Plant-derived polyphenols have been shown to influence bone turnover and bone properties in the estrogen-depleted state. We used a crossover design in ovariectomized rats (n = 16 rats for each diet) to investigate the effect of supplementation of two doses each of blueberry, plum, grape, grape seed extract, and resveratrol on bone. We tested the aglycon and glucoside forms of genistein to quantify differences in efficacy on bone calcium retention. Rats were given an intravenous dose of ⁴⁵Ca to prelabel bone, and bone calcium retention was assessed by urinary excretion of ⁴⁵Ca:Ca ratio during an intervention period compared with nonintervention. Genistein aglycon increased bone calcium retention significantly (p<0.05) more than the glucoside (22% vs 13%, respectively). Plum extract (0.45% w/w total dietary polyphenols) and resveratrol (0.2% w/w total dietary polyphenols) were also effective, increasing bone calcium retention by 20% (p=0.0153) and 14% (p=0.0012), respectively. Several polyphenolic-rich diets improved bone calcium retention.
Plant-derived polyphenols have been shown to influence bone turnover and bone properties in the estrogen-depleted state. We used a crossover design in ovariectomized rats (n = 16 rats for each diet) to investigate the effect of supplementation of two doses each of blueberry, plum, grape, grape seed extract, and resveratrol on bone. We tested the aglycon and glucoside forms of genistein to quantify differences in efficacy on bone calcium retention. Rats were given an intravenous dose of ⁴⁵Ca to prelabel bone, and bone calcium retention was assessed by urinary excretion of ⁴⁵Ca:Ca ratio during an intervention period compared with nonintervention. Genisteinaglycon increased bone calcium retention significantly (p<0.05) more than the glucoside (22% vs 13%, respectively). Plum extract (0.45% w/w total dietary polyphenols) and resveratrol (0.2% w/w total dietary polyphenols) were also effective, increasing bone calcium retention by 20% (p=0.0153) and 14% (p=0.0012), respectively. Several polyphenolic-rich diets improved bone calcium retention.
Entities:
Keywords:
bone calcium retention; bone resorption; genistein aglycon; genistein glucoside; plant-derived polyphenols
Various plant sources
of polyphenolic compounds have been studied
for their ability to prevent postmenopausal bone loss associated with
estrogen deficiency. The link between soy consumption in the Asian
diet and reduced fracture risk[1] has sparked
many studies examining soy isoflavones and postmenopausal bone health.
More recently, plum, blueberry, and grape products have also been
implicated in preventing postmenopausal bone loss due to their polyphenolic
components.[2−6]In Western countries, soy is not consumed as often or in sufficient
quantities to match the soy consumed in Asia, where beneficial effects
to bone have been observed. In addition, soy in Western countries
is typically consumed as an ingredient or in supplemental form that
contains extracted isoflavones from soy rather than in whole soy foods.[7] The ability of soy isoflavones to attenuate bone
resorption in an estrogen deficient state remains controversial.[8] Discrepancies have been attributed to a number
of factors including an individual’s ability to convert daidzein
to equol, the effect of food matrix on bioavailability of isoflavones
compared with extracted isoflavones, and specific isoflavone composition.
In foods, isoflavones exist as glycosides and require cleavage of
the sugar moiety in the gut to be absorbed in the intestine.[9] Although there have been contrary reports of
bioavailability of glycoside compared with aglycon forms of genistein,[10,11] there is interest in comparing glycoside to aglycon forms for bone
health as the aglycon form was used in various studies that have demonstrated
a strong bone preserving effect in postmenopausal women.[12−15] The presence of the sugar moiety may have an influence on where
the isoflavone is absorbed in the gut and how the isoflavone is subsequently
conjugated inside the body.Isoflavones and other phenolics
have demonstrated estrogenic activity[16,17] and are being
investigated for their biological effect on the estrogen-depleted
state. Depletion of estrogen results in a marked increase in osteoclastogenesis,
causing bone resorption. During this postmenopausal period, bone formation
lags behind resorption, and net bone loss ensues.[18]There is emerging evidence to suggest that certain
fruits, vegetables,
and other dietary compounds found in the Western diet may be protective
to bone, especially from prune, grape products, and blueberries.[19−21] Grape seed extract has also shown promise in maintaining bone health
as supplementation with grape seed extract was able to recover bone
lost while on a calcium deficient diet in rats.[22] Dried plum is one of the most extensively studied botanicals
for its role in bone health because of a potentially anabolic effect
in bone. Dried plum was very effective in protecting bone in ovariectomized
(OVX) rats when compared with the effect of intermittent teriparatide
(parathyroid hormone 1–34) administration, which is the most
effective anabolic drug therapy currently available for osteoporosis
treatment.[3] Plum, as a daily supplement
of 100 g/d dried plum for one year, was able to increase bone mineral
density (BMD) in the spine and ulna of postmenopausal women compared
with those who were supplemented with an equal amount of dried apple.[23] While these extracts appear to be diverse, they
are rich sources of specific polyphenol forms including quercetin,
anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, hydroxycinnamates, and resveratrol,
which can be classified as possible bioactive agents responsible for
observed bone health benefits associated with these foods. For example,
resveratrol, found in grape products, extracts, and supplements, increased
bone formation markers and decreased expression of receptor activator
of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) in human primary monocytes,[21] showing potential to alter osteoclastogenesis.Although the bioactive foods and ingredients described above have
been shown to benefit bone by traditional measures of bone density
and material properties, these approaches require chronic feeding
and terminal measures. This has largely prevented comparisons among
multiple diets and dose response effects. The aims of this study were
to directly compare botanical sources and to study the effective dose
of extracts to increase bone calcium retention in OVX rats using a
novel technology that does not require sacrifice and evaluates responses
quickly so that multiple comparisons can be efficiently tested. This
involves prelabeling bones with 45Ca as we have done previously
