Nam Chull Paik1. 1. Department of Radiology, Arumdaun Wooldul Spine Hospital, 647-4 Sinjeong 2-dong, Nam-gu, Ulsan, 680-828, Republic of Korea, pncspine@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test whether radiation dose reduction in CTF-guided LIESI would be achieved by replacing the preliminary planning CT with a spot CTF while still maintaining technical performance. METHODS: This retrospective study included a review of 247 consecutive procedures performed on 241 patients before (comparison group: n = 124) and after (study group: n = 123) instituting the above-mentioned the protocol modification. The patient (age, sex, body diameter, and level injected) and performance (procedure time, number of CTF acquisitions, and DLP) characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total DLP of the study group (median 4.94 mGy · cm) was significantly reduced compared to that of the comparison group (median 31.78 mGy · cm, P < 0.001). The numbers of CTF acquisitions needed for needle placement and epidurography were very similar for both groups (median 3, P = 0.685). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for the study group (5:14 ± 1:06 min) compared to the comparison group (5:53 ± 1:19 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When conducting CTF-guided LIESIs, a significant radiation dose reduction (median 84.5% in DLP, P < 0.001) can be achieved by minimizing the preliminary planning examination, without compromising the number of CTF acquisitions and the procedure time. KEY POINTS: Majority of radiation is delivered during the preliminary planning image acquisition. Spot CTF scan can replace the preliminary planning helical examination. Patient dose can be reduced to as low as 0.09 mSv.
OBJECTIVES: To test whether radiation dose reduction in CTF-guided LIESI would be achieved by replacing the preliminary planning CT with a spot CTF while still maintaining technical performance. METHODS: This retrospective study included a review of 247 consecutive procedures performed on 241 patients before (comparison group: n = 124) and after (study group: n = 123) instituting the above-mentioned the protocol modification. The patient (age, sex, body diameter, and level injected) and performance (procedure time, number of CTF acquisitions, and DLP) characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total DLP of the study group (median 4.94 mGy · cm) was significantly reduced compared to that of the comparison group (median 31.78 mGy · cm, P < 0.001). The numbers of CTF acquisitions needed for needle placement and epidurography were very similar for both groups (median 3, P = 0.685). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for the study group (5:14 ± 1:06 min) compared to the comparison group (5:53 ± 1:19 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When conducting CTF-guided LIESIs, a significant radiation dose reduction (median 84.5% in DLP, P < 0.001) can be achieved by minimizing the preliminary planning examination, without compromising the number of CTF acquisitions and the procedure time. KEY POINTS: Majority of radiation is delivered during the preliminary planning image acquisition. Spot CTF scan can replace the preliminary planning helical examination. Patient dose can be reduced to as low as 0.09 mSv.
Authors: John A Bauhs; Thomas J Vrieze; Andrew N Primak; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Radiographics Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Sangroh Kim; Greta Toncheva; Colin Anderson-Evans; Billy K Huh; Linda Gray; Terry Yoshizumi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Shuai Leng; Jodie A Christner; Stephanie K Carlson; Megan Jacobsen; Thomas J Vrieze; Thomas D Atwell; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J S Schauberger; P G Kranz; K R Choudhury; J D Eastwood; L Gray; J K Hoang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fabian Henry Jürgen Elsholtz; Lars-Arne Schaafs; Christoph Erxleben; Bernd Hamm; Stefan Markus Niehues Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.469