PURPOSE: Novel agents are currently combined with radiation and temozolomide (RT + TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using overall survival as the primary end point. Results of these phase II studies are typically compared with the phase III European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) survival data that resulted in RT + TMZ becoming standard therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) Consortium assigned 365 patients with glioblastoma to four single-cohort studies with similar eligibility criteria. Patients received RT + TMZ with talampanel (n = 72), poly-ICLC (n = 97), or cilengitide (n = 112) or RT + TMZ alone with monitoring of CD4 counts (n = 84). Overall survival of those ages 18 to 70 years with glioblastoma was compared with published EORTC data. RESULTS: NABTT and EORTC patients had comparable performance status and debulking surgery. Median, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates for the EORTC patients (n = 287) and the comparable NABTT patients receiving RT + TMZ and novel agents (n = 244) are 14.6 versus 19.6 months, 61% versus 81%, and 27% versus 37%, respectively. This represents a 37% reduction in odds of death (P < 0.0001) through 2 years of follow-up. NABTT and EORTC patients receiving only RT + TMZ had similar survival. CONCLUSIONS: Newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated recently with RT + TMZ and talampanel, poly-ICLC, or cilengitide had significantly longer survival than similar patients treated with only RT + TMZ accrued internationally from 2000 to 2002. These differences could result from the novel agents or changing patterns of care. Until the reasons for these different survival rates are clarified, comparisons of outcomes from phase II studies with published RT + TMZ survival data should be interpreted with caution.
PURPOSE: Novel agents are currently combined with radiation and temozolomide (RT + TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using overall survival as the primary end point. Results of these phase II studies are typically compared with the phase III European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) survival data that resulted in RT + TMZ becoming standard therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) Consortium assigned 365 patients with glioblastoma to four single-cohort studies with similar eligibility criteria. Patients received RT + TMZ with talampanel (n = 72), poly-ICLC (n = 97), or cilengitide (n = 112) or RT + TMZ alone with monitoring of CD4 counts (n = 84). Overall survival of those ages 18 to 70 years with glioblastoma was compared with published EORTC data. RESULTS:NABTT and EORTCpatients had comparable performance status and debulking surgery. Median, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates for the EORTCpatients (n = 287) and the comparable NABTTpatients receiving RT + TMZ and novel agents (n = 244) are 14.6 versus 19.6 months, 61% versus 81%, and 27% versus 37%, respectively. This represents a 37% reduction in odds of death (P < 0.0001) through 2 years of follow-up. NABTT and EORTCpatients receiving only RT + TMZ had similar survival. CONCLUSIONS: Newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated recently with RT + TMZ and talampanel, poly-ICLC, or cilengitide had significantly longer survival than similar patients treated with only RT + TMZ accrued internationally from 2000 to 2002. These differences could result from the novel agents or changing patterns of care. Until the reasons for these different survival rates are clarified, comparisons of outcomes from phase II studies with published RT + TMZ survival data should be interpreted with caution.
Authors: Manfred Westphal; Dana C Hilt; Enoch Bortey; Patrick Delavault; Robert Olivares; Peter C Warnke; Ian R Whittle; Juha Jääskeläinen; Zvi Ram Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Santosh Kesari; David Schiff; John W Henson; Alona Muzikansky; Debra C Gigas; Lisa Doherty; Tracy T Batchelor; Janina A Longtine; Keith L Ligon; Susan Weaver; Andrea Laforme; Naren Ramakrishna; Peter McL Black; Jan Drappatz; Abigail Ciampa; Judah Folkman; Mark Kieran; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Henry S Friedman; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; James Vredenburgh; Jane Huang; Maoxia Zheng; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yohei Mineharu; Gwendalyn D King; A K M G Muhammad; Serguei Bannykh; Kurt M Kroeger; Chunyan Liu; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lorenzo Trippa; Eudocia Q Lee; Patrick Y Wen; Tracy T Batchelor; Timothy Cloughesy; Giovanni Parmigiani; Brian M Alexander Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shadi Lalezari; Arthur P Chou; Anh Tran; Orestes E Solis; Negar Khanlou; Weidong Chen; Sichen Li; Jose A Carrillo; Reshmi Chowdhury; Julia Selfridge; Desiree E Sanchez; Ryan W Wilson; Mira Zurayk; Jonathan Lalezari; Jerry J Lou; Laurel Ormiston; Karen Ancheta; Robert Hanna; Paul Miller; David Piccioni; Benjamin M Ellingson; Colin Buchanan; Paul S Mischel; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Richard Green; He-Jing Wang; Whitney B Pope; Linda M Liau; Robert M Elashoff; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong; Albert Lai Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Robert Dubrow; Amy S Darefsky; Daniel I Jacobs; Lesley S Park; Michal G Rose; Maxwell S H Laurans; Joseph T King Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Michael G Brandel; Ali A Alattar; Brian R Hirshman; Xuezhi Dong; Kate T Carroll; Mir Amaan Ali; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 4.130