with 41Ca in human studies[24,25] as a means
of screening botanical extracts for their ability to improve bone
calcium retention. By injecting rats with 45Ca, allowing
the isotope to incorporate into bone, and quantifying the amount of 45Ca in urine, a direct measure of net calcium tracer lost
from bone is obtained. The long half-life of 45Ca (163
days) allows multiple diets to be compared using a crossover design
in the same rat, providing greater power to detect differences among
diets. This method allows for screening of numerous diets on a relatively
small number of rats during a short time period.The method
for determining bone calcium retention was derived from
a well-established protocol using another bone seeking tracer, 3H-tetracycline,[19,26−28] and adapted by us for calcium tracers in rats[29−31] and humans.[32]3H-tetracycline was the tracer of
choice initially because it was assumed that it assessed only bone
resorption from prelabeled bones in rats because it attaches tightly
to hydroxyapatite and was slow to release.[33−35] However, we
showed through kinetic modeling of both 3H-tetracycline
and calcium tracers that both isotopes leave bone during bone resorption
and can re-enter bone during bone formation. Our findings suggest
that these two tracers give comparable values and that net bone calcium
retention is a more accurate description of what is being measured
with bone seeking tracers.[30] Mühlbauer
and Fleish[36] evolved the method to use
daily measures of urinary 3H-tetracycline from prelabeled
bone of young rats given multiple injections of the tracer in order
to continuously monitor bone resorption through 10-day diet periods
and 10-day washout periods using a crossover design. We established
that older OVX rats and a single isotope administration could be used
in a study that evaluated effects of time of stabilization to OVX
and time from dose on tracer behavior.[31] We further validated urinary tracer excretion against bone disappearance
of the tracer[31] and adequacy of 10-day
diet and washout periods.[29] Quantifying
the urinary tracer appearance of a bone label enables rapid screening
and multiple comparisons of efficacy of diets designed to improve
bone calcium retention.We hypothesized that both source and
dose effects would be observed
through testing high and low doses of various extracts from grape
seed, grape, and blueberry, as well as plum powder, and resveratrol.
We also used this screening method to determine whether genistein
in an aglycon form is more effective at increasing bone calcium retention
than its glucoside counterpart.
Materials
and Methods
Chemicals
A retrospective analysis of phenolic compounds
from grape, blueberry, and plum extract was conducted after the conclusion
of the study. Extracts were stored at −80 °C, reconstituted
in 2% formic acid in ddH2O at ∼1 mg/mL, and analyzed
for key phenolic components by LC–MS as described by Song et
al.[37]
Rats
Forty-four
OVX Sprague Dawley rats (3 month old)
were shipped from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN) and given approximately
30 days to acclimate to their environment, and to stabilize hormone
changes post-OVX, while being fed AIN93-M polyphenol-free diet (soybean
oil was replaced with corn oil) and distilled water ad libitum. The
rats were housed individually in a humidity- and temperature-controlled
room with a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle. Food intake was monitored
twice weekly, and body weight was recorded weekly. All procedures
performed on rats were approved by and in compliance with the standards
set by Purdue University’s Animal Care and Use Committee.
Study Design
The study design (Figure 1) was a randomized, crossover intervention trial to evaluate
12 different polyphenolic-containing diets on bone turnover. The rats
were randomized into one of three groups: (1) 16 rats received six
diets of plum, blueberry, and grape seed extract at two doses, (2)
16 rats received six diets of grape extract and resveratrol at two
doses each, and Novasoy (glycosylated soy) and Fosteum (genisteinaglycon) at a single dose, and (3) 12 rats received no treatment to
establish unperturbed 45Ca excretion over time to verify
that the regression lines computed from the nondiet periods were not
confounded by diets for both calcium retention and the biomarker of
bone turnover. Within each arm, the diets were randomized by polyphenolic
source and then by dose.
Figure 1
Study design. Forty-four rats were designated
into one of three
study arms. Rats in arm 1 (n = 16) received blueberry
and plum fruit powder and grape seed extract to compare the effect
of polyphenols in the whole fruit. Rats in arm 2 (n = 16) received whole fruit polyphenols from grape to compare against
the isolated resveratrol polyphenols. Rats in arm 2 were also given
genistein in the aglycon form and glycosylated soy to determine the
effect of conjugation. Rats in arm 3 (n = 12) were
not given a dietary botanical to establish an unperturbed excretion
of 45Ca excretion.
Study design. Forty-four rats were designated
into one of three
study arms. Rats in arm 1 (n = 16) received blueberry
and plumfruit powder and grape seed extract to compare the effect
of polyphenols in the whole fruit. Rats in arm 2 (n = 16) received whole fruit polyphenols from grape to compare against
the isolated resveratrol polyphenols. Rats in arm 2 were also given
genistein in the aglycon form and glycosylated soy to determine the
effect of conjugation. Rats in arm 3 (n = 12) were
not given a dietary botanical to establish an unperturbed excretion
of 45Ca excretion.The rats were injected with 70 μCi of 45Ca in
saline via a tail vein catheter approximately 30 days after arrival,
moved to metabolic cages, and allowed 29 days for the isotope to be
eliminated from soft tissues and fully incorporated into bone. Urine
was collected for 24 h twice weekly during this equilibration period.
The metabolic cages contained screens that prevented food debris and
feces from contaminating the urine; the cages were cleaned once every
3 days throughout the duration of the experiment. Following the equilibration
period, a baseline level of urinary tracer excretion was assessed
during an initial 10 day baseline period (Figure 2), which was followed by a 10 day intervention and 10 day
washout period. For each diet, there was n = 16 rats
with 10 days of 24 h urine samples for each rat. The intervention
and washout collections were repeated for 6 total intervention/washout
cycles, and the total duration of the study was 189 days. Throughout
the baseline, intervention, and washout, urine was collected for 24
h for 10 days during the intervention and 6 days during the washout.
