The outcome for glioblastoma patients remains dismal for its invariably recrudesces within 2 cm of the resection cavity. Local immunotherapy has the potential to eradicate the residual infiltrative component of these tumors. Here, we report the development of a biodegradable hydrogel containing therapeutic T lymphocytes for localized delivery to glioblastoma cells for brain tumor immunotherapy. Thermoreversible poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan hydrogels (PCgels) were optimized for steady T lymphocyte release. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy confirmed the chemical structure of poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan, and rheological studies revealed that the sol-to-gel transition of the PCgel occurred around ≥32 °C. T lymphocyte invasion through the PCgel and subsequent cytotoxicity to glioblastoma were assessed in vitro. The PCgel was shown to be cellular compatible with T lymphocytes, and the T lymphocytes retain their anti-glioblastoma activity after being encapsulated in the PCgel. T lymphocytes in the PCgel were shown to be more effective in killing glioblastoma than those in the Matrigel control. This may be attributed to the optimal pore size of the PCgel allowing better invasion of T lymphocytes. Our study suggests that this unique PCgel depot may offer a viable approach for localized immunotherapy for glioblastoma.
The outcome for glioblastomapatients remains dismal for its invariably recrudesces within 2 cm of the resection cavity. Local immunotherapy has the potential to eradicate the residual infiltrative component of these tumors. Here, we report the development of a biodegradable hydrogel containing therapeutic T lymphocytes for localized delivery to glioblastoma cells for brain tumor immunotherapy. Thermoreversible poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan hydrogels (PCgels) were optimized for steady T lymphocyte release. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy confirmed the chemical structure of poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan, and rheological studies revealed that the sol-to-gel transition of the PCgel occurred around ≥32 °C. T lymphocyte invasion through the PCgel and subsequent cytotoxicity to glioblastoma were assessed in vitro. The PCgel was shown to be cellular compatible with T lymphocytes, and the T lymphocytes retain their anti-glioblastoma activity after being encapsulated in the PCgel. T lymphocytes in the PCgel were shown to be more effective in killing glioblastoma than those in the Matrigel control. This may be attributed to the optimal pore size of the PCgel allowing better invasion of T lymphocytes. Our study suggests that this unique PCgel depot may offer a viable approach for localized immunotherapy for glioblastoma.
Glioblastoma (WHO grade
IV) is the most aggressive and fatal form
of brain tumor.[1,2] Despite the intensive treatment
of current therapies such as surgical resection, followed by radio-
and chemotherapies, glioblastoma remains incurable.[3,4] Glioblastomas
rarely metastasize; instead, almost all types of these tumors recur
locally within centimeters of the original resection cavity. Even
after gross total resection (as confirmed by pathology), glioblastomas
invariably recur within 2 cm of the original lesion because of their
infiltrative nature.[5] This has inspired
the development of various loco-regional treatment approaches such
as Gliadel wafer (biodegradable polyanhydride wafers loaded with the
chemotherapeutic carmustine) that are placed in the resection cavity
and have shown some success as a drug delivery implant for glioblastoma.[6] Unfortunately, the two-month survival benefit
gained with Gliadel wafers provides a very short survival advantage
to glioblastomapatients, and thus, new therapies including better
delivery approaches are urgently needed.Many other approaches
to local tumor treatment have been evaluated,[5−7] including direct
introduction of chemotherapeutic agents by controlled
release polymers placed in the tumor resection cavity,[8,9] direct infusion of toxin conjugates into the tumor,[10] and application of virus-producing cells for suicide gene
therapy.[11,12] Nevertheless, chemotherapies and gene therapies
are limited by tumor resistance and a lack of drug delivery specificity
causing systemic toxicity and other off-target side effects. Immunotherapy
that attempts to stimulate the immune system to specifically reject
and destroy tumors with minimal harm to health tissues can be an alternative
approach to chemotherapies and gene therapies in brain cancer treatment.
