| Literature DB >> 24892001 |
Hiroko Kawashima1, Masafumi Inokuchi2, Hiroyuki Furukawa2, Hiroko Ikeda3, Seiko Kitamura3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of breast cancer according to intrinsic subtypes and to investigate whether the MRI and immunohistochemical findings were related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) effects.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Intrinsic subtype; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Year: 2014 PMID: 24892001 PMCID: PMC4039660 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Substitutional definition of intrinsic subtype
| Intrinsic subtype | ER | PgR | HER2 | Ki-67 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luminal A | + | +/- | - | <14% |
| Luminal B | + | +/- | - | ≧14% |
| Luminal-HER2 | + | +/- | + | any |
| HER2 | - | - | + | any |
| Triple-negative | - | - | - | any |
ER estrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
MRI features according to each intrinsic subtype
| LA | n-LA | LB | n-LB | LH2 | n-LH2 | H2 | n-H2 | TN | n-TN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI findings | (n = 24) | (n = 92) | (n = 15) | (n = 101) | (n = 14) | (n = 102) | (n = 23) | (n = 93) | (n = 40) | (n = 76) |
| Mass margin | ||||||||||
| Smooth | 7(29) | 52(57) | 7(47) | 52(51) | 6(43) | 53(52) | 15(65)b | 44(47) | 24(60) | 35(46) |
| Irregular | 17(71)a | 40(43) | 8(53) | 49(49) | 8(57) | 49(48) | 8(35) | 49(53) | 16(40) | 41(54) |
| aP = .005 | bP = .032 | |||||||||
| Intratumoral necrosis | ||||||||||
| Presence | 4(17) | 17(18) | 3(20) | 18(18) | 0(0) | 21(21) | 2(9) | 19(20) | 12(30)c | 9(12) |
| Absence | 20(83) | 75(82) | 12(80) | 83(82) | 14(100) | 81(79) | 21(91) | 74(80) | 28(70) | 67(88) |
| cP = .019 | ||||||||||
| Tumor extension around mass | ||||||||||
| Presence | 17(71) | 69(75) | 7(47) | 79(78) | 10(71) | 76(75) | 21(91)e | 65(70) | 31(78) | 55(72) |
| Absence | 7(29) | 23(25) | 8(53)d | 22(22) | 4(29) | 26(25) | 2(9) | 28(30) | 9(22) | 21(28) |
| dP = .0047 | eP = .009 | |||||||||
| Kinetic curve pattern | ||||||||||
| Washout | 5(21) | 37(40) | 8(53) | 34(34) | 5(36) | 37(36) | 14(61) | 28(30) | 10(25) | 32(42) |
| Plateau | 14(58) | 44(48) | 6(40) | 52(51) | 8(57) | 50(49) | 6(26) | 52(56) | 24(60) | 34(45) |
| Persistent | 5(21) | 11(12) | 1(7) | 15(15) | 1(7) | 15(15) | 3(13) | 13(14) | 6(15) | 10(13) |
LA luminal A, n-LA non-luminal A, LB luminal B, n-LB non-luminal B, LH2 luminal-HER2, n-LH2 non-luminal-HER2, H2 HER2, n-H2 non-HER2, TN triple-negative, n-TN non-triple-negative.
a,b,c,d,eIndicates statistical significance (P < .05).
Figure 1Luminal A breast cancer of right breast in 40-year-old woman. Prior to NAC, dynamic MR images obtained at 60 s (a), 240 s (b), and 300 s (c) after administration of gadolinium show a persistent enhancing mass with an irregular border. After the completion of NAC, residual tumor still shows an enhancement on dynamic MR image obtained at 60 s (d).
Figure 2HER2 breast cancer of left breast in 71-year-old woman. Prior to NAC, dynamic MR images obtained at 60 s (a), 240 s (b), and 300 s (c) after administration of gadolinium show a strong and washout enhancing mass with a smooth border. Tumor extension around the mass is shown in Figure 2b. After the completion of NAC, there is no longer recognizable tumor on dynamic MR image obtained at 300 s (d).
Figure 3Triple-negative breast cancer of left breast in 69-year-old woman. Prior to NAC, fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image shows a mass with an area of very high intratumoral intensity (a) and dynamic MR image obtained at 60 s after administration of gadolinium shows a peripherally-enhancing mass with a large area of intratumoral necrosis (b). After the completion of NAC, very high intratumoral intensity enlarges on fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image (c) and there is an increase in tumor size on dynamic MR image obtained at 60 s (d).
Figure 4Relative signal enhancement (RSE) at 2 min according to each intrinsic subtype. Luminal B cancers showed significantly higher RSE than luminal A cancers (P < 0.01), and HER2 cancers also showed significantly higher RSE than luminal A cancers (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Relative signal enhancement (RSE) at 6 min according to each intrinsic subtype. RSE at 6 min was not significant different between each intrinsic subtype.
Figure 6Pathological response following NAC according to each intrinsic subtype.
Relationship between NAC effects with the MRI and immunohistochemical findings by multiple regression analysis
| P value | β | stdβ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ER | .0244 | -0.6213 | -0.2017 |
| PgR | NS | ||
| HER2 | .0222 | 0.6885 | 0.2091 |
| Ki-67 | NS | ||
| Mass margin | NS | ||
| Intratumoral necrosis | .0157 | -0.8826 | -0.2214 |
| Tumor extension around mass | NS | ||
| Kinetic curve pattern | NS | ||
| RSE 2 min | NS | ||
| RSE 6 min | NS |
NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, β partial regression coefficient, stdβ standard partial regression coefficient, ER estrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, RSE relative signal enhancement.