Literature DB >> 24891770

Study of two techniques for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure.

Vipul Gurjar1, B M Halvadia1, R P Bharaney1, Vicky Ajwani1, S M Shah1, Samir Rai1, Mitesh Trivedi1.   

Abstract

To study the results of two techniques, simple interrupted closure and continuous with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure. A random selection of 200 midline laparotomy cases was done. In one group (group A) of 100 cases, midline fascial wound closure was done with continuous sutures with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique using Prolene No. 1 suture material. In the other group (group B) of 100 cases, closure was done with the technique of simple interrupted sutures with Prolene No.1 suture material. Comparison of both the techniques regarding preoperative status and postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, suture sinus formation, stitch granuloma, and chronic wound pain was done according to clinical examination and recorded in the pro forma prepared. In group A, postoperative complications were incisional hernia 3 %, wound dehiscence 4 %, and suture sinus formation 1 %. In group B, postoperative complication were incisional hernia 5 %, wound dehiscence 4 %, and suture sinus formation 1 %. All these complications were statistically insignificant, in both group comparisons. While the complication such as stitch granuloma 3 %, chronic wound pain 3 %, and wound infection 4 % in group A was significantly less than in group B where the complication of stitch granuloma was 12 %, chronic wound pain 13 %, and wound infection 13 % (P value 0.03, P value 0.018, and P value 0.048, respectively). Both the techniques, simple interrupted suture closure and continuous with intermittent Aberdeen knot closure for midline laparotomy fascial wounds, show a similar rate of postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and suture sinus formation. But the continuous suturing with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique is a better option to prevent complications such as stitch granuloma, chronic wound pain, and wound infection, which are higher in the simple interrupted fascial wound closure technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fascial wound closure; Midline laparotomy; Suturing technique

Year:  2012        PMID: 24891770      PMCID: PMC4039690          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-012-0612-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  5 in total

Review 1.  Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; C A Courtney
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.392

2.  The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N C Hodgson; R A Malthaner; T Ostbye
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Wissing; T J van Vroonhoven; M E Schattenkerk; H F Veen; R J Ponsen; J Jeekel
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Foreign material in postoperative adhesions.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; D C de Lange; C C Wauters; W C Hop; J J Duron; J L Pailler; B R Camprodon; L Holmdahl; H J van Geldorp; J Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Wound dehiscence: is still a problem in the 21th century: a retrospective study.

Authors:  John Spiliotis; Konstantinos Tsiveriotis; Anastasios D Datsis; Archodoula Vaxevanidou; Georgios Zacharis; Konstantinos Giafis; Spyros Kekelos; Athanasios Rogdakis
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 5.469

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Exclusion Criteria: Relegation Belies Wisdom.

Authors:  Debajyoti Mohanty; Ashwani Kumar Dalal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 2.  Meta-analysis on Materials and Techniques for Laparotomy Closure: The MATCH Review.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; E B Deerenberg; L Venclauskas; R H Fortelny; M Miserez; F E Muysoms
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.