Literature DB >> 25814379

Excitability of the infraspinatus, but not the middle deltoid, is affected by shoulder elevation angle.

Yin-Liang Lin1, Anita Christie, Andrew Karduna.   

Abstract

Although both the rotator cuff and deltoid muscle serve as shoulder abductors, they play different roles in shoulder movement. While the deltoid is a primary abductor, the rotator cuff is a stabilizer. They have different anatomic structures for force production and demonstrate different neuromuscular control at different shoulder angles, as measured by electromyographic activity. Corticospinal excitability may be associated with different neuromuscular control of the deltoid and rotator cuff at different angles. The purpose of this study was to investigate how shoulder joint position influences the corticospinal excitability of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to measure the corticospinal excitability of the middle deltoid and infraspinatus at 0° and 90° of arm elevation. Three parameters, a plateau value, exponential parameter, and threshold, were calculated from the input-output curve of the corticospinal pathway. The plateau value of the infraspinatus was significantly higher at 90° of arm elevation, while there is no difference in the excitability in the middle deltoid between elevation angles. The plateau value of the middle deltoid at 90° was 5 % lower than that at 0°, but the plateau value of infraspinatus at 90° was 55 % higher than that at 0°. This suggests that the modulation of excitability varies with shoulder angle and reveals different neurological mechanism for the roles of the deltoid and rotator cuff.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25814379     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4255-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Dynamic glenohumeral stability provided by the rotator cuff muscles in the mid-range and end-range of motion. A study in cadavera.

Authors:  S B Lee; K J Kim; S W O'Driscoll; B F Morrey; K N An
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Changes in corticomotor excitability of hand muscles in relation to static shoulder positions.

Authors:  F Ginanneschi; F Del Santo; F Dominici; F Gelli; R Mazzocchio; A Rossi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Rotator cuff muscle architecture: implications for glenohumeral stability.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Eric R Hentzen; Laura H Smallwood; Robert K Eastlack; Katherine A Burns; Donald C Fithian; Jan Friden; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Contributions of the individual muscles of the shoulder to glenohumeral joint stability during abduction.

Authors:  Takashi Yanagawa; Cheryl J Goodwin; Kevin B Shelburne; J Erik Giphart; Michael R Torry; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  The combined dynamic and static contributions to subacromial impingement. A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  L Z Payne; X H Deng; E V Craig; P A Torzilli; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Persistent inward currents in spinal motoneurons and their influence on human motoneuron firing patterns.

Authors:  C J Heckman; Michael Johnson; Carol Mottram; Jenna Schuster
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Anterior glenohumeral stabilization factors: progressive effects in a biomechanical model.

Authors:  D M Malicky; L J Soslowsky; R B Blasier; Y Shyr
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Comparison of corticomotor excitability during visuomotor dynamic and static tasks.

Authors:  Alan J Pearce; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 9.  Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Philip W McClure; Andrew R Karduna
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  U Ziemann; S Lönnecker; B J Steinhoff; W Paulus
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  2 in total

1.  Corticomotor excitability of gluteus maximus and hip extensor strength: The influence of sex.

Authors:  Yo Shih; Beth E Fisher; Jason J Kutch; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.397

2.  VETA: An Open-Source Matlab-Based Toolbox for the Collection and Analysis of Electromyography Combined With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Nicko Jackson; Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.