Literature DB >> 24899677

Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction.

Davis Forman1, Amita Raj2, Duane C Button3, Kevin E Power4.   

Abstract

Human studies have not assessed corticospinal excitability of an upper-limb prime mover during arm cycling. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether supraspinal and/or spinal motoneuron excitability of the biceps brachii was different between arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction. We hypothesized that spinal motoneuron excitability would be higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction. Supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES) of the corticospinal tract, respectively. TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMES-induced cervicomedullary-evoked potentials (CMEPs) were assessed at three separate positions (3, 6, and 12 o'clock relative to a clock face) during arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction. MEP amplitudes were 7.2 and 8.8% maximum amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (Mmax) larger during arm cycling compared with a tonic contraction at the 3 (P < 0.001) and 6 o'clock (P < 0.001) positions, respectively. There was no difference between tasks during elbow extension (12 o'clock). CMEP amplitudes were 5.2% Mmax larger during arm cycling compared with a tonic contraction at the 3 o'clock position (P < 0.001) with no differences seen at midflexion (6 o'clock) or extension (12 o'clock). The data indicate an increase in the excitability of corticospinal neurons, which ultimately project to biceps brachii during the elbow flexion portion of arm cycling, and increased spinal motoneuron excitability at the onset of elbow flexion during arm cycling. We conclude that supraspinal and spinal motoneuron excitability are phase- and task-dependent.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motoneuron; transcranial; transmastoid

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899677     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00210.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation of corticospinal input to the legs by arm and leg cycling in people with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R Zhou; L Alvarado; S Kim; S L Chong; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Excitability of the infraspinatus, but not the middle deltoid, is affected by shoulder elevation angle.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Anita Christie; Andrew Karduna
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent.

Authors:  E J Lockyer; R J Benson; A P Hynes; L R Alcock; A J Spence; D C Button; K E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Sherlock Holmes and the curious case of the human locomotor central pattern generator.

Authors:  Taryn Klarner; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Endurance-exercise training adaptations in spinal motoneurones: potential functional relevance to locomotor output and assessment in humans.

Authors:  Kevin E Power; Evan J Lockyer; Alberto Botter; Taian Vieira; Duane C Button
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Interhemispheric inhibition is different during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction.

Authors:  Chris T Compton; Evan J Lockyer; Ryan J Benson; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Location-specific cutaneous electrical stimulation of the footsole modulates corticospinal excitability to the plantarflexors and dorsiflexors during standing.

Authors:  Gagan Gill; Davis A Forman; Joanna E Reeves; Janet L Taylor; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-07

10.  Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning and motor memory consolidation in healthy old adults.

Authors:  K M M Berghuis; M P Veldman; S Solnik; G Koch; I Zijdewind; T Hortobágyi
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.