Immunotherapy is a rapidly emerging treatment strategy for multiple
malignancies[13] and is especially attractive
for treating glioblastoma, where tumor cells residing beyond the resection
cavity must be selectively targeted without damaging the normal brain
tissue.[14] Adoptive T lymphocyte transfer
involves the activation of patient-derived T lymphocytes toward a
selective tumorcell-surface antigen, which has shown tremendous promise
in preclinical studies.[13,15,16] Anti-glioblastoma adoptive T lymphocyte transfer has been shown
to be safe in numerous clinical trials.[17] The key to the successful immunotherapy of glioblastoma will be
dependent on the persistent existence of T lymphocytes to fully eradicate
individual glioblastoma cells that have invaded regions throughout
the brain. Therefore, developing approaches for locally sustained
delivery of T lymphocytes is highly desirable.Here we report
the development of a biodegradable, thermal reversible
hydrogel containing therapeutic T lymphocytes for localized delivery
to glioblastoma cells for brain tumor immunotherapy. The hydrogel
is made of poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan (PCgel).
Chitosan, a biodegradable, natural polysaccharide derived by the partial
deacetylation of chitin, shares structural similarities with the glycosaminoglycans
(GAGs) present in the native extracellular matrix (ECM). Poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) is a neutral, water-soluble, and nontoxic polymer approved
by the Food and Drug Administration for internal consumption and injection
in a variety of foods, cosmetics, personal care products, pharmaceuticals,
and biomedical applications.[18] The properties
of the PCgel such as viscosity, pore size, and gelation time and temperature
can be tailored by varying the amount of the PEG on chitosan or the
concentration of the hydrogel. The PCgel introduced in our previous
studies is a liquid at low temperatures and forms a gel readily at
body temperature.[19,20] This unique property allows the
gel to incorporate T lymphocytes and introduce them to the site of
action (e.g., the brain tumor site) without the need for surgical
intervention, for localized and sustained release. The PCgel made
in our previous studies was stable in PBS but not in cell culture
media. In this study, we aimed to produce a PCgel that is stable in
cell culture media, has a pore diameter of a few micrometers, and
can provide steady release of viable T lymphocytes while maintaining
the same thermally reversible property. The chemical bonding between
chitosan and PEG and the viscosity of the PCgel were characterized
via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis and rheological measurements,
respectively. The biocompatibility of the PCgel was assessed by a
culture with T lymphocytes. The ability of the PCgel to act as a depot
for sustained release of cytotoxic T lymphocytes was tested using
a transwell invasion assay. The cytotoxic activity of the invasive
T lymphocytes on glioblastoma cells was examined using a live/dead
assay.
Experimental Section
Materials
All
chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise specified. Chitosan (85% deacetylated,
medium molecular weight) and methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG, 2000
Da) were used as received.RPMI Media 1640 (RPMI), antibiotic-antimycotic, Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS), Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were
purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
Preparation of PEG-g-chitosan
On the
basis of our previous studies,[19,20] the poly(ethylene glycol)-g-chitosan (PEG-g-chitosan) was prepared
with a slight modification to decrease the ratio of PEG to chitosan
and thus to increase the hydrophobicity of chitosan and produce a
firmer PEG-g-chitosan gel that would be stable in
cell culture media. Specifically, PEG-aldehyde was prepared by oxidation
of PEG with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetic anhydride.[21] After 20 g of PEG completely dissolved in an
anhydrous chloroform/DMSO mixture [0.125 (v/v)], 10 mL of acetic anhydride
was added to the solution. The mixture was steadily stirred for 16
h at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere. Then the solution
was precipitated with excess diethyl ether. The precipitate was dissolved
with chloroform and then reprecipitated with diethyl ether. After
the sample had been dried under vacuum, white PEG-aldehyde powder
was obtained.PEG-g-chitosan was prepared by
alkylation of chitosan followed by Schiff base formation.[22] The mixture of PEG-aldehyde and chitosan [0.32
(w/w)] were added to a mixture of methanol and 2% acetic acid [0.25
(v/v)]. A 5% cyanoborohydride (NaCNBH3) aqueous solution
was then added dropwise to the mixture of chitosan and PEG-aldehyde
at pH 5.5 [NaCNBH3/PEG-aldehyde, 0.2 (w/w)]. The resultant
mixture was dialyzed with a dialysis membrane (molecular weight cutoff
of 12000–14000) against deionized (DI) water and 0.05 M NaOH,
and then DI water was again added until a neutral pH was reached.