Urine was analyzed as a 24 h sample and was not pooled over multiple
days. Food intake and body weight were monitored every 5 days. Blood
was taken at the end of each diet and washout via the saphenous vein,
and serum was stored at −80 °C to assay for bone-specific
alkaline phosphatase. The urine collected at the end of each intervention
and washout period was stabilized with 1% ascorbic acid at a 4:1 ratio
immediately after the 24 h collection period, stored at −80
°C, and used to assay for total polyphenols and cross-linked
N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx). Rats were killed using an
excess of CO2.
Figure 2
Study timeline for arrival of ovariectomized
(OVX) rats, dosing
with 45Ca, and urine and blood collection pattern.
Study timeline for arrival of ovariectomized
(OVX) rats, dosing
with 45Ca, and urine and blood collection pattern.
Diets
All diets
were formulated to be isocaloric and
to have approximately equal macronutrient, vitamin, and mineral content.
The AIN93-M polyphenol-free diet[38] (Table 1) was used as a basal diet with the replacement
of soybean oil with corn oil to prevent confounding from residual
isoflavones. A higher amount of corn starch than in the original AIN93-M
diet was used to facilitate the incorporation of up to 25% fruit powder,
while maintaining the ability to pellet the diets. Research Diets,
Inc. (New Brunswick, NJ), dry blended the extracts and fruit powders
into the basal diet prior to pelleting the diets. Each extract or
fruit powder was added to the diet to create two doses of varying
polyphenolic content and stored at −20 °C. The diets were
formulated based on the goal of delivering 0.2% and 1% w/w total polyphenols
for each extract where possible (Table 2).
The total polyphenol content in the extracts was determined using
the Folin–Ciocalteu method;[39] however,
levels of resveratrol and soy isoflavones were added based on the
manufacturers’ specified levels of resveratrol and total isoflavones,
respectively.
Table 1
Modified AIN93-M Diet
ingredient
gm/kg
casein
140
l-cystine
1.8
corn starcha
495.692
maltodextrina
125
sucrose
100
cellulose
50
corn oilb
40
tert-butylhydroquinone
0.008
mineral mixc
35
vitamin mix
10
choline bitartrate
2.5
Modified from AIN93-M diet to enable
pelleting while replacing up to 25% of corn starch with fruit powders.
Soybean oil in AIN93-M diet
replaced
with corn oil to avoid residual soy isoflavone interaction.
Mineral mix contains phosphorus
at 3000 mg/kg diet and calcium at 5000 mg/kg diet.
Table 2
Botanical and Total
Polyphenol Composition
in Modified AIN93-M Diet
% w/w
diet
botanical (% total polyphenols in extract)
exptl dose
product
total polyphenols
grape seed extract (82.7)
high
1.2
1
low
0.25
0.2
pluma (2.22)
high
20
0.45
low
9
0.2
blueberryb (1.65)
high
25
0.4
low
9
0.15
grape (32.8)
high
3
1
low
0.6
0.2
resveratrol
(99.9)
high
0.2
0.2
low
0.1
0.1
genistein aglycon (6.67)
aglycon
0.6
0.04
glycosylated soyc (40.0)
glucoside
0.1
0.04
Corn starch and
cellulose in the
AIN93-M diet were replaced by carbohydrates and fiber from plum powder.
Corn starch in the modified
AIN93-M
diet was replaced with maltodextrin from blueberry powder.
Additional 2960 IU of vitamin D/kg
diet to match Fosteum (genistein aglycon).
Modified from AIN93-M diet to enable
pelleting while replacing up to 25% of corn starch with fruit powders.Soybean oil in AIN93-M diet
replaced
with corn oil to avoid residual soy isoflavone interaction.Mineral mix contains phosphorus
at 3000 mg/kg diet and calcium at 5000 mg/kg diet.Corn starch and
cellulose in the
AIN93-M diet were replaced by carbohydrates and fiber from plum powder.Corn starch in the modified
AIN93-M
diet was replaced with maltodextrin from blueberry powder.Additional 2960 IU of vitamin D/kg
diet to match Fosteum (genisteinaglycon).We could achieve this goal with grape seed extract
(Sensient, Indianapolis,
IN) and grape skin extract (Sensient, Indianapolis, IN), which were
both formulated to deliver 0.2% and 1% w/w total dietary polyphenols
in the low and high doses, respectively. The blueberry and plum powder
had lower phenolic content; therefore, these were added to the diet
at levels that have been shown to be effective in bone.[3−6] The blueberry powder (Sensient, Indianapolis, IN) was added at levels
of 9% and 25% w/w in the diet (delivering 0.15% and 0.40% w/w total
dietary polyphenols, respectively) and plum powder (donated by the
California Dried Plum Board, Los Altos, CA) was added at 9% and 20%
w/w diet to deliver 0.20% and 0.45% w/w total dietary polyphenols,
respectively. The added carbohydrates from the blueberry and plum
powders were balanced by removing corn starch from the diet formula.
Additionally, cellulose was removed to balance the added fiber in
the plum powder. Resveratrol and isoflavones were added at lower levels
than the fruit powders and extracts because they are isolated components
rather than a complex botanical matrix. Resveratrol (Chromadex, Inc.,
Irvine, CA) was added at 0.1% and 0.2% w/w total dietary polyphenols.
