| Literature DB >> 24900978 |
Yau-Yau Wai1, Wen-Chuin Hsu2, Hon-Chung Fung3, Jiann-Der Lee4, Hsiao-Lung Chan4, Ming-Lun Tsai5, Yu-Chun Lin1, Yih-Ru Wu3, Leslie Ying6, Jiun-Jie Wang7.
Abstract
RATIONALE ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24900978 PMCID: PMC4036605 DOI: 10.1155/2014/713079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
General characteristics of the study participants.
| Controls | Dysexecutive | Amnestic | AD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Age (years) | 67.2 ± 5.6 | 65.9 ± 7.6 | 68.6 ± 8.3 | 73.9 ± 9.4 |
| Range | 61–80 | 50–84 | 56–84 | 54–83 |
| Median | 65.5 | 65 | 69 | 76.5 |
| Sex (males/females) | 18/12 | 12/18 | 17/13 | 12/18 |
| Education (years) | 10.1 ± 4.7 | 8.0 ± 3.5 | 8.3 ± 5.3 | 7.3 ± 6.4 |
| Clinical dementia rating score | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.22 | 0.47 ± 0.13 | 1.00 ± 0.57 |
| Apolipoprotein E status | ||||
|
| 2 | 4 | 11 | 5 |
|
| 28 | 23 | 16 | 23 |
| Unknown | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Data are given as means ± standard deviation or counts, as appropriate.
Neuropsychological test scores.
| Controls | Apolipoprotein E | Amnestic MCI apolipoprotein E | Sum | Dysexecutive MCI | AD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean global score | ||||||
| Mini-mental status examination | 28.23 (1.30) | 25.25 (3.87) | 25.09 (4.18) | 25.10 (3.87) | 27.63 (1.47) | 15.07 (6.34) |
| Mean memory score | ||||||
| Word sequence learning-recall | 3.17 (1.93) | 0.47 (0.64) | 0.55 (0.93) | 0.45 (0.74) | 2.00 (1.68) | 0.04 (0.20) |
| Logic memory II | 11.60 (2.72) | 8.25 (3.66) | 8.18 (4.21) | 7.97 (3.72) | 9.87 (2.42) | 3.15 (1.87) |
| Mean executive function score | ||||||
| Semantic association of verbal | 33.40 (6.82) | 31.81 (4.04)* | 25.73 (7.16)* | 29.57 (6.03) | 32.83 (7.37) | 14.55 (6.20) |
| Wisconsin card sorting test | 5.20 (1.13) | 3.67 (1.91) | 3.82 (1.89) | 3.69 (1.77) | 2.60 (1.35) | 1.88 (2.76) |
| Mean visuospatial score | ||||||
| 3D block construction models | 28.6 (0.77) | 27.31 (2.60) | 26.91 (4.11) | 27.27 (3.1) | 28.03 (1.65) | 18.41 (10.50) |
| Mean language score | ||||||
| Object naming test | 16.00 (0.00) | 15.94 (0.25) | 16.00 (0.00) | 15.97 (0.18) | 15.97 (0.18) | 13.13 (3.65) |
Data are given as means (standard deviation); *Significant differences at P < 0.05 (P = 0.0225).
Figure 1Fractional anisotropy in the white matter regions of the study participants. Compared with normal controls, fractional anisotropy is reduced within the white matter skeleton of both patients with amnestic MCI (a) and AD (b). The left of the figure corresponds to the subject's right side.
Figure 2Radial diffusivity in the white matter regions of the study participants. Compared with normal controls, radial diffusivity is increased within the white matter skeleton of both patients with amnestic MCI (a) and AD (b). The pattern of such changes is consistent with the observed reductions in fractional anisotropy. The arrows indicate the locations of the fiber tracts showing significant changes.
Figure 3MD and longitudinal diffusivity in the white matter regions in patients with AD. Compared with normal controls, MD (a) and longitudinal diffusivity (b) are significantly increased within the white matter skeleton of patients with AD. The observed increases are largely consistent with the corresponding reductions in fractional anisotropy.
Figure 4Effect of the apolipoprotein E ε4 status on white matter changes in amnestic MCI patients. The diffusion indices are examined in amnestic MCI patients after stratification according to apolipoprotein E ε4 status. In (a), the decrease of fractional anisotropy is marked in blue, while the increase in MD is reported in red. In (b), the increases of LD and RD are marked in blue and red, respectively.