The solution was subsequently freeze-dried. PEG-g-chitosan was obtained by removal of PEG-aldehyde residue with excess
acetone. EtO gas was used to sterilize the PEG-g-chitosan
powder.
Characterization of PEG-g-chitosan
The chemical bonding between chitosan and PEG in PEG-g-chitosan was confirmed via 1H NMR spectroscopy, and 1H NMR spectra were acquired with a Bruker AV-301 spectrometer
with 500 MHz at 50 °C. PEG-g-chitosan samples
of 10–20 mg each were dissolved in D2O (0.7 mL)
with the addition of one drop of 0.5 M DCl in D2O.The thermoreversible gelation behavior of PCgel was further studied
by rheological measurements. Water-soluble PEG-g-chitosan
was reconstituted with RPMI to make a PEG-g-chitosan
hydrogel solution [PCgel, 1.5% (w/v)]. The solution was put on ice
for 4 h with periodic vortexing to make sure PEG-g-chitosan was fully dissolved. The continuous viscosity change of
PCgel was measured as a function of time and temperature using an
Anton Paar MCR 301 stress-controlled rheometer with a 25 mm cone and
plate configuration and a 1° cone angle. The shear viscosity
of the PCgel was measured over a temperature range of 0–45
°C at a fixed shear rate of 30 s–1. In a typical
experiment, a constant oscillation frequency of 1 Hz and a strain
of 10% (will not affect the formation of the gel) were used. The temperature
was ramped at a rate of 1 °C/min to obtain values for the storage
and loss modules (G′ and G″, respectively) and to allow sufficient time for the sample
temperature to equilibrate.[23] The gelation
time of PCgel was 8–12 min as tested in a water bath maintained
at 37 °C.
Preparation of Genetically Engineered Cytotoxic
T Lymphocytes
T lymphocytes were isolated from primary peripheral
blood mononuclear
cells (PBMCs). Platelet apheresis products were collected from healthy
donors at the Puget Sound Blood Center. Cells were diluted in a 1/1.5
ratio with PBS containing 0.562 mM EDTA (Thermo Scientific, Waltham,
MA). PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque
(GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, U.K.), washed twice
in PBS-EDTA, washed once in PBS, and resuspended in Automacs Running
Buffer (Miltenyi) at a density of 106 cells/mL. The PBMC
population after depleting CD8– cells and CD45 RA+ cells using
the MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotech) was enriched for CD62L+ to isolate
CD8+ central memory T lymphocytes (CD8+CD45RO+CD62L+). T lymphocytes
were expanded in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine,
50 IU/mL recombinant humaninterleukin 2 (IL-2), and 1 ng/mL recombinant
humaninterleukin 15 (IL-15). At the completion of T lymphocyte isolation,
the cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (Life Technologies).
Lentiviral spinoculation of T lymphocytes was conducted on day 3 of
the culture by adding a viral volume necessary to obtain a multiplicity
of infection (MOI) of 3 and centrifuging at 800g for
30 min at 32 °C. An anti-EGFR chimeric antigen receptor molecule,
which recognizes cell-surface EGFR on target glioblastoma cells, was
introduced into isolated CD8+ central memory T lymphocytes using lentivirus
generated in HEK 293 cells. Transduced T lymphocytes were purified
using a surrogate marker of transduction (truncated nonsignaling EGFR
encoded by the lentivirus construct). For the sake of simplicity,
these genetically modified T lymphocytes were termed to T lymphocytes,
and the T lymphocyte without the genetic modification was termed Mock.
Transfection and Cell Culture of U-87 MG
U-87 MG cells
were transiently transfected with pRFP-N2 using Lipofectamine 2000
reagent, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight
hours after transfection, the cells were washed with PBS and supplied
with fresh medium and then selected with G418-rich medium (500 μg/mL).
