AIMS: Significant alterations in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobials have been reported in critically ill patients. We describe PK parameters of imipenem in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia and evaluate several dosage regimens. METHODS: This French multicentre, prospective, open-label study was conducted in ICU patients with a presumptive diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacilli, who empirically received imipenem intravenously every 8 h. Plasma imipenem concentrations were measured during the fourth imipenem infusion using six samples (trough, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 8 h). Data were analysed with a population approach using the stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm in Monolix 4.2. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to evaluate the following six dosage regimens: 500, 750 or 1000 mg with administration every 6 or 8 h. The pharmacodynamic target was defined as the probability of achieving a fractional time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >40%. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included in the PK analysis. Imipenem concentration data were best described by a two-compartment model with three covariates (creatinine clearance, total bodyweight and serum albumin). Estimated clearance (between-subject variability) was 13.2 l h(-1) (38%) and estimated central volume 20.4 l (31%). At an MIC of 4 μg ml(-1) , the probability of achieving 40% fractional time > MIC was 91.8% for 0.5 h infusions of 750 mg every 6 h, 86.0% for 1000 mg every 8 h and 96.9% for 1000 mg every 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: This population PK model accurately estimated imipenem concentrations in ICU patients. The simulation showed that for these patients, the best dosage regimen of imipenem is 750 mg every 6 h and not 1000 mg every 8 h.
AIMS: Significant alterations in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobials have been reported in critically illpatients. We describe PK parameters of imipenem in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia and evaluate several dosage regimens. METHODS: This French multicentre, prospective, open-label study was conducted in ICU patients with a presumptive diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacilli, who empirically received imipenem intravenously every 8 h. Plasma imipenem concentrations were measured during the fourth imipenem infusion using six samples (trough, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 and 8 h). Data were analysed with a population approach using the stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm in Monolix 4.2. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to evaluate the following six dosage regimens: 500, 750 or 1000 mg with administration every 6 or 8 h. The pharmacodynamic target was defined as the probability of achieving a fractional time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >40%. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included in the PK analysis. Imipenem concentration data were best described by a two-compartment model with three covariates (creatinine clearance, total bodyweight and serum albumin). Estimated clearance (between-subject variability) was 13.2 l h(-1) (38%) and estimated central volume 20.4 l (31%). At an MIC of 4 μg ml(-1) , the probability of achieving 40% fractional time > MIC was 91.8% for 0.5 h infusions of 750 mg every 6 h, 86.0% for 1000 mg every 8 h and 96.9% for 1000 mg every 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: This population PK model accurately estimated imipenem concentrations in ICU patients. The simulation showed that for these patients, the best dosage regimen of imipenem is 750 mg every 6 h and not 1000 mg every 8 h.
Authors: Jared L Crandon; Robert E Ariano; Sheryl A Zelenitsky; Anthony M Nicasio; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Manuel E Herrera-Gutiérrez; Gemma Seller-Pérez; Esther Banderas-Bravo; Javier Muñoz-Bono; Miguel Lebrón-Gallardo; Juan F Fernandez-Ortega Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-07-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J G Coen van Hasselt; Matthew L Rizk; Mallika Lala; Cynthia Chavez-Eng; Sandra A G Visser; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof; Gauri Rao; Piet H van der Graaf Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Femke de Velde; Brenda C M de Winter; Michael N Neely; Walter M Yamada; Birgit C P Koch; Stephan Harbarth; Elodie von Dach; Teun van Gelder; Angela Huttner; Johan W Mouton Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Femke de Velde; Brenda C M de Winter; Michael N Neely; Jan Strojil; Walter M Yamada; Stephan Harbarth; Angela Huttner; Teun van Gelder; Birgit C P Koch; Anouk E Muller Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 6.321