| Literature DB >> 24886815 |
Collins Njie Ateba1, Moses Mbewe2.
Abstract
In many developing countries, proper hygiene is not strictly implemented when animals are slaughtered and meat products become contaminated. Contaminated meat may contain Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 that could cause diseases in humans if these food products are consumed undercooked. In the present study, a total of 94 confirmed E. coli O157:H7 isolates were subjected to the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing to generate genetic fingerprints. The ERIC fragments were resolved by electrophoresis on 2% (w/v) agarose gels. The presence, absence and intensity of band data were obtained, exported to Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 2003) and used to generate a data matrix. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and complete linkage algorithms were used to analyze the percentage of similarity and matrix data. Relationships between the various profiles and/or lanes were expressed as dendrograms. Data from groups of related lanes were compiled and reported on cluster tables. ERIC fragments ranged from one to 15 per isolate, and their sizes varied from 0.25 to 0.771 kb. A large proportion of the isolates produced an ERIC banding pattern with three duplets ranging in sizes from 0.408 to 0.628 kb. Eight major clusters (I-VIII) were identified. Overall, the remarkable similarities (72% to 91%) between the ERIC profiles for the isolate from animal species and their corresponding food products indicated some form of contamination, which may not exclude those at the level of the abattoirs. These results reveal that ERIC PCR analysis can be reliable in comparing the genetic profiles of E. coli O157:H7 from different sources in the North-West Province of South Africa.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24886815 PMCID: PMC4100117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms15069735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) polymerase chain reaction(PCR) profiles of representative Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 isolates from the different sources. Lanes E1 and E21, 1 kb DNA ladder; Lanes E2–E6, isolates from water samples; Lanes E7–E13, isolates from cattle feces; Lanes E14–E20, isolates from beef; Lanes E22–E28, isolates from pig feces; Lanes E29–E34, isolates from pork samples; Lane E35, isolate from human stool samples.
Figure 2Dendrogram showing the relationship of E. coli O157:H7 isolated using the ERIC PCR analysis.
Proportion of Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 from different species and/or sources with the various clusters based on the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis. N, number of isolates with similar fingerprints/genetic profiles.
| Specie/Source | Sample Type/Site | Cluster I
| Cluster II
| Cluster III
| Cluster IV
| Cluster V
| Cluster VI
| Cluster VII
| Cluster VIII
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle | Mafikeng feces | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mafikeng beef | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lichtenburg feces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lichtenburg beef | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Koster feces | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Koster beef | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Zeerust feces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rustenburg feces | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rustenburg beef | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pigs | Mafikeng feces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| Mafikeng pork | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lichtenburg feces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | |
| Lichtenburg pork | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Koster feces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| Koster pork | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Zeerust feces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Zeerust pork | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Rustenburg feces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rustenburg pork | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Humans | Mafikeng (feces) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Water | Koster (Tap) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Koster (River) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Area of collection, source, nature and number of samples collected during the study.
| Sample Source | Sampling Area | Nature of Sample | Number of Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pigs | Koster | Fecal sample | 8 |
| Lichtenburg | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Mafikeng | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Rustenburg | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Zeerust | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Pigs | Koster | Pork | 8 |
| Lichtenburg | Pork | 8 | |
| Mafikeng | Pork | 8 | |
| Rustenburg | Pork | 8 | |
| Zeerust | Pork | 8 | |
| Bovine | Koster | Fecal sample | 8 |
| Lichtenburg | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Mafikeng | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Rustenburg | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Zeerust | Fecal sample | 8 | |
| Bovine | Koster | Beef | 8 |
| Lichtenburg | Beef | 8 | |
| Mafikeng | Beef | 8 | |
| Rustenburg | Beef | 8 | |
| Zeerust | Beef | 8 | |
| Water | Koster | Water | 8 |
| Lichtenburg | Water | 8 | |
| Mafikeng | Water | 8 | |
| Rustenburg | Water | 8 | |
| Zeerust | Water | 8 | |
| Human | Mafikeng Provincial Hospital | Fecal sample | 20 |
Number of E. coli O157:H7 isolates from the different species and/or sources that were used for genotypic typing. NT, not tested.
| Source | Humans | Pigs | Cattle | Water | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feces | Feces | Pork | Feces | Beef | Taps | River Catchment | ||
| Mafikeng | 1 | 15 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| Lichtenburg | NT | 11 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| Koster | NT | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| Rustenburg | NT | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| Zeerust | NT | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 1 | 43 | 20 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 94 |