Two weeks after being selected, the cells were sorted by fluorescence-activated
cell sorting (FACS) (Vantage SE). For the sake of simplicity, U-87
MG+RFP is abbreviated as U-87 MG hereafter. U-87 MG were maintained
in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% AA. The medium was refreshed
every 2 days.
Assessment of Cell Proliferation
Proliferation of T
lymphocytes was assessed using the oxidation–reduction indicator
AlamarBlue (Alamar BioSciences, Sacramento, CA), according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, prior to the assay, cells
on a tissue culture plate (TCP) or in the PCgel or Matrigel are replaced
with 1 mL of 9-fold diluted AlamarBlue (diluted with PBS, 110 μg/mL)
for immersion for 8 h. The diluted AB solution was then collected,
and the centrifuged supernatant was transferred to a 96-well black-walled
plate. The absorbance of the solution was measured spectrophotometrically
with a microplate reader at 540 nm. The cell number was calculated
on the basis of standard curves of known numbers of T lymphocytes.
The results are presented as means with the standard deviation (n = 6).
T Lymphocyte Invasion Assay
T lymphocyte
invasion assessment
was adopted from a previous study.[24] T
lymphocyte invasion was evaluated using a 24-well, 3.0 μm pore
size transwell plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA) precoated with 200 μL
of the PCgel. The density of T lymphocytes were adjusted to 2 ×
107 cells/mL in regular medium without FBS. An aliquot
(50 μL) of the cell suspension containing 1 × 106 T lymphocytes was placed in the top of the PCgel-precoated transwell;
500 μL of regular medium with 10% FBS was added to the bottom
chamber of the transwell. After incubation for specific time intervals
of 0.5, 1 3, 5, 19, 24, 48, and 96 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, the top chamber was removed, and the number of
T lymphocytes that had invaded the bottom chamber was counted under
a microscope.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Images
of Cells
T cells on the PCgel were fixed before SEM analysis.
Briefly, samples
were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in complete medium for 30 min
at 37 °C. After being fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium
cacodylate buffer at 4 °C overnight and dehydration in serial
ethanol washes (0, 30, 50, 70, 85, 95, and 100%), the samples were
dried by critical point, mounted, and sputter coated with platinum.
Samples were imaged with a JSM-7000F SEM instrument (JEOL, Tokyo,
Japan) at 10 kV and 5 nA. The average diameter of the pore size of
the gel was determined by measuring the diameters of the pores at
100 different points in three 2000× SEM images using ImageJ (National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) as reported previously.[25]
Fluorescence Images and Flow Cytometry
Fluorescent
imaging and flow cytometry were applied to confirm the invasive T
lymphocytes retained the anti-glioblastoma activity. For fluorescent
imaging, the interaction between the invasive T lymphocytes (Green
Cell Tracker-labeled) and U-87 MG was imaged using a fluorescence
microscope (Nikon TE 300) after the T lymphocytes invaded from the
PCgel or Matrigel precoated transwell plates. For flow cytometry,
the cells from all conditions were stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable
Dead Cell Stain Kit (Violet Dead Cell Stain, Invitrogen) and analyzed
on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The data
were analyzed and plotted using FlowJo (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR).
Statistical Analysis
The results are presented as means
of triplicate samples ± the standard deviation. The statistical
difference was determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Values were considered to be statistically significant
at P < 0.05 (asterisks).
Results and Discussion
Physicochemical
Properties of the PCgel
Panels a and
b of Figure 1 show the chemical structure of
PEG-g-chitosan and the 1H NMR spectra
of PEG-g-chitosan and pure chitosan, respectively.
