Literature DB >> 29263587

Genotyping of virulent Escherichia coli obtained from poultry and poultry farm workers using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction.

M Soma Sekhar1, N Mohammad Sharif2, T Srinivasa Rao1, M Metta3.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to characterize virulent Escherichia coli isolated from different poultry species and poultry farm workers using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) genotyping.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fecal swabs from different poultry species (n=150) and poultry farm workers (n=15) were analyzed for E. coli and screened for virulence genes (stx1, stx2, eaeA, and hlyA) by multiplex PCR. Virulent E. coli was serotyped based on their "O" antigen and then genotyped using ERIC-PCR.
RESULTS: A total of 134 E. coli isolates (122/150 from poultry and 12/15 from farm workers) were recovered. Virulence genes were detected in a total of 12 isolates. Serological typing of the 12 virulent E. coli revealed nine different serotypes (O2, O49, O60, O63, O83, O101, O120, UT, and Rough). ERIC-PCR genotyping allowed discrimination of 12 virulent E. coli isolates into 11 ERIC-PCR genotypes. The numerical index of discrimination was 0.999.
CONCLUSION: Our findings provide information about the wide genetic diversity and discrimination of virulent E. coli in apparently healthy poultry and poultry farm workers of Andhra Pradesh (India) based on their genotype.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction; genotype; poultry; serotype; virulent

Year:  2017        PMID: 29263587      PMCID: PMC5732331          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1292-1296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


Introduction

Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) is known to cause a range of human foodborne illnesses such as hemorrhagic colitis (HC), hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) [1]. The pathogenicity of STEC is mainly mediated by virulence genes such as stx1 (Shiga toxin type-1), stx2 (Shiga toxin type-2), eaeA (encodes intimin, which facilitates intimate adherence of bacteria to intestinal epithelial cells, resulting in the production of attaching and effacing lesion), and hlyA (enterohemolysin) [2]. Foodborne disease outbreaks, HUS, TTP, and HC are associated with certain STEC O-serogroups mainly including O157, O26, O91, O103, O121, O113, O111, O145, O45, and O128 as well as untypeable groups [3-5]. Compared to cattle and sheep, which act as major reservoirs of STEC, a limited number of reports have been published on STEC from poultry species and their genetic relatedness with human STEC [6-8]. Bacterial genomes contain imperfect palindromic repeat sequences such as enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) sequence [9]. The distance between these repetitive sequences and frequency of repeated sequences vary with individual bacterial strains [10]. ERIC-PCR genotyping technique yields strain-specific unique multiband patterns obtained by the amplification of conserved ERIC sequences, thus discriminating individual bacterial strains [11]. ERIC-PCR technique can be effectively used to discriminate E. coli strains intra-serotypically into different genotypes [10]. Perusal of the available literature revealed the paucity of information regarding the intra-serotypic genetic diversity of virulent E. coli of poultry origin in India. Hence, the present research was undertaken to assess the genetic diversity of virulent E. coli isolated from poultry and poultry farm workers in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not necessary to pursue this study. However, samples were collected without harming birds. Informed consent was obtained from farm workers.

Sample collection and isolation of E. coli

Fecal swabs (n=150) from different poultry species, namely, chicken, ducks, quails, turkey, fancy birds (each 30), and poultry farm workers (n=15) were collected from three different poultry farms in Andhra Pradesh, India. Isolation and identification were done using Trypticase Soy Broth (Hi-Media), eosin methylene blue (EMB, HiMedia) agar, and MacConkey agar medium. The isolates were confirmed to be E. coli by standard biochemical tests [12] as well as by the PCR amplification of the E16S gene of E. coli using the primer pair (F, 5’- ATC AAC CGA GAT TCC CCC AGT-3’ and R, 5’- TCA CTA TCG GTC AGT CAG GAG-3’) [13]. Whole-cell DNA extraction was carried out by boiling and snap chilling method [14].

Detection of virulence genes by multiplex PCR

A multiplex (m)-PCR for the detection of stx1, stx2, eaeA, and hlyA genes in E. coli was carried out as described by Paton and Paton [1]. Primers used and their expected amplicon sizes are summarized in Table-1. The reaction was carried out in 10 µl volume containing 5.0 µl of PCR Master Mix (Takara Bio Inc., Japan), 0.22 µl of each forward and reverse primer (10.0 pmol/µl), 2.24 µl of nuclease-free water, and 1.0 µl of DNA template (75 ng/µl). Thermal cycling conditions were as follows - 35 cycles, each consisting denaturation at 95°C for 60 s, annealing at 65°C for 120 s, and elongation at 72°C for 90 s (for first 10 cycles), decrementing annealing temperature to 60°C by cycle 15; denaturation at 95°C for 60 s, annealing at 60°C 120 s, and elongation at 72°C 90 s (from cycle 15-25), and incrementing elongation time from 90 s to 150 s from cycles 26 to 35.
Table-1

Primers used for detection of virulence genes in E. coli.

