Literature DB >> 8604903

Foreign material in postoperative adhesions.

R W Luijendijk1, D C de Lange, C C Wauters, W C Hop, J J Duron, J L Pailler, B R Camprodon, L Holmdahl, H J van Geldorp, J Jeekel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined the prevalence of foreign body granulomas in intra-abdominal adhesions in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational study, adult patients with a history of one or more previous abdominal operations and scheduled for laparotomy between 1991 and 1993 were examined during surgery. Patients in whom adhesions were present were selected for study. Quantity, distribution, and quality of adhesions were scored, and adhesion samples were taken for histologic examination.
RESULTS: In 448 studied patients, the adhesions were most frequently attached to the omentum (68%) and the small bowel (67%). The amount of adhesions was significantly smaller in patients with a history of only one minor operation or one major operation, compared with those with multiple laparotomies (p < 0.001). Significantly more adhesions were found in patients with a history of adhesions at previous laparotomy (p < 0.001), with presence of abdominal abscess, hematoma, and intestinal leakage as complications after former surgery (p = 0.01, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), and with a history of an unoperated inflammatory process (p = 0.04). Granulomas were found in 26% of all patients. Suture granulomas were found in 25% of the patients. Starch granulomas were present in 5% of the operated patients whose surgeons wore starch-containing gloves. When suture granulomas were present, the median interval between the present and the most recent previous laparotomy was 13 months. When suture granulomas were absent, this interval was significantly longer--i.e., 30 months (p = 0.002). The percentage of patients with suture granulomas decreased gradually from 37% if the previous laparotomy had occurred up to 6 months before the present operation, to 18% if the previous laparotomy had occurred more than 2 years ago (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The number of adhesions found at laparotomy was significantly larger in patients with a history of multiple laparotomies, unoperated intra-abdominal inflammatory disease, and previous postoperative intra-abdominal complications, and when adhesions were already present at previous laparotomy. In recent adhesions, suture granulomas occurred in a large percentage. This suggests that the intra-abdominal presence of foreign material is an important cause of adhesion formation. Therefore intra-abdominal contamination with foreign material should be minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604903      PMCID: PMC1235111          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  28 in total

1.  STARCH GRANULOMA: A PRESENT-DAY SURGICAL HAZARD.

Authors:  G H MCNAUGHT
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. An experimental study.

Authors:  H ELLIS
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  The hazards of surgical glove dusting powders.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-12

Review 4.  Peritoneal adhesions. Incidence, cause, and prevention.

Authors:  D Menzies
Journal:  Surg Annu       Date:  1992

Review 5.  Adhesiolysis.

Authors:  A Hershlag; M P Diamond; A H DeCherney
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Current spectrum of intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  G McEntee; D Pender; D Mulvin; M McCullough; S Naeeder; S Farah; M S Badurdeen; V Ferraro; C Cham; N Gillham
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study.

Authors:  M A Weibel; G Majno
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Do surgical packs cause peritoneal adhesions?

Authors:  R H Down; R Whitehead; J M Watts
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1979-06

9.  Simple and effective method of removing starch powder from surgical gloves.

Authors:  I Fraser
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-06-19

10.  Intraabdominal granuloma reaction in rats after introduction of maize-starch powder.

Authors:  K Nordstrand; O Melhus; T J Eide; T Larsen; K E Giercksky
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A       Date:  1987-03
View more
  64 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the development of experimentally induced post surgical adhesions: a microstereological study.

Authors:  S A Ricketts; P D Sibbons; C J Green
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Wietske W Vrijland; Larissa N L Tseng; Heert J M Eijkman; Wim C J Hop; Jack J Jakimowicz; Piet Leguit; Laurents P S Stassen; Dingeman J Swank; Robert Haverlag; H Jaap Bonjer; Hans Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The influence of intraoperative complications on adhesion formation during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in an animal model.

Authors:  E M Gamal; P Metzger; G Szabó; E Bráth; K Petõ; A Oláh; J Kiss; I Furka; I Mikó
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  L Melman; E D Jenkins; N A Hamilton; L C Bender; M D Brodt; C R Deeken; S C Greco; M M Frisella; B D Matthews
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; G T Rodeheaver; D L Moody; P A Foresman; B J Ramshaw
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options.

Authors:  Dörthe Brüggmann; Garri Tchartchian; Markus Wallwiener; Karsten Münstedt; Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg; Andreas Hackethal
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Liquid Paraffin vs Hyaluronic Acid in Preventing Intraperitoneal Adhesions.

Authors:  Hanish Kataria; Vinod Prem Singh
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of the Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Small Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Srinivas R Rami Reddy; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.