The characteristic signals of PEG-g-chitosan were
as follows: δ 4.9–5.0 (H-1), 3.6–4.3 (H-3, H-4,
H-5, H-6, H-8, H-9, and H-10), 3.4 (H-11), 3.1–3.3 (H-2), and
2.1 ppm (H-7). The characteristic signals of pure chitosan were as
follows: δ 5.0–5.2 (H-1), 3.7–4.2 (H-3, H-4, H-5,
and H-6), 3.3–3.5 (H-2), and 2.25 ppm (H-7).[20,21] Compared to those of pure chitosan, the peaks of PEG-g-chitosan in the range of 3.6–3.9 ppm were not well separated,
because of the overlap of the more intense peak of the PEG methylene
groups with those of the saccharide backbone of chitosan. Furthermore,
the methyl group of PEG in PEG-g-chitosan was seen
clearly at 3.4 ppm.[26] The observed changes
in NMR analysis confirmed the successful grafting of PEG onto chitosan,
and the grafted PEG in PEG-g-chitosan was determined
to be 60 wt %.
Figure 1
Chemistry of PEG-g-chitosan. (a) Chemical
structure
of PEG-g-chitosan. PEG is framed by the small dashed
rectangle and chitosan by the large dashed rectangle. (b) NMR analysis
of PEG-g-chitosan (purple) and pure chitosan (black).
HOD is the abbreviation for deuterium oxide.
Chemistry of PEG-g-chitosan. (a) Chemical
structure
of PEG-g-chitosan. PEG is framed by the small dashed
rectangle and chitosan by the large dashed rectangle. (b) NMR analysis
of PEG-g-chitosan (purple) and pure chitosan (black).
HOD is the abbreviation for deuterium oxide.The sol-to-gel transition behavior of PCgel was tested by
rheological
analyses. Figure 2a shows the viscosity of
the PCgel as a function of temperature. The viscosity slightly decreased
as the temperature increased from 4 to ∼25 °C. When the
temperature approached 25–30 °C, an abrupt and significant
increase in viscosity was observed. The viscosity remained at the
elevated constant level after the temperature reached 32 °C until
the temperature reached 45 °C. Figure 2b represents the changes in the storage modulus (G′) and the loss modulus (G″) for the
PCgel as a function of temperature.
Figure 2
Rheological properties of PCgel. (a) Shear
viscosity and (b) storage
modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) as a function of temperature.
Rheological properties of PCgel. (a) Shear
viscosity and (b) storage
modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) as a function of temperature.When the sample temperatures were below 32 °C, the G′ and G″ values remained
around 1 Pa, indicating that the samples remained in a liquid state.
When the temperature increased above 32 °C, both modulus values
increased drastically to 100 Pa (G″) and 1000
Pa (G′), respectively. The transition from
liquidlike behavior to elastic gel-like behavior occurred at the crossover
point of G′ and G″,
which was observed at approximately 32 °C.
T Lymphocyte
Viability in the PCgel
Cell viability
is the most fundamental feature of cellular compatibility for biomedical
materials. The viability of genetically modified T lymphocytes in
the PCgel was assessed with the AlamarBlue assay. Specifically, 3
× 105 T lymphocytes were loaded evenly in 400 μL
of the liquid PCgel onto 24-well cell culture plates. The T lymphocyte-loaded
PCgel was then placed in an incubator for solidification. An additional
400 μL of culture medium was added on top of the solidified
PCgel 2 h after T lymphocyte cell seeding. A blank standard TCP and
Matrigel were used as two-dimensional and three-dimensional controls,
respectively. Twenty-four hours after T lymphocyte seeding, the culture
medium was replaced with AlamarBlue for 8 h. The AlamarBlue solution
was then collected, and the centrifuged supernatant was transferred
to a 96-well black-walled plate for quantifying the number of live
cells. Figure 3 shows the number of T cells
on a TCP, in the PCgel, and in Matrigel. Though the number of T lymphocytes
in the PCgel was observed to be slightly lower than that of a TCP
(89%; 0.353) and slightly higher
than that of Matrigel (113%; p = 0.184), there was
no statistical difference among the three tested materials (p = 0.156). This confirmed that the PCgel had good cellular
compatibility with T lymphocytes.
Figure 3
Biocompatibility of the PCgel. The numbers
of T lymphocytes cultured
on a TCP, PCgel, and Matrigel quantified using AlamarBlue after a
24 h culture.
