Literature DB >> 24889489

Genomic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: refining prognosis and identifying therapeutic targets.

Andrew X Zhu1, Darrell R Borger, Yuhree Kim, David Cosgrove, Aslam Ejaz, Sorin Alexandrescu, Ryan Thomas Groeschl, Vikram Deshpande, James M Lindberg, Cristina Ferrone, Christine Sempoux, Thomas Yau, Ronnie Poon, Irinel Popescu, Todd W Bauer, T Clark Gamblin, Jean Francois Gigot, Robert A Anders, Timothy M Pawlik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The molecular alterations that drive tumorigenesis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remain poorly defined. We sought to determine the incidence and prognostic significance of mutations associated with ICC among patients undergoing surgical resection.
METHODS: Multiplexed mutational profiling was performed using nucleic acids that were extracted from 200 resected ICC tumor specimens from 7 centers. The frequency of mutations was ascertained and the effect on outcome was determined.
RESULTS: The majority of patients (61.5 %) had no genetic mutation identified. Among the 77 patients (38.5 %) with a genetic mutation, only a small number of gene mutations were identified with a frequency of >5 %: IDH1 (15.5 %) and KRAS (8.6 %). Other genetic mutations were identified in very low frequency: BRAF (4.9 %), IDH2 (4.5 %), PIK3CA (4.3 %), NRAS (3.1 %), TP53 (2.5 %), MAP2K1 (1.9 %), CTNNB1 (0.6 %), and PTEN (0.6 %). Among patients with an IDH1-mutant tumor, approximately 7 % were associated with a concurrent PIK3CA gene mutation or a mutation in MAP2K1 (4 %). No concurrent mutations in IDH1 and KRAS were noted. Compared with ICC tumors that had no identified mutation, IDH1-mutant tumors were more often bilateral (odds ratio 2.75), while KRAS-mutant tumors were more likely to be associated with R1 margin (odds ratio 6.51) (both P < 0.05). Although clinicopathological features such as tumor number and nodal status were associated with survival, no specific mutation was associated with prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Most somatic mutations in resected ICC tissue are found at low frequency, supporting a need for broad-based mutational profiling in these patients. IDH1 and KRAS were the most common mutations noted. Although certain mutations were associated with ICC clinicopathological features, mutational status did not seemingly affect long-term prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24889489      PMCID: PMC4324507          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3828-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  34 in total

Review 1.  Genetic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jesper B Andersen; Snorri S Thorgeirsson
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.287

2.  Specific TP53 and/or Ki-ras mutations as independent predictors of clinical outcome in sporadic colorectal adenocarcinomas: results of a 5-year Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale (GOIM) prospective study.

Authors:  V Bazan; V Agnese; S Corsale; V Calò; M R Valerio; M A Latteri; S Vieni; N Grassi; G Cicero; G Dardanoni; R M Tomasino; G Colucci; N Gebbia; A Russo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Integrative molecular analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals 2 classes that have different outcomes.

Authors:  Daniela Sia; Yujin Hoshida; Augusto Villanueva; Sasan Roayaie; Joana Ferrer; Barbara Tabak; Judit Peix; Manel Sole; Victoria Tovar; Clara Alsinet; Helena Cornella; Brandy Klotzle; Jian-Bing Fan; Christian Cotsoglou; Swan N Thung; Josep Fuster; Samuel Waxman; Juan Carlos Garcia-Valdecasas; Jordi Bruix; Myron E Schwartz; Rameen Beroukhim; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Sosman; Kevin B Kim; Lynn Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C Pavlick; Jeffrey S Weber; Grant A McArthur; Thomas E Hutson; Stergios J Moschos; Keith T Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D Lewis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and molecular therapies.

Authors:  Beatriz Mínguez; Victoria Tovar; Derek Chiang; Augusto Villanueva; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.287

7.  Genetic and epigenetic alterations of the INK4a-ARF pathway in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Andrea Tannapfel; Florian Sommerer; Markus Benicke; Lars Weinans; Alexander Katalinic; Felix Geissler; Dirk Uhlmann; Johann Hauss; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  Yuchen Jiao; Timothy M Pawlik; Robert A Anders; Florin M Selaru; Mirte M Streppel; Donald J Lucas; Noushin Niknafs; Violeta Beleva Guthrie; Anirban Maitra; Pedram Argani; G Johan A Offerhaus; Juan Carlos Roa; Lewis R Roberts; Gregory J Gores; Irinel Popescu; Sorin T Alexandrescu; Simona Dima; Matteo Fassan; Michele Simbolo; Andrea Mafficini; Paola Capelli; Rita T Lawlor; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Filippo de Braud; Aldo Scarpa; William Jarnagin; David Klimstra; Rachel Karchin; Victor E Velculescu; Ralph H Hruban; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Laura D Wood
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Authors:  Patrick S Ward; Jay Patel; David R Wise; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Bryson D Bennett; Hilary A Coller; Justin R Cross; Valeria R Fantin; Cyrus V Hedvat; Alexander E Perl; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Martin Carroll; Shinsan M Su; Kim A Sharp; Ross L Levine; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 38.585

10.  Molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma shows potential for targeted therapy treatment decisions.

Authors:  Jesse S Voss; Leonard M Holtegaard; Sarah E Kerr; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Lewis R Roberts; Gregory J Gores; Jun Zhang; W Edward Highsmith; Kevin C Halling; Benjamin R Kipp
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.526

View more
  55 in total

1.  Hybrid Capture-Based Tumor Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis to Confirm Origin of Metachronous Metastases in BRCA1-Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma Harboring a Novel YWHAZ-BRAF Fusion.

Authors:  Huat C Lim; Meagan Montesion; Thomas Botton; Eric A Collisson; Sarah E Umetsu; Spencer C Behr; John D Gordan; Phil J Stephens; Robin K Kelley
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-05

2.  Molecular profiling of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Juan Putra; Francine B de Abreu; Jason D Peterson; J Marc Pipas; Kabir Mody; Christopher I Amos; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.362

3.  Impressive response to dual BRAF and MEK inhibition in patients with BRAF mutant intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-2 case reports and a brief review.

Authors:  Viraj Lavingia; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

4.  Next-generation sequencing survey of biliary tract cancer reveals the association between tumor somatic variants and chemotherapy resistance.

Authors:  James L Chen; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Daniel H Ahn; Milind Javle; Chul W Ahn; Apurva Jain; Sameh Mikhail; Anne M Noonan; Kristen Ciombor; Christina Wu; Rachna T Shroff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Targeting cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Joachim C Mertens; Sumera Rizvi; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.187

6.  Distinct histomorphological features are associated with IDH1 mutation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Esther Drill; Efsevia Vakiani; Linda Ma Pak; Thomas Boerner; Gokce Askan; Juan Manuel Schvartzman; Amber L Simpson; William R Jarnagin; Carlie S Sigel
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  Cholangiocarcinoma - evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Sumera Rizvi; Shahid A Khan; Christopher L Hallemeier; Robin K Kelley; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Liver Transplantation for Cholangiocarcinoma: Insights into the Prognosis and the Evolving Indications.

Authors:  Guergana G Panayotova; Flavio Paterno; James V Guarrera; Keri E Lunsford
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  A Case of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Diagnosed Through Identification of an IDH1 Mutation.

Authors:  Suneel Deepak Kamath; Xiaoqi Lin; Aparna Kalyan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 10.  Precision medicine in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Pellino; Fotios Loupakis; Massimiliano Cadamuro; Vincenzo Dadduzio; Matteo Fassan; Maria Guido; Umberto Cillo; Stefano Indraccolo; Luca Fabris
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.