Novasoy (Archer Daniels Midland Company, Decatur, IL), which contains
genistein glycoside plus other isoflavones, and Fosteum (Primus Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Scottsdale, AZ), which is genisteinaglycon, were added to the
diet to deliver an equivalent amount of total isoflavone content (0.04%
w/w total dietary polyphenols) and to be consistent with the range
of doses published in similar studies.[40,41] The diets delivered 5000 mg/kg diet calcium
and 5000 mg/kg diet total phosphorus. Vitamin D was added to the Novasoy
(glycosylated soy) diet at 2960 IU/kg diet to match the vitamin D
present in the Fosteum supplement.
45Ca and Total
Calcium in Urine
Urine was
centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, decanted, and diluted
to the nearest 0.5 mL with ultrapure water; the total volume was recorded.
Scintillation vials were prepared with 15 mL of Ecolite(+) (MP Biomedicals
LLC., Solon, OH) and 1 mL of urine, and 45Ca was measured
on a Beckman LS 6500 scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments, Inc.,
Fullerton, CA). The 45Ca values were corrected for decay
and were reported as a percentage of original dose. Urinary total
calcium was determined by vortexing, diluting, and analyzing urine
samples on the atomic absorption spectrometer, AAnalyst 300 (PerkinElmer
Instruments, Waltham, MA). For each 24 h urine sample of each rat,
the ratio of percent dose 45Ca to milligrams of total calcium
was determined as the 45Ca:Ca ratio. 45Ca:Ca
excretion during intervention was compared with 45Ca:Ca
excretion during nonintervention periods to determine percent bone
calcium retention due to dietary polyphenols.
Biochemical Markers of
Bone Turnover
Urine from day
10 of each intervention and washout period was stored at −80
°C for cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) analysis.
Urine NTx was assayed in triplicate using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) from Wampole Laboratories R, Inc. (Princeton, NJ). The
microtiter plate in the kit was precoated with an antibody specific
to NTx. Samples and standards were added, followed by a series of
reagents designed to produce a color change in the wells containing
NTx. Bound NTx was analyzed spectrophotometrically at a wavelength
of 450 nm, and concentration of NTx was determined by comparison to
a standard curve.Blood was taken at the end of each botanical
diet period and washout period, and serum bone alkaline phosphatase
was assayed using an ELISA from MyBioSource (San Diego, Ca). Serum
samples were diluted 2-fold with saline and added to the wells of
a microtiter plate that were precoated with an antibody specific to
bone alkaline phosphatase. A series of reagents were added to produce
a color change in the wells that contained bone alkaline phosphatase.
Bone alkaline phosphatase was analyzed spectrophotometrically at 450
nm, and the concentration of bone alkaline phosphatase was determined
by comparison to a standard curve.
Total Polyphenol Analysis
To confirm the dose dependent
increase in polyphenol absorption from diets, urinary total polyphenols
were quantified following solid phase extraction based on a modification
of methods as described by Medina-Remón et al.[42] Briefly, urine samples were diluted to approximately 1
mL using a 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 3.0). Strata-X polymeric
reversed phase extraction tubes (Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA) were
used for solid phase extraction. The tubes were initially washed with
3 mL of methanol, followed by 6 mL of phosphate buffer. The entire
urine sample was applied to the column and washed with 6 mL of phosphate
buffer, followed by 6 mL of 5% methanol. The samples were eluted with
6 mL of methanol, dried, and resolubilized with ethanol. Samples were
then pipetted in triplicate onto a 96-well plate, along with gallic
acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in ethanol to create a standard
curve, and an ethanol blank. The Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (2
N, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was diluted to 0.2 N and added to
the plate, and then samples were incubated for 7 min at room temperature.
An equal amount of 7% sodium bicarbonate solution was added to the
reaction, and the plate was incubated for 30 min prior to being analyzed
by a spectrophotometer at 750 nm. Total polyphenols of the urine samples
were calculated from the gallic acid standard curve and were reported
as gallic acid equivalents.
Statistical Analysis
The 45Ca:Ca ratio was
transformed using the natural logarithm to correct for skewedness.
For each rat, a simple linear regression model was fit through all
of the nonintervention periods (baseline and washout data points)
creating a regression line as illustrated in Figure 3A and Figure 3B. During the intervention
period, a predicted value from the regression line for each observation
of each rat was determined using the model described. The predicted
value for each observation was subtracted from the experimental value
measured during the botanical diet period, and the mean of differences
was taken for that botanical diet of that rat. The means from each
dietary intervention were averaged across all rats, and 95% confidence
intervals were calculated. The values were exponentiated and reported
in the original scale as percent improvement in calcium retention
compared with baseline.
Figure 3
Plot of days vs 45Ca:Ca ratio for
(A) a control rat
that did not receive a botanical diet and (B) two botanical diet periods
and washout periods in one rat. Each data point represents a single
24 h urine collection. Different diets are indicated by different
symbols. A regression line was fit through all of the nonintervention
periods, which include baseline and washout data points. During the
botanical diet periods, the residual was determined by finding the
difference between the predicted value from the regression line and
the experimental value.
Plot of days vs 45Ca:Ca ratio for
(A) a control rat
that did not receive a botanical diet and (B) two botanical diet periods
and washout periods in one rat. Each data point represents a single
24 h urine collection. Different diets are indicated by different
symbols. A regression line was fit through all of the nonintervention
periods, which include baseline and washout data points. During the
botanical diet periods, the residual was determined by finding the
difference between the predicted value from the regression line and
the experimental value.The data for food intake, weight change, feeding efficiency
ratio,
body weight, and total polyphenols were normal and were analyzed without
transformation. Means and standard deviations were calculated for
these variables, a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)
was performed, and differences were determined by contrasts between
high and low doses within each extract, and between genisteinaglycon
and glycosylated soy. t tests were performed for
food intake, body weight, weight change, and feeding efficiency ratio
to determine differences between control and botanical diets with
a Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons of means.For each rat, NTx values were transformed to correct for skewedness
using the natural logarithm. Subsequently, the difference in NTx between
intervention and washout was determined for each botanical diet as
change in NTx. The means and 95% confidence intervals of the differences
were taken for each diet. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed
followed by contrasts to determine differences between high and low
doses of each diet, and between genisteinaglycon and glycosylated
soy. The means for each diet were transformed back to the original
scale and reported as a ratio with 95% confidence interval. SAS software
(version 9.3 SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.