Biocompatibility of the PCgel. The numbers
of T lymphocytes cultured
on a TCP, PCgel, and Matrigel quantified using AlamarBlue after a
24 h culture.
T Lymphocyte Invasion through
the PCgel
To act as a
depot for sustained T lymphocyte release, the PCgel must have appropriate
pore sizes to allow for T lymphocyte invasion out of the matrix. Previous
studies have demonstrated lymphocyte invasion through three-dimensional
gels of native collagen fibers.[27] The kinetics
of penetration of lymphocytes into the gel matrix indicated that lymphocytes
migrate in a “random-walk” fashion through this collagen
matrix that had a pore size of 2 μm, comparable to that of T
lymphocytes (approximately 1–2 μm in diameter). This
large pore size likely explains the random-walk movement of T lymphocytes
because they were able to freely move throughout the collagen gel
with pore sizes slightly larger than the cells. To act as a controlled
release depot for T lymphocytes, the pore sizes must be small enough
to prevent the random walk so the cells must actively invade out of
the gel but large enough for the cells to invade through. SEM images
of the PCgel (Figure 4a,b) and Matrigel (Figure 4d,e) revealed larger pores in the PCgel and in Matrigel.
The 0.5–1 μm pore size distribution of the PCgel (Figure 4c) was more suitable for T lymphocyte invasion than
that of Matrigel that had more small pore sizes [0.1–0.5 μm
(Figure 4f)].
Figure 4
Pore size evaluation of gels. SEM images
of T lymphocytes in the
process of invading through (a and b) the PCgel and (d and e) Matrigel
after 20 h. The scale bars in panels a and d are 4 μm and in
panels b and e 1 μm. (c and f) Distributions of the pore sizes
of the (c) PCgel and (f) Matrigel.
Pore size evaluation of gels. SEM images
of T lymphocytes in the
process of invading through (a and b) the PCgel and (d and e) Matrigel
after 20 h. The scale bars in panels a and d are 4 μm and in
panels b and e 1 μm. (c and f) Distributions of the pore sizes
of the (c) PCgel and (f) Matrigel.T lymphocytes at the surface of both matrices 20 h after
seeding
were observed to retain a similar characteristic morphology of a uniformly
round, small shape. Moreover, there was an apparent reduction in the
density of T lymphocytes remaining on the surface of the PCgel as
compared that on the surface of Matrigel (Figure 4a,d), suggesting that T lymphocytes were more effective in
infiltrating the PCgel than Matrigels. This might be due to the fact
that the PC gel has pore sizes larger than those of Matrigel.Time course
of therapeutic T lymphocyte invasion through the PCgel
and Matrigel. The statistical differences in therapeutic T lymphocyte
invasion through the PCgel vs through Matrigel are labeled with asterisks
(p < 0.05).The increased capacity of the PCgel for T lymphocytes to
invade
was further confirmed through quantification of cells in a transwell
invasion assay (Figure 5). It was found that
4 times as many T lymphocytes invaded through the PCgel as compared
to Matrigel after 100 h. In addition, sustained invasion of T lymphocytes
through the PCgel was observed with an approximately linear increase
in the number of invaded T lymphocytes over time. This was likely
a result of the appropriate pore size and biocompatibility of the
PCgel for T lymphocytes.
Figure 5
Time course
of therapeutic T lymphocyte invasion through the PCgel
and Matrigel. The statistical differences in therapeutic T lymphocyte
invasion through the PCgel vs through Matrigel are labeled with asterisks
(p < 0.05).
Specific Binding to and Effective Killing
of U-87 MG by Invading
T Lymphocytes
To decide the ratio of T cells to U-87 MG cells
for optimized tumor cell death, different amounts of T lymphocytes
were added 2 h after 1 × 104 U-87 MG cells had been
seeded. AlamarBlue was used to quantify the number of viable U-87
MG cells, which was quantified by AlamarBlue after T lymphocytes were
added for 24 h and each well was washed thrice with PBS to ensure
no residual T lymphocytes. The tumor killing ability measurement revealed
that the highest tumor cell kill was observed at the highest T lymphocyte/U-87
MG ratio (100/1) and not the smaller ratios (50/1, 25/1, 10/1, and
3/1), following coculture of therapeutic T lymphocytes and U-87 MG
on a TCP (Figure 6). The same ratio of T cells
to U-87 MG cells of 100/1 was also applied to Mock as a positive control.
