Literature DB >> 24902836

Mass spectrometry-driven phosphoproteomics: patterning the systems biology mosaic.

Martin A Jünger1, Ruedi Aebersold.   

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is the best-studied posttranslational modification and plays a role in virtually every biological process. Phosphoproteomics is the analysis of protein phosphorylation on a proteome-wide scale, and mainly uses the same instrumentation and analogous strategies as conventional mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics. Measurements can be performed either in a discovery-type, also known as shotgun mode, or in a targeted manner which monitors a set of a priori known phosphopeptides, such as members of a signal transduction pathway, across biological samples. Here, we delineate the different experimental levels at which measures can be taken to optimize the scope, reliability, and information content of phosphoproteomic analyses. Various chromatographic and chemical protocols exist to physically enrich phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests of biological samples. Subsequent mass spectrometric analysis revolves around peptide ion fragmentation to generate sequence information and identify the backbone sequence of phosphopeptides as well as the phosphate group attachment site(s), and different modes of fragmentation like collision-induced dissociation (CID), electron transfer dissociation (ETD), and higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) have been established for phosphopeptide analysis. Computational tools are important for the identification and quantification of phosphopeptides and mapping of phosphorylation sites, the deposition of large-scale phosphoproteome datasets in public databases, and the extraction of biologically meaningful information by data mining, integration with other data types, and descriptive or predictive modeling. Finally, we discuss how orthogonal experimental approaches can be employed to validate newly identified phosphorylation sites on a biochemical, mechanistic, and physiological level.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24902836     DOI: 10.1002/wdev.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol        ISSN: 1759-7684            Impact factor:   5.814


  19 in total

1.  Posttranslational Protein Modifications in Plant Metabolism.

Authors:  Giulia Friso; Klaas J van Wijk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Sensitive measurement of total protein phosphorylation level in complex protein samples.

Authors:  Li Pan; Linna Wang; Chuan-Chih Hsu; Jiazhen Zhang; Anton Iliuk; W Andy Tao
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Design and characterization of mutant and wildtype huntingtin proteins produced from a toolkit of scalable eukaryotic expression systems.

Authors:  Rachel J Harding; Peter Loppnau; Suzanne Ackloo; Alexander Lemak; Ashley Hutchinson; Brittany Hunt; Alex S Holehouse; Jolene C Ho; Lixin Fan; Leticia Toledo-Sherman; Alma Seitova; Cheryl H Arrowsmith
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Multiplexed Phosphoproteomic Profiling Using Titanium Dioxide and Immunoaffinity Enrichments Reveals Complementary Phosphorylation Events.

Authors:  Anthony P Possemato; Joao A Paulo; Daniel Mulhern; Ailan Guo; Steven P Gygi; Sean A Beausoleil
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Proteome complexity and the forces that drive proteome imbalance.

Authors:  J Wade Harper; Eric J Bennett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Comparison of Statistical Tests and Power Analysis for Phosphoproteomics Data.

Authors:  Lei J Ding; Hannah M Schlüter; Matthew J Szucs; Rushdy Ahmad; Zheyang Wu; Weifeng Xu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  High-throughput and high-sensitivity phosphoproteomics with the EasyPhos platform.

Authors:  Sean J Humphrey; Ozge Karayel; David E James; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Phosphoproteomics reveals novel modes of function and inter-relationships among PIKKs in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Sapir Schlam-Babayov; Ariel Bensimon; Michal Harel; Tamar Geiger; Ruedi Aebersold; Yael Ziv; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Phospho-protein Analysis in Adherent Cells Using Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Renu Sharma; Amit Sharma; Atul Kumar; Bithiah Grace Jaganathan
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-10-20

Review 10.  Combining Mass Spectrometry-Based Phosphoproteomics with a Network-Based Approach to Reveal FLT3-Dependent Mechanisms of Chemoresistance.

Authors:  Giusj Monia Pugliese; Sara Latini; Giorgia Massacci; Livia Perfetto; Francesca Sacco
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.