PrimerPrimer sequence (5’-3’)Target gene nameAmplicon sizeReference
Stx 1F: ATAAATCGCCATTCGTTGACTACR: AGAACGCCCACTGAGATCATCShiga toxin-1180Paton and Paton (1998)
Stx 2F: GGCACTGTCTGAAACTGCTCCR: TCGCCAGTTATCTGACATTCTGShiga toxin-2255
eaeAF: GACCCGGCACAAGCATAAGCR: CCACCTGCAGCAACAAGAGGIntimin384
hlyAF: GCATCATCAAGCGTACGTTCCR: AATGAGCCAAGCTGGTTAAGCTHemolysin534

E. coli=Escherichia coli.

Primers used for detection of virulence genes in E. coli. E. coli=Escherichia coli.

Serotyping of virulent E. coli isolates

Serotyping of E. coli isolates positive for virulence genes was done at National Salmonella and Escherichia coli Center, Central Research Institute, Kasauli (Himachal Pradesh, India) on the basis of their “O” antigen.

ERIC-PCR genotyping of virulent E. coli isolates

Genotyping of virulent E. coli isolates was done using oligonucleotide primers, ERIC-1 (5’-ATG TAA GCT CCT GGG GAT TCA C-3’) and ERIC-2 (5’-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC G-3’) [15]. Reaction was carried out in 25 µl volume using 12 μl of Master Mix (Takara Bio Inc.), 1.5 µl of DNA template (100 ng/μl), 1.0 μl of each primer (20 pmol/μl), and 9.5 μl of nuclease-free water. The DNA amplifications were performed in the Eppendorf thermal cycler (USA) with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 7 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 1 min annealing at 50°C, 8 min of elongation at 65°C, and 16 min of final elongation at 65°C. Standardization of the ERIC-PCR reactions was done using the DNA from reference strain E. coli (MTCC 1610).

Analysis of DNA fingerprinting patterns

The PCR products were resolved by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis under 110V for 2 h [16]. Banding patterns were photographed using BIO-RAD Gel Documentation system (USA). The DNA fingerprints obtained were analyzed both by visual inspection and Image Lab Software (BIO-RAD). The position of bands was compared using 100 bp and 1 kb DNA ladder (Genei™, Bengaluru). Binary matrix was constructed based on the presence (1) or absence (0) of a particular band in the given strain. Dendrogram was constructed by “branch-and-bound method” using dollop program of PHYLIP software, version 3.6. Clusters were considered at a 70% similarity cutoff value. The similarity of banding patterns was determined using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The numerical index of discrimination was calculated using Simpson’s index of diversity, D = 1-1/N (N-1) ∑ nj (nj-1), where D corresponds to the discriminatory power, N corresponds to the total number of strains, and nj corresponds to the number of strains belonging to the jth type [17].

Results and Discussion

Isolation and identification of E. coli

Of the 150 poultry fecal swab samples analyzed, a total of 122 (81.3%) E. coli isolates were recovered (26/30 from chicken, 24/30 ducks, 23/30 quails, 24/30 turkey, and 25/30 fancy birds). Of the 15 human fecal swab samples analyzed, a total of 12 (80%) E. coli were recovered. All the E. coli isolates were able to produce green metallic-sheen colonies on EMB agar, lactose-fermenting pink colonies on MacConkey agar, and amplified E16S gene giving 231 bp amplicon. The present results were in accordance with the findings of earlier studies from Srinagar, India [18] and Sao Paulo, Brazil [8], where E. coli was isolated from 80.2% and 78.3% of the poultry fecal samples tested.