Therefore, the ratio of T cells to U-87 MG cells of 100/1 was selected
for the following study.
Figure 6
Percentage of U-87 MG tumor cell death after
T lymphocyte treatment
at various effector/target (T lymphocyte/U87) ratios (1/0, 3/1 to
100/1). Mock was applied as a negative control.
Percentage of U-87 MG tumor cell death after
T lymphocyte treatment
at various effector/target (T lymphocyte/U87) ratios (1/0, 3/1 to
100/1). Mock was applied as a negative control.Once the T lymphocytes invade through the PCgel, they must
remain
functionally active to specifically target glioblastoma cells. To
investigate if T lymphocytes invading through gels specifically bind
to tumor cells, 104 U-87 MG cells were seeded on a TCP
as the lower chamber of the transwell device and T lymphocytes were
seeded onto transwell plates precoated with the PCgel or Matrigel
(as control) the following day. The upper chamber was dissembled from
the lower chamber 20 h after the addition of T lymphocytes. The interaction
between the invasive T lymphocytes and U-87 MG cells was imaged using
a fluorescence microscope. The number of T lymphocytes bound to U-87
MG cells was quantified by counting on 10 random fields and was reported
in number per field of view. Panels a and b of Figure 7 show the interaction of invasive T lymphocytes with the U-87
MG cells after invading through the transwell PCgel and Matrigel,
respectively. Green T lymphocytes were observed binding to red U-87
MG cells in the PCgel condition, but very few T lymphocytes were observed
in the Matrigel condition. Indeed, quantification of bound T lymphocytes
revealed there were significantly more T lymphocytes bound to U-87
MG cells in the PCgel transwell invasion condition than in the Matrigel
transwell invasion condition [p = 0.0258 (Figure 7c)].
Figure 7
Recognition of U-87 MG cells and invasive T lymphocytes.
Fluorescence
images of T lymphocytes (green) attached to U-87 MG cells (red) after
invading through the transwell under (a) PCgel and (b) Matrigel conditions.
Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). The scale bar is 10 μm.
(c) Quantification of bound T lymphocytes through either the PCgel
or Matrigel to U-87 MG cells (at 60× magnification from 10 different
fields of view on fluorescent images). Data are representative of
two experiments conducted in duplicate. The statistical difference
with Matrigel was labeled with an asterisk (p <
0.05).
Recognition of U-87 MG cells and invasive T lymphocytes.
Fluorescence
images of T lymphocytes (green) attached to U-87 MG cells (red) after
invading through the transwell under (a) PCgel and (b) Matrigel conditions.
Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). The scale bar is 10 μm.
(c) Quantification of bound T lymphocytes through either the PCgel
or Matrigel to U-87 MG cells (at 60× magnification from 10 different
fields of view on fluorescent images). Data are representative of
two experiments conducted in duplicate. The statistical difference
with Matrigel was labeled with an asterisk (p <
0.05).To confirm T lymphocytes that
bound to target U-87 MG cells could
induce cell death, a live/dead flow cytometry assay was performed
to determine the number of U-87 MG cells killed by T lymphocytes that
invaded through the PCgel or Matrigel (control). For this study, 104 U-87 MG cells were first seeded on a TCP as the lower chamber
of the transwell device and T lymphocytes were seeded onto transwell
plates precoated with 200 μL of the PCgel or Matrigel for 1
day. The upper chamber was then dissembled from the lower chamber
20 h after the addition of T lymphocytes. U-87 MG cells without any
treatment were used as negative control cells, and U-87 MG wells were
treated with heat (60 °C, 4 h) and 2 mM H2O2 for 4 h as positive control wells. Cells from all conditions were
harvested after treatments, stained with the LIVE/DEAD kit, and analyzed
by flow cytometry. U-87 MG+RFP cells were gated and analyzed for the
percentage of dead cells (i.e., BV 450-A+).Figure 8a shows that there were more dead
U-87 MG cells (BV 450-A+) under the PCgel transwell invasion condition
than in the Matrigel. Figure 8b shows that
there were a large number of dead U-87 MG cells killed by heat or
H2O2. Moreover, quantitative analysis of the
flow cytometry data (Figure 8c) shows that
the frequency of U-87 MG death was significantly higher under the
PCgel transwell invasion condition than for untreated cells (p = 0.0003) and under the Matrigel transwell invasion condition
(p = 0.0057). This confirms the T lymphocytes that
invaded through the PCgel and bound to U-87 MG cells were active and
could induce a therapeutic response. Therefore, our study shows the
utility of the PCgel as a depot for release of T lymphocytes and a
convenient and valuable in vitro model for studying
clinically relevant improvements to glioblastoma immunotherapy.