Results
Bone Calcium Retention
Percent change in bone calcium
retention was determined by finding the difference between the 45Ca:Ca ratio excreted during the botanical diet compared with
the residual line of all control diet periods. The urinary 45Ca:Ca ratio of the control rats in arm 3 (Figure 1) verified that the regression line was not altered by diets
in similarly aging rats (Figure 3A). The ratio
of percent dose of 45Ca to milligrams of Ca in the 24 h
urine samples and residuals for two diets for one rat in arm 1 is
shown in Figure 3B. Using this method, bone
calcium retention was significantly improved due to dietary intervention
with glycosylated soy (13%; p = 0.0166), genisteinaglycon (22%; p = 0.0003), resveratrol-high (14%; p = 0.0012), and plum-high (20%; p = 0.0153)
compared with baseline (Figures 4A and 4B). The genisteinaglycon supplement, Fosteum, increased
bone calcium retention 2-fold compared to glycosidic mixed isoflavone
supplement, Novasoy (p < 0.05). The high dose
of plum (0.45%) and resveratrol (0.2%) improved bone calcium retention
compared with the lower doses (p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Effect of dietary
botanicals on bone calcium retention in ovariectomized
(OVX) rats (n = 16 rats per diet) was reported as
mean ± 95% confidence intervals for (A) arm 1 and (B) arm 2.
A value of “0” represents no change from the regression
line computed from nonintervention periods. A confidence interval
that excludes “0” indicates a significant change from
the regression line at α = 0.05. The * indicates significant
difference (p < 0.05) between high and corresponding
low dose of the same dietary botanical as determined by a t test. For soy, the * indicates significant difference
(p < 0.05) between genistein aglycon and glycosylated
soy.
Effect of dietary
botanicals on bone calcium retention in ovariectomized
(OVX) rats (n = 16 rats per diet) was reported as
mean ± 95% confidence intervals for (A) arm 1 and (B) arm 2.
A value of “0” represents no change from the regression
line computed from nonintervention periods. A confidence interval
that excludes “0” indicates a significant change from
the regression line at α = 0.05. The * indicates significant
difference (p < 0.05) between high and corresponding
low dose of the same dietary botanical as determined by a t test. For soy, the * indicates significant difference
(p < 0.05) between genisteinaglycon and glycosylated
soy.
Food Intake and Body Weight
There was no significant
difference in body weight between high and low doses of any botanical
diet intervention despite some differences in the contributing factors
(Table 3). In arm 1, plum-low increased the
food intake, feeding efficiency ratio, and weight change compared
with the plum-high diet (p < 0.0001). Blueberry-low
increased the feeding efficiency ratio and weight change compared
with the blueberry-high diet (p = 0.05). In arm 2,
grape-low and resveratrol-high decreased the feeding efficiency ratio
compared with control (p < 0.05), and glycosylated
soy, grape-low, and resveratrol-high diets decreased the weight change
of rats compared to those on the control diet (p <
0.05). There was a weak, but significant, positive correlation between
change in body weight and net bone calcium retention (r = 0.21; p = 0.002); however, change in body weight
was not correlated with NTx (p = 0.69).
Table 3
Food Intake, Body Weight, Weight Change,
and Feeding Efficiency Ratioa for Ovariectomized
Rats Expressed As Mean ± Standard Deviation
variable
feeding efficiency ratio
food intake, g/day
body wt, g
wt change, g/day
arm 1 rats
blueberry-low
0.07 ± 0.05*
15.7 ± 1.3
354.2 ± 26.1
1.06 ± 0.70*
blueberry-high
0.03 ± 0.03
14.9 ± 1.44
351.4 ± 29.2
0.45 ± 0.56
plum-low
0.06 ± 0.05**
15.3 ± 2.2**
352.9 ± 22.1
0.92 ± 0.83**
plum-high
–0.02 ± 0.07
12.7 ± 2.3
346.1 ± 21.6
–0.20 ± 0.80
grape seed extract-low
0.03 ± 0.04
14.5 ± 1.0
351.1 ± 24.2
0.48 ± 0.64
grape seed extract-high
0.05 ± 0.03
15.1 ± 1.3
352.7 ± 25.0
0.78 ± 0.57
arm 2 rats
glycosylated soy
0.03 ± 0.03
14.9 ± 1.1
377.0 ± 24.7
0.50 ± 0.40†
genstein aglycon
0.05 ± 0.04
15.0 ± 1.5
376.1 ± 28.2
0.74 ± 0.57
grape-low
0.06 ± 0.02†
16.0 ± 1.5
362.4 ± 22.5
1.01 ± 0.43†
grape-high
0.07 ± 0.03
17.0 ± 1.5
363.6 ± 20.3
1.14 ± 0.63
resveratrol-low
0.05 ± 0.03†
15.2 ± 1.5
360.1 ± 22.2
0.83 ± 0.60†
resveratrol-high
0.07 ± 0.03
15.2 ± 1.5
362.6 ± 22.0
1.05 ± 0.48
arm 3 control rats
0.16 ± 0.06
15.2 ± 1.2
370.2 ± 20.1
2.78 ± 1.24
Feeding efficiency
ratio as change
in body weight/food intake. The * and ** denote significant differences
with p = 0.05 and p < 0.0001,
respectively, between low and corresponding high groups of the same
extract diet as determined by contrasts after ANOVA. The †
denotes significant difference from control with p < 0.05 as determined by t tests performed using
a Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons.
