Literature DB >> 24894429

Visual feedback-related changes in ipsilateral cortical excitability during unimanual movement: Implications for mirror therapy.

Paola Reissig1, Michael I Garry, Jeffery J Summers, Mark R Hinder.   

Abstract

Provision of a mirror image of a hand undertaking a motor task (i.e., mirror therapy) elicits behavioural improvements in the inactive hand. A greater understanding of the neural mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon is required to maximise its potential for rehabilitation across the lifespan, e.g., following hemiparesis or unilateral weakness. Young and older participants performed unilateral finger abductions with no visual feedback, with feedback of the active or passive hands, or with a mirror image of the active hand. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess feedback-related changes in two neurophysiological measures thought to be involved in inter-manual transfer of skill, namely corticospinal excitability (CSE) and intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the passive hemisphere. Task performance led to CSE increases, accompanied by decreases of SICI, in all visual feedback conditions relative to rest. However, the changes due to mirror feedback were not significantly different to those observed in the other (more standard) visual conditions. Accordingly, the unimanual motor action itself, rather than modifications in visual feedback, appears more instrumental in driving changes in CSE and SICI. Therefore, changes in CSE and SICI are unlikely to underpin the behavioural benefits of mirror therapy. We discuss implications for rehabilitation and directions of future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Ipsilateral cortical excitability; Mirror therapy; Rehabilitation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24894429     DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2014.922889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil        ISSN: 0960-2011            Impact factor:   2.868


  9 in total

1.  Unilateral movement preparation causes task-specific modulation of TMS responses in the passive, opposite limb.

Authors:  Lilian Chye; Stephan Riek; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Mirror illusion reduces motor cortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during forceful unilateral muscle contractions.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Stuart Goodall; Kevin Thomas; Tibor Hortobágyi; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The Influence of Mirror-Visual Feedback on Training-Induced Motor Performance Gains in the Untrained Hand.

Authors:  Paola Reissig; Rohan Puri; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers; Mark R Hinder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Network interactions underlying mirror feedback in stroke: A dynamic causal modeling study.

Authors:  Soha Saleh; Mathew Yarossi; Thushini Manuweera; Sergei Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  The Cross-Education Phenomenon: Brain and Beyond.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Séverine Lamon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability.

Authors:  Mathew Yarossi; Thushini Manuweera; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Comparison of the on-line effects of different motor simulation conditions on corticospinal excitability in healthy participants.

Authors:  C Pfenninger; S Grosprêtre; A Remontet; T Lapole
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Sergiu Albu; Raul Pelayo; John Rothwell; Eloy Opisso; Daniel Leon; Dolor Soler; Josep Maria Tormos
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Age-Specific Effects of Mirror-Muscle Activity on Cross-Limb Adaptations Under Mirror and Non-Mirror Visual Feedback Conditions.

Authors:  Paola Reissig; Tino Stöckel; Michael I Garry; Jeffery J Summers; Mark R Hinder
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.