl L Willman; Markus Müschen; Thalia Papayannopoulou; Nora Heisterkamp; Halvard Bönig; Yong-Mi Kim
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Leukemia stem cells and microenvironment: biology and therapeutic targeting.

Authors:  Marina Y Konopleva; Craig T Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Targeting survivin overcomes drug resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Eugene Park; Eun Ji Gang; Yao-Te Hsieh; Paul Schaefer; Sanna Chae; Lars Klemm; Sandra Huantes; Mignon Loh; Edward M Conway; Eun-Suk Kang; Hong Hoe Koo; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Nora Heisterkamp; Louis Pelus; Ganesan Keerthivasan; John Crispino; Michael Kahn; Markus Müschen; Yong-Mi Kim
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Potent in vivo suppression of inflammation by selectively targeting the high affinity conformation of integrin α4β1.

Authors:  Peter Vanderslice; Darren G Woodside; Amy R Caivano; E Radford Decker; Christy L Munsch; Sidney J Sherwood; Wanda S Lejeune; Yuko J Miyamoto; Bradley W McIntyre; Ronald G Tilton; Richard A F Dixon
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Integrin activation by dithiothreitol or Mn2+ induces a ligand-occupied conformation and exposure of a novel NH2-terminal regulatory site on the beta1 integrin chain.

Authors:  H Ni; A Li; N Simonsen; J A Wilkins
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-04-03       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Multiple activation states of VLA-4. Mechanistic differences between adhesion to CS1/fibronectin and to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

Authors:  A Masumoto; M E Hemler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Optimization of current and future therapy for autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Lawrence Steinman; Joan T Merrill; Iain B McInnes; Mark Peakman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Small-molecule inhibition of CBP/catenin interactions eliminates drug-resistant clones in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  E J Gang; Y-T Hsieh; J Pham; Y Zhao; C Nguyen; S Huantes; E Park; K Naing; L Klemm; S Swaminathan; E M Conway; L M Pelus; J Crispino; C G Mullighan; M McMillan; M Müschen; M Kahn; Y-M Kim
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 9.867

  10 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Normal and leukemic stem cell niches: insights and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Koen Schepers; Timothy B Campbell; Emmanuelle Passegué
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 2.  Eviction from the sanctuary: Development of targeted therapy against cell adhesion molecules in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Sonali P Barwe; Anthony Quagliano; Anilkumar Gopalakrishnapillai
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Understanding the bone marrow microenvironment in hematologic malignancies: A focus on chemokine, integrin, and extracellular vesicle signaling.

Authors:  Edward Allan Racela Sison; Peter Kurre; Yong-Mi Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.969

Review 4.  Integrins as therapeutic targets in the organ-specific metastasis of human malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Ruixia Huang; Einar K Rofstad
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-27

5.  G9a Correlates with VLA-4 Integrin and Influences the Migration of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells.

Authors:  Elena Madrazo; David Ruano; Lorea Abad; Estefanía Alonso-Gómez; Carmen Sánchez-Valdepeñas; África González-Murillo; Manuel Ramírez; Javier Redondo-Muñoz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Pharmacological Targeting of Cell Cycle, Apoptotic and Cell Adhesion Signaling Pathways Implicated in Chemoresistance of Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Dauren Alimbetov; Sholpan Askarova; Bauyrzhan Umbayev; Terence Davis; David Kipling
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Molecular Players in Hematologic Tumor Cell Trafficking.

Authors:  Javier Redondo-Muñoz; Angeles García-Pardo; Joaquin Teixidó
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Therapeutic Targeting of the Leukaemia Microenvironment.

Authors:  Vincent Kuek; Anastasia M Hughes; Rishi S Kotecha; Laurence C Cheung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Effects of CD49d-targeted antisense-oligonucleotide on α4 integrin expression and function of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells: Results of in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Yann Duchartre; Stefanie Bachl; Hye Na Kim; Eun Ji Gang; Solah Lee; Hsiao-Chuan Liu; Kirk Shung; Ruth Xu; Aaron Kruse; George Tachas; Halvard Bonig; Yong-Mi Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Chemoresistance: 3D Extracellular Matrices as Accomplices.

Authors:  Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Tina Jonker; Arielle Rowe; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Daniella Munro; Collet Dandara; Ambroise Wonkam; Dhirendra Govender; Bridget Calder; Nelson C Soares; Jonathan M Blackburn; M Iqbal Parker; Kevin Dzobo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.