Feeding efficiency
ratio as change
in body weight/food intake. The * and ** denote significant differences
with p = 0.05 and p < 0.0001,
respectively, between low and corresponding high groups of the same
extract diet as determined by contrasts after ANOVA. The †
denotes significant difference from control with p < 0.05 as determined by t tests performed using
a Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons.
Analysis of Extracts
Analysis of
key phenolic compounds
in grape, blueberry, and plum extracts highlighted some compositional
differences between the different extracts (Table 4). The most prominent constituents in the plum extract were
chlorogenic acids (11.62 mg/g extract 3-0-caffeoylquinic and 21.75
mg/g extract other forms of caffeoylquinic), which were also notably
higher than the content found in grape (3.28 mg/g extract chlorogenic
acids) and blueberry (5.04 mg/g extract total chlorogenic acids).
Grape and blueberry were both characterized as being higher in anthocyanins
(54.7 mg/g extract and 44.41 mg/g extract total anthocyanins, respectively)
compared with plum (0.5 mg/g extract total anthocyanins); however,
grape had a greater amount of gallic acid compared with blueberry
(11.85 mg/g extract compared with 0.45 mg/g extract, respectively),
and blueberry contained a higher level of chlorogenic acids than grape
(5.04 mg/g extract compared with 3.28 mg/g extract, respectively).
Grape extract did not contain resveratrol, but did have other stilbene
derivatives (9.16 mg/g extract).
Table 4
Key Phenolic Compounds
Identified
in Extractsa
mg/g extractb
analytes
plum
grape
blueberry
phenolic acids
gallic
0.15
11.85
0.45
ferulic
3.16
2.22
caffeic
2.82
0.37
0.45
stilbenoids
resveratrol
other stilbene derivatives
9.16
2.10
chlorogenic acids
3-0-caffeoylquinic
11.62
4.19
caffeoylquinic
(other
forms)
21.75
3.28
1.85
flavonoids
catechin
2.84
1.25
epicatechin
0.81
quercetin- glucosides
0.09
0.14
0.23
genistein
daidzein
cyanidin-glycosides
0.94
1.85
acetylated cyanidins
0.27
0.71
0.19
peonidin-glycosides
3.21
1.21
acetylated peonidins
1.78
delphinidin-glycosides
5.51
9.77
acetylated delphinidins
0.23
2.12
2.60
petunidin-glycosides
7.66
7.10
acetylated petunidins
2.61
malvidin-glycosides
22.44
21.69
acetylated malvidins
7.72
total polyphenolsc
22.2
328
16.5
Phenolic compounds were tested in
duplicate using LC–MS[41] to assay
for key compounds.
Resveratrol
contained 295.12 mg
resveratrol/g sample and grape seed extract contained 827 mg/g total
polyphenols as determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu[38] method. Grape seed extract was unavailable for
analysis using LC–MS.
Total polyphenols were determined
through the Folin–Ciocalteu method.[38]
Phenolic compounds were tested in
duplicate using LC–MS[41] to assay
for key compounds.Resveratrol
contained 295.12 mg
resveratrol/g sample and grape seed extract contained 827 mg/g total
polyphenols as determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu[38] method. Grape seed extract was unavailable for
analysis using LC–MS.Total polyphenols were determined
through the Folin–Ciocalteu method.[38]Grape seed extract-high
(p = 0.0056) and grape-high (p =
0.004) dietary interventions reduced NTx compared with each corresponding
baseline period (Figure 5A and Figure 5B). Resveratrol-low significantly increased NTx
compared with the corresponding baseline period (p = 0.0039). Blueberry, plum, soy, grape seed extract, grape-low,
and resveratrol-high diets did not produce a significant change in
NTx.
Figure 5
Effect of dietary botanicals on urinary NTx in ovariectomized (OVX)
rats was reported as mean ± 95% confidence interval. A value
of “1” represents no change from the regression line
computed from nonintervention periods. A confidence interval that
excludes “1” indicates a significant change from the
regression line at α = 0.05. Contrasts were performed after
ANOVA. For blueberry (n = 15 for low; n = 16 for high), plum (n = 15 for low; n = 14 for high), and grape seed extract (n = 14
for low; n = 15 for high) diets (A) * indicates a
significant (p < 0.05) difference between NTx
values during the low and corresponding high doses of the same diet.
For soy (n = 14 for genistein aglycon; n = 15 for glycosylated soy), grape extract (n =
16 for low and high), and resveratrol (n = 16 for
low and high) (B) there was a trend for NTx to be lower during the
grape-high diet compared with the grape-low diet (p = 0.078). NTx, urinary collagen type 1 cross-linked N-telopeptide.
Effect of dietary botanicals on urinary NTx in ovariectomized (OVX)
rats was reported as mean ± 95% confidence interval. A value
of “1” represents no change from the regression line
computed from nonintervention periods. A confidence interval that
excludes “1” indicates a significant change from the
regression line at α = 0.05. Contrasts were performed after
ANOVA. For blueberry (n = 15 for low; n = 16 for high), plum (n = 15 for low; n = 14 for high), and grape seed extract (n = 14
for low; n = 15 for high) diets (A) * indicates a
significant (p < 0.05) difference between NTx
values during the low and corresponding high doses of the same diet.
For soy (n = 14 for genisteinaglycon; n = 15 for glycosylated soy), grape extract (n =
16 for low and high), and resveratrol (n = 16 for
low and high) (B) there was a trend for NTx to be lower during the
grape-high diet compared with the grape-low diet (p = 0.078). NTx, urinary collagen type 1 cross-linked N-telopeptide.The aglycon soy diet significantly
increased serum bone alkaline
phosphatase compared with baseline (p = 0.03, data
not shown); however, none of the other diets impacted bone alkaline
phosphatase.