Figure 8
Evaluation
of U-87 MG cell death by the live/dead flow cytometry
assay. (a and b) Flow cytometry histograms of the gated U-87 MG cell
population (RFP+) assessed for the percentage of dead cells (BV 450-A+)
after (a) invasive T lymphocyte through PCgel or Matrigel and (b)
H2O2 and heat as positive controls. Data for
the untreated U-87 MG cells are labeled as U87. (c) Quantification
of the percentage of dead cells based on BV 450-A positivity. Data
are representative of triplicate samples. The statistical difference
with untreated tumor cells (U87) is labeled with an asterisk (p < 0.05).
Evaluation
of U-87 MG cell death by the live/dead flow cytometry
assay. (a and b) Flow cytometry histograms of the gated U-87 MG cell
population (RFP+) assessed for the percentage of dead cells (BV 450-A+)
after (a) invasive T lymphocyte through PCgel or Matrigel and (b)
H2O2 and heat as positive controls. Data for
the untreated U-87 MG cells are labeled as U87. (c) Quantification
of the percentage of dead cells based on BV 450-A positivity. Data
are representative of triplicate samples. The statistical difference
with untreated tumor cells (U87) is labeled with an asterisk (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
We have demonstrated the utilization of
the thermoreversible PCgel
as a suitable depot for delivery of T lymphocytes for brain tumor
immunotherapy. The PCgel had appropriate pore sizes that could release
viable T lymphocytes. The PCgel is cellular compatible with T lymphocytes
and retains the anti-glioblastoma activity of T lymphocytes. When
the PCgel containing T lymphocytes contacts glioblastoma cells, T
cells released from the gel could effectively kill GBM cells. In addition,
the T cells in the PCgel were more effective in killing glioblastoma
than those in Matrigel. The PCgel is clinically preferable over Matrigel
and any other animal-sourced gels because of its excellent biocompatibility,
biodegradability, low immunogenicity, low potential for pathogen transfer,
low cost, and consistent properties from batch to batch. Our study
suggests that this unique PCgel depot may offer a viable approach
for localized immunotherapy for glioblastoma and have the potential
to improve glioblastoma immunotherapy.
Authors: Manfred Westphal; Dana C Hilt; Enoch Bortey; Patrick Delavault; Robert Olivares; Peter C Warnke; Ian R Whittle; Juha Jääskeläinen; Zvi Ram Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Stephen J Florczyk; Kui Wang; Soumen Jana; David L Wood; Samara K Sytsma; Jonathan Sham; Forrest M Kievit; Miqin Zhang Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Kanwarpal S Kahlon; Christine Brown; Laurence J N Cooper; Andrew Raubitschek; Stephen J Forman; Michael C Jensen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christina Karavasili; Emmanuel Panteris; Ioannis S Vizirianakis; Sotirios Koutsopoulos; Dimitrios G Fatouros Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Ahmet F Atik; Carter M Suryadevara; Ryan M Schweller; Jennifer L West; Patrick Healy; James E Herndon Ii; Kendra L Congdon; Luis Sanchez-Perez; Roger E McLendon; Gerald E Archer; Peter Fecci; John H Sampson Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 1.961