Virulence genes characterization

The multiplex-PCR assay revealed the presence of one or more virulence genes in a total of 12 (chicken, 3; ducks, 2; turkey, 2; fancy birds, 2; quails, 1; and humans, 2) isolates, with an overall frequency of 12% (10/122 E. coli) and 13% (2/15 E. coli) occurrence of virulence genes in poultry and poultry farm workers, respectively. All these 12 isolates were positive for both stx1 and eaeA genes, whereas hlyA gene was detected in eight isolates and stx2 gene in four isolates (Table-2). The previous studies on avian pathogenic E. coli by Parreira and Gyles [19] and Dutta et al. [7] revealed association of STEC with 53% and 23.8% of avian pathogenic E. coli isolates. However, the absence of STEC is also reported in another study where E. coli was recovered from apparently healthy birds [20]. In the present study, all the 12 E. coli isolates that were positive for at least one virulence gene carried both stx1 and eaeA genes, which is in agreement with the findings of other workers [7,19,20], who reported a higher percentage (>50%) of pathogenic E. coli isolates carrying stx1 and eaeA genes. However, in contrast to our study, Wani et al. [18] reported only 2.4% frequency of eaeA gene in E. coli from poultry.
Table-2

Serotypes and ERIC-PCR genotypes of virulent E. coli.

Number of samples testedNumber positive for E. coliE. coli positive for virulence genesNumber of E. coli isolates carrying particular virulence geneSerotypes detected in the virulent E. coliNumber of ERIC genotypes detected

stx1stx2eaeAhlyA
Chicken (30)2633232O2, O1203 (E1, E2, E3)
Ducks (30)2422-21O63, R2 (E4, E5)
Quails (30)2311-1-UT1 (E6)
Turkey (30)2422-22O83, UT2 (E7, E8)
Fancy birds (30)2522222O601 (E9, E9)
Humans (15)1222-21O49, O1012 (E10, E11)
Total (165)13412124128911

E. coli=Escherichia coli, ERIC=Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus, PCR=Polymerase chain reaction

Serotypes and ERIC-PCR genotypes of virulent E. coli. E. coli=Escherichia coli, ERIC=Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus, PCR=Polymerase chain reaction

Serological typing

Serotyping of 12 virulent E. coli isolates revealed nine different serotypes, of which O2, O60 and UT were predominant (two isolates each), followed by O49, O63, O83, O101, O120, and Rough (one isolate each). Detection of O2, O60, O120, and R serotypes among E. coli of avian origin in the present study was in accordance with a study from Jammu and Kashmir [18]. However, avian E. coli serotypes reported in other studies from India [6,7] were not detected in the present study, indicating the variable distribution of different serotypes of E. coli in different geographical regions of India.

ERIC-PCR genotypes among virulent E. coli

ERIC-PCR genotyping revealed 7-18 fragments resolved per isolate, ranging in size from slightly less than 100 bp to 2000 bp (Figure-1). The binary data of ERIC-PCR profiles showed highly polymorphic DNA fragments among the 12 virulent E. coli isolates and reference strain of E. coli, namely, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, and 20 amplicons detected in 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, and 2 isolates, respectively. ERIC-PCR profiles revealed 11 ERIC-PCR genotypes discriminated among 12 E. coli isolates. The two virulent E. coli isolates (F1 and F2) recovered from fancy birds displayed a single ERIC-PCR fingerprinting profile (E9) (Figure-1). Interestingly, these two isolates shared same “O” serotype (O60) as well. The present observations were in accordance with the findings of Prabhu et al. [10], who assessed the utility of ERIC-PCR technique for the intra-serotypic differentiation of E. coli strains isolated from episodes of bovine mastitis.
Figure-1

Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction cluster analysis of fecal Escherichia coli isolates from chicken (Ch1, Ch2, and Ch3), ducks (D1 and D2), quails (Q1), turkey (T1 and T2), fancy birds (F1 and F2), and poultry farm workers (H1 and H2); standard E. coli MTCC 1610.

Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction cluster analysis of fecal Escherichia coli isolates from chicken (Ch1, Ch2, and Ch3), ducks (D1 and D2), quails (Q1), turkey (T1 and T2), fancy birds (F1 and F2), and poultry farm workers (H1 and H2); standard E. coli MTCC 1610. Several investigations have used ERIC-PCR as a highly sensitive genomic fingerprinting tool for detecting and determining different strains of E. coli from diverse sources [11,15,21]. Soltani et al. recognized 65 different avian E. coli strains from 95 samples with 232 to 2690 bp bands on gel electrophoresis and confirmed that ERIC-PCR as a good technique for bacterial genotyping among cheap and simple molecular tools [22]. In determining genetic profiles of E. coli, ERIC-PCR technique was showed to have more discriminatory power than 16S rRNA gene analysis [23]. In the present study, ERIC-PCR profile dendrogram analysis discriminated virulent E. coli isolates into three major clusters (C1 to C3) for 70% similarity cutoff, namely, C1 with four isolates (chicken, 2; fancy birds, 2), C2 with two isolates (chicken, 1; quail, 1), and C3 with five isolates (turkey, 2; duck, 2; and reference strain E. coli MTCC 1610) (Figure-1). The two human E. coli isolates were found to be unclustered (UC) with other isolates. Cluster analysis indicated wide intra-serotypic genetic diversity among the isolates affiliated to the same “O” serotype, as evidenced by their grouping under different clusters in the dendrogram. For example, isolates of O120 serotype, namely, Ch2 and Ch3 were grouped under clusters C1 and C2, respectively, with different ERIC-PCR genotypes (E2 and E3) (Table-2 and Figure-1). The numerical index of discrimination calculated for 12 isolates, using Simpson’s index of diversity was 0.997, which corroborate with earlier studies [15,21], where ERIC-PCR was shown to have highly significant discriminatory power in characterizing the genetic diversity of E. coli strains.

Conclusion

The results presented in this paper and past studies emphasize the utility of the combination of serotyping with PCR-based genotyping tools in the epidemiological investigations of virulent E. coli strains. This is the first study in India to elucidate the intra-serotypic genetic diversity of virulent E. coli isolates from different poultry species as well as poultry farm workers, and ERIC-PCR was proved to be quick, sharp, and cost-effective fingerprint method for effective discrimination of E. coli strains based on their genotype.

Authors’ Contributions

MSS and NMS prepared the study design and carried out the research under the supervision of TSR and MM. NMS collected the samples and executed the isolation. MSS and MM conducted the molecular part of the research. The manuscript was drafted and revised by MSS and NMS under the guidance of TSR and MM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  15 in total

1.  Genetic Diversity of Arcobacter Species of Animal and Human Origin in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Authors:  M Soma Sekhar; T Srinivasa Rao; B K Chinnam; K V Subramanyam; M Metta; N Mohammad Sharif
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by using multiplex PCR assays for stx1, stx2, eaeA, enterohemorrhagic E. coli hlyA, rfbO111, and rfbO157.

Authors:  A W Paton; J C Paton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Genetic variability of avian Escherichia coli strains evaluated by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus and repetitive extragenic palindromic polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A C Carvalho de Moura; K Irino; M C Vidotto
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

4.  Investigation of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in avian species in India.

Authors:  S A Wani; I Samanta; M A Bhat; Y Nishikawa
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.858

5.  Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds.

Authors:  Bidyut R Mohapatra; Klaas Broersma; Asit Mazumder
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Genetic diversity in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR technique in Sanandaj hospitals.

Authors:  Rashid Ramazanzadeh; Serveh Zamani; Saman Zamani
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2013-06

7.  Shiga (Vero)-toxin producing Escherichia coli isolated from the hospital foods; virulence factors, o-serogroups and antimicrobial resistance properties.

Authors:  Reza Ranjbar; Mojtaba Masoudimanesh; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Nematollah Jonaidi-Jafari; Ebrahim Rahimi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 4.887

8.  Molecular characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from ruminant and donkey raw milk samples and traditional dairy products in Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Momtaz; Rahil Farzan; Ebrahim Rahimi; Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi; Negar Souod
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-07-31

9.  Genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates from different sources in the North-West Province, South Africa, using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR analysis.

Authors:  Collins Njie Ateba; Moses Mbewe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Molecular typing of uropathogenic E. coli strains by the ERIC-PCR method.

Authors:  Maryam Afkhami Ardakani; Reza Ranjbar
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-04-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Pore-forming alpha-hemolysin efficiently improves the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of protein antigens.

Authors:  Jin-Tao Zou; Hai-Ming Jing; Yue Yuan; Lang-Huan Lei; Zhi-Fu Chen; Qiang Gou; Qing-Shan Xiong; Xiao-Li Zhang; Zhuo Zhao; Xiao-Kai Zhang; Hao Zeng; Quan-Ming Zou; Jin-Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 6.823

2.  The Prevalence of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Raw Chicken Meat Samples.

Authors:  Omid Zarei; Leili Shokoohizadeh; Hadi Hossainpour; Mohammad Yousef Alikhani
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin on biofilm formation and virulence factors of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Guofeng Dong; Jiahui Li; Lijiang Chen; Wenzi Bi; Xiaoxiao Zhang; Haiyang Liu; Xiaoyang Zhi; Tieli Zhou; Jianming Cao
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.257

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.