Urine Total Polyphenols
There was
a significant dose
response of urinary total polyphenols in blueberry (p = 0.005) and grape seed extract (p < 0.0001)
interventions of arm 1 and grape (p = 0.0002) dietary
intervention of arm 2 rats (Figure 6A and Figure 6B). There was no difference in total polyphenols
between glycosylated soy and genisteinaglycon (p = 0.27).
Figure 6
Effect of dietary botanicals on urinary total polyphenols in 24
h urine of ovariectomized (OVX) rats (n = 16 rats
per diet). Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation with
contrasts performed to detect differences between means. For blueberry,
plum, and grape seed extract diets (A) * and ** indicate low is significantly
different from high at p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001, respectively. All arm 1 diets were significantly different
from baseline at p = 0.0015. For soy, grape, and
resveratrol diets (B) * indicates that low is significantly different
from high at p = 0.0002. There was a trend for total
polyphenols during low to be different from high during the resveratrol-high
diet with p = 0.06. All arm 2 diets were significantly
different from baseline at p < 0.0001.
Effect of dietary botanicals on urinary total polyphenols in 24
h urine of ovariectomized (OVX) rats (n = 16 rats
per diet). Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation with
contrasts performed to detect differences between means. For blueberry,
plum, and grape seed extract diets (A) * and ** indicate low is significantly
different from high at p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001, respectively. All arm 1 diets were significantly different
from baseline at p = 0.0015. For soy, grape, and
resveratrol diets (B) * indicates that low is significantly different
from high at p = 0.0002. There was a trend for total
polyphenols during low to be different from high during the resveratrol-high
diet with p = 0.06. All arm 2 diets were significantly
different from baseline at p < 0.0001.
Discussion
In this crossover intervention
trial in OVX rats, we identified
that although both isoflavone-containing diets were effective at increasing
bone calcium retention, the aglycon form of genistein was significantly
more effective than the glucoside. In addition, we demonstrated that
higher levels of resveratrol and plum (0.20% and 0.45% total polyphenols,
respectively) increased bone calcium retention.Dietary aglycon
soy elicited an improvement to bone calcium retention
that was approximately double the response from a diet with glycosylated
soy (22% for aglycon soy compared with 13% for glycosylated soy),
which supported our hypothesis that the aglycon form of genistein
is more effective than the glucoside when tested on an equivalent
mass basis of total polyphenols. We did not observe a difference in
urinary total polyphenols between genisteinaglycon and glycosylated
soy, which supports that the glycosylated soy and genisteinaglycon
diets were formulated to have equivalent isoflavone content. We are
first to directly compare soy aglycon to glucoside for effect on bone
in an estrogen-depleted rodent model. Through this direct comparison,
we were able to demonstrate that the aglycon form of genistein was
more effective than glycosylated soy in increasing bone calcium retention.Cleavage of the sugar moiety is believed to be required for genistin
(glycosylated) to be effectively absorbed in the intestine,[9] but absorption of genistein (aglycon) occurs
readily[11] and as early in the digestive
process as in the stomach.[43] After the
glucoside is hydrolyzed and absorbed in the gut, it is conjugated
to mostly glucuronic acid by both intestinal and hepatic enzymes.
Consumption of the aglycon form of genistein has the potential to
lead to a higher presence of unconjugated genistein in the blood due
to enhanced uptake in the gut and some absorption in the stomach.
This is biologically important because unconjugated genistein has
been shown to bind more strongly to estrogen receptor-β than
its glucuronide metabolites,[16] demonstrating
the potential for a more estrogenic effect on bone. We were able to
demonstrate the enhanced efficacy of the aglycon form of genistein
on bone in an estrogen-depleted rodent model. Future research should
directly compare the metabolites produced from consumption of aglycon
and glycoside soy to more closely link this mechanism to the increase
in bone calcium retention from the aglycon form of soy.Estrogen
in bone works primarily by decreasing the production of
inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and RANKL and M-CSF
(macrophage colony stimulating factor)) in osteoblasts and precursor
cells to regulate osteoclast activity.[44,45] A drop in
estrogen leads to a prominent increase in osteoclast activity, which
greatly increases bone resorption with a lag in subsequent bone formation.[18] Although the estrogenic activity of phytoestrogens
such as isoflavones has been shown to elicit an antiresorptive response
on bone,[24] we observed that genisteinaglycon
increased bone calcium retention, consistent with bone formation.
This is evidenced by an increase in BAP, which is a marker of bone
turnover and often an indicator of an anabolic effect to bone. Our
finding suggests that the ability of isoflavones to reduce net bone
loss works by stimulating the anabolic bone building effect to counter
the increase in resorption caused by loss of estrogen, rather than
by mitigating bone resorption only. Urinary calcium tracer excretion
is specific to bone mineral balance and more precise than biochemical
markers of bone turnover.Our finding that short-term supplementation
of dried plum at 20%
w/w diet, delivering 0.45% w/w total dietary polyphenols (plum-high),
to OVX rats resulted in a 20% increase in bone calcium retention was
similar to the 15% increase in bone tracer retention observed by Mühlbauer
et al. using a similar method in OVX rats with a lower percentage
(8% w/w diet) of dried prune extract for 10 days.[19] The effects we observed on bone calcium retention from
plum is also consistent with doses reported in the literature to be
protective to bone in OVX rats, i.e., 15% and 25%.[3−5,46,47] In postmenopausal women,
plum supplemented at 100 g/d prevented bone loss and increased BMD;[23,47] the control diet of 100 g/d dried apples also protected bone from
loss, but to a lesser degree than dried plum supplementation.[23] This level of dried plum intake would be equivalent
to the 25% w/w diet given to rodents and similar to the 20% w/w diet
given in this study, assuming that food intake in women totals approximately
400 g/d on a dry weight basis.We did not find a significant
effect on bone with diets of blueberry,
grape seed extract, or grape extract in OVX rats. Evaluation of the
phenolic profiles of these extracts reveals that chlorogenic acids
are more prominent in plum compared to the other extracts. Both chlorogenic
acid[48] and dried plum powder[49] have been found to have an inhibitory effect
on the RANKL pathway involved in osteoclastogenesis. However, we did
not observe a decrease in NTx, a marker of bone resorption, with dietary
supplementation with dried plum.Previous work demonstrated
that blueberry at 5% w/w diet prevented
the loss of whole-body BMD in OVX rats.[50] Additionally, blueberry at 10% w/w diet fed to prepubertal[6,51] rats prevented bone loss later in life; the suggested mechanism
was that phenolic acids found in blueberry promoted osteoblast differentiation.
