Literature DB >> 24899673

Rapid prediction of biomechanical costs during action decisions.

Ignasi Cos1, Julie Duque2, Paul Cisek3.   

Abstract

When given a choice between actions that yield the same reward, we tend to prefer the one that requires the least effort. Recent studies have shown that humans are remarkably accurate at evaluating the effort of potential reaching actions and can predict the subtle energetic demand caused by the nonisotropic biomechanical properties of the arm. In the present study, we investigated the time course over which such information is computed and comes to influence decisions. Two independent approaches were used. First, subjects performed a reach decision task in which the time interval for deciding between two candidate reaching actions was varied from 200 to 800 ms. Second, we measured motor-evoked potential (MEPs) to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) to probe the evolving decision at different times after stimulus presentation. Both studies yielded a consistent conclusion: that a prediction of the effort associated with candidate movements is computed very quickly and influences decisions within 200 ms after presentation of the candidate actions. Furthermore, whereas the MEPs measured 150 ms after stimulus presentation were well correlated with the choices that subjects ultimately made, later in the trial the MEP amplitudes were primarily related to the muscular requirements of the chosen movement. This suggests that corticospinal excitability (CSE) initially reflects a competition between candidate actions and later changes to reflect the processes of preparing to implement the winning action choice.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; decision-making; human; motor control; motor intention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899673     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00147.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  34 in total

1.  Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Yupeng Xiao; Sujin Kim; Toshinori Yoshioka; James Gordon; Rieko Osu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice.

Authors:  Romy S Bakker; Roel H A Weijer; Robert J van Beers; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ludovica Labruna; Christian Cazares; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  The sequential encoding of competing action goals involves dynamic restructuring of motor plans in working memory.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Natasha A R Bowman; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Decisions in motion: vestibular contributions to saccadic target selection.

Authors:  L Rincon-Gonzalez; L P J Selen; K Halfwerk; M Koppen; B D Corneil; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reaching decisions during ongoing movements.

Authors:  Julien Michalski; Andrea M Green; Paul Cisek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Ever-ready for action: Spatial effects on motor system excitability.

Authors:  Matthieu M de Wit; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Decision-making in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.