Although sera phenolic acid derivatives were described,[6] the phenolic profile of the blueberry extract
was not reported. The lack of effect observed in our study could potentially
be attributed to differences in blueberry phenolic profile and concentration
of phenolic compounds in the extract. While abundant in anthocyanins,
blueberry had lower levels of chlorogenic acids compared with the
plum powder, which may have impacted the efficacy of the blueberry
diet.Grape seed extract when given with calcium was shown to
have a
protective effect on bone in adult and growing intact rats when given
immediately following a low calcium diet.[2,22] We
tested grape seed extract in an estrogen-depleted rodent model and
did not find an effect on bone. Catechins, the most abundant polyphenols
present in grape seed extract,[52] have been
shown to have estrogenic activity,[53,54] and there
is evidence to suggest that catechins from green tea have a role in
preventing postmenopausal bone loss.[55,56] however, the
binding affinity of different catechins to estrogen receptor-β
should be investigated further as this receptor more directly impacts
bone.We did not see an effect of grape extract (0.2–1%
w/w total
polyphenols in diet) on bone calcium retention; however, we did find
that resveratrol-high, which delivered 0.2% dry matter as total polyphenols
in the diet, increased bone calcium retention by 14%. Mühlbauer
et al.[19] fed rats 8% w/w diet red wine
residue and observed a reduction in bone resorption; however, the
measured total polyphenols and resveratrol content were not reported.
Despite anthocyanins and gallic acid being more prominent in grape
than the other extracts, our analysis of the phenolic profile of grape
extract showed an absence of resveratrol, a compound which has been
proven to have estrogenic activity[17] and
was effective as an isolated compound in our study. Further analysis
comparing grape extracts with varying levels of resveratrol should
be tested to determine if efficacy is due primarily to resveratrol.Total polyphenols were significantly higher during the botanical
interventions than during baseline and washout periods, suggesting
that polyphenols were absorbed and cleared into urine from test diets.
Total polyphenols were not significantly different during the washout
compared with baseline, which suggests clearance of prior diet in
the system and no carryover effect.Biochemical markers of bone
turnover were not always consistent
with bone calcium retention response to diets. Grape seed extract-high
and grape-high supplementation decreased NTx without a change in bone
calcium retention. Resveratrol-low induced an increase in NTx, but
had no significant effect on bone calcium retention. The increase
in bone calcium retention for glycosylated soy, aglycon soy, plum-high,
and resveratrol-high failed to lower NTx or increase bone alkaline
phosphatase.In our crossover study with OVX rats, dietary plum,
resveratrol,
genistein glucoside, and genisteinaglycon increased bone calcium
retention by 13–22%. To our knowledge we are the first to directly
compare and report the enhanced effect of genisteinaglycon on bone.
Additionally, we confirmed efficacy of dried plum on bone and highlighted
chlorogenic acids as the group of phenolic compounds contributing
to increased bone calcium retention. Although we did not observe a
bone protective effect with a resveratrol-devoid grape extract, we
did observe a strong bone protective effect with resveratrol, which
suggests that resveratrol may be the active component in other grape
products that have been shown to have bone protective effects. Future
studies could extend this work by evaluating the effect of specific
classes of botanical polyphenolics on bone strength measures.
Authors: M Franklin; S Y Bu; M R Lerner; E A Lancaster; D Bellmer; D Marlow; S A Lightfoot; B H Arjmandi; D J Brackett; E A Lucas; B J Smith Journal: Bone Date: 2006-08-04 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Bernard P Halloran; Thomas J Wronski; Douglas C VonHerzen; Vivian Chu; Xuechun Xia; Jennifer E Pingel; Alyssa A Williams; Brenda J Smith Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jian Zhang; Oxana P Lazarenko; Michael L Blackburn; Kartik Shankar; Thomas M Badger; Martin J J Ronis; Jin-Ran Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mary Jane De Souza; Nicole C A Strock; Connie J Rogers; Nancy I Williams; Mario G Ferruzzi; Cindy H Nakatsu; Abigayle M R Simpson; Connie Weaver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2022-05-28
Authors: Janhavi J Damani; Mary Jane De Souza; Hannah L VanEvery; Nicole C A Strock; Connie J Rogers Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2022-10-02 Impact factor: 11.567
Authors: Dennis P Cladis; Abigayle M R Simpson; Kaitlyn J Cooper; Cindy H Nakatsu; Mario G Ferruzzi; Connie M Weaver Journal: Food Funct Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Gretel G Pellegrini; Cynthya C Morales; Taylor C Wallace; Lilian I Plotkin; Teresita Bellido Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Bahram H Arjmandi; Sarah A Johnson; Shirin Pourafshar; Negin Navaei; Kelli S George; Shirin Hooshmand; Sheau C Chai; Neda S Akhavan Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-05-14 Impact factor: 5.717