| Literature DB >> 24885670 |
Irma M Puspitasari, Rizky Abdulah, Chiho Yamazaki, Satomi Kameo, Takashi Nakano, Hiroshi Koyama1.
Abstract
To establish guidelines for the selenium supplementation in radiotherapy we assessed the benefits and risks of selenium supplementation in radiotherapy. Clinical studies on the use of selenium in radiotherapy were searched in the PubMed electronic database in January 2013. Sixteen clinical studies were identified among the 167 articles selected in the initial search. Ten articles were observational studies, and the other 6 articles reported studies on the effects of selenium supplementation in patients with cancer who underwent radiotherapy. The studies were conducted worldwide including European, American and Asian countries between 1987 and 2012. Plasma, serum or whole blood selenium levels were common parameters used to assess the effects of radiotherapy and the selenium supplementation status. Selenium supplementation improved the general conditions of the patients, improved their quality of life and reduced the side effects of radiotherapy. At the dose of selenium used in these studies (200-500 μg/day), selenium supplementation did not reduce the effectiveness of radiotherapy, and no toxicities were reported. Selenium supplementation may offer specific benefits for several types of cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. Because high-dose selenium and long-term supplementation may be unsafe due to selenium toxicity, more evidence-based information and additional research are needed to ensure the therapeutic benefits of selenium supplementation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24885670 PMCID: PMC4073179 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Figure 1Flowchart of the literature search.
Clinical studies on selenium and radiotherapy between 1987 and 2012
| 1 | Pothier et al. [ | USA | n = 71 | Observation of Se levels | Upper gastrointestinal cancer | Not mentioned |
| 2 | Antila et al. [ | Finland | n = 24 | Observation of Se levels | Breast cancer | Energy photons followed by 6–12 MeV electrons |
| 3 | Piccinini et al. [ | Italy | n = 66 | Observation of Se levels | Breast cancer (n = 38), lung cancer (n = 28) | Not mentioned |
| 4 | Rostkowska-Nadolska et al. [ | Poland | n = 78 | Observation of Se levels | carcinoma of the larynx | X-Ray therapy |
| 5 | Yadav et al. [ | India | n = 30 | Observation of Se levels | Head and neck cancer | Not mentioned |
| 6 | Last et al. [ | UK | n = 100 | Observation of Se levels | Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma | Not mentioned |
| 7 | Fraunholz et al. [ | Germany | n = 224 | Observation of Se levels | Breast cancer (n = 94); cervical csncer (n = 25); head and neck cancer (n = 23); lung cancer (n = 19); prostate (n = 13); other (n = 50) | 6-MV and/or 25-MV photons generated by a linear accelerator |
| 8 | Franca et al. [ | Brazil | n = 209 | Observation of Se levels | Breast cancer | Not mentioned |
| 9 | Zeng YC et al. [ | China | n = 95 | Observation of Se levels | Non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases | 6MV external beam radiotherapy |
| 10 | Eroglu C et al. [ | Turkey | n = 47 | Observation of Se levels | Head and neck cancer | Not mentioned |
| 11 | Pakdaman, [ | Germany | n = 32 | Se supplementation | Brain tumor | Not mentioned |
| 12 | Kiremidjian-Schumacher et al. [ | USA | n = 33 supplemented (n = 17) placebo (n = 16) | Se supplementation | Head and neck cancer | Not mentioned |
| 13 | Micke et al. [ | Germany | n = 48 | Se supplementation | Secondary lymphedema | a linear accelerator with 6-MeV photons or a 60Co treatment unit |
| 14 | Elango et al. [ | India | n = 126 | Se supplementation | Oral cancer | a tele-cobalt beam (Theratron-780-60Co; phoenix-60Co; Gammatron-60Co) |
| 15 | Muecke et al. [ | Germany | n = 81 supplemented (n = 39) control group (n = 42) | Se supplementation | Cervical cancer (n = 11); uterine cancer (n = 70) | 6- to 18-MV linear accelerator |
| 16 | Buntzel et al. [ | Germany | n = 39 | Se supplementation | Head and neck cancer | Not mentioned |
| Total = 1303 |
Observational studies investigating the selenium levels in patients who underwent radiotherapy without selenium supplementation
| 1 | Pothier et al. [ | Plasma | AAS | 61.8 (at stable stage) | 1 week (n = 5) | 34.3 | - | - | - |
| 2 | Antila et al. [ | Serum | AAS | 130.7* | Middle of therapy | 124.4* | 128.3* | 2 weeks | 126.7* |
| 2 months | 121.2* | ||||||||
| 3 | Piccinini et al. [ | Plasma | Fluorometric method | Breast cancer: 71.81 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Lung cancer:69.59 | |||||||||
| 4 | Rostkowska-Nadolska et al. [ | Serum | AAS | 253.8** | - | - | - | 6 weeks | 267.5** |
| 5 | Yadav et al. [ | Serum | AAS | 62.7 | - | - | 61.0 | 1 year | Cured:91.5 |
| Residual disease: 61.8 | |||||||||
| 6 | Last et al. [ | Serum | ICP-MS | 72.44* | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | Fraunholz et al. [ | Whole blood | AAS | 75.64 | - | - | 75.88 | 6 weeks | 81.28 |
| 8 | Franca et al. [ | Plasma | AAS | ≤60 years:101.8 | - | - | ≤60 years: 58.1↓ | - | - |
| >60 years:65.2 | >60 years: 33.7↓ | ||||||||
| 9 | Zeng YC et al. [ | Whole blood | AAS | 90.4 | - | - | 56.3↓ | - | -’ |
| 10 | Eroglu C et al. [ | Serum | ICP-MS | 58.09 | - | - | 56.34 | - | - |
| 12 | Kiremidjian-Schumacher et al. [ | Plasma (placebo group) | Graphite-furnace AAS | 94.38 | - | - | 8th weeks: 91.8 | 8 weeks | 89.92 |
| 15 | Muecke et al. [ | Whole blood (control group) | AAS | 63.2 | 50% of therapy | 67.3 | 61.4 | 6 weeks | 69 |
↓ = significant decrease.
*1 μmol/l = 1 μg/l x 0.0127 [33].
**1 ppm = 1,000 μg/l.
Selenium levels in patients who underwent radiotherapy with selenium supplementation
| 9 | Pakdaman, [ | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 63 | - | - | 120 | - | - |
| 12 | Kiremidjian-Schumacher et al. [ | Plasma | Graphite-furnace AAS | 91.29 | - | - | 8th weeks: 105.29 | 8 weeks (without supplemen-tation) | 88.73 |
| 15 | Muecke et al. [ | Whole blood | AAS | 65.3 | 50% of therapy | 93.2 | 90.9 | 6 weeks (without supplemen-tation) | 73.2 |
↑ = increase.
Selenium supplementation studies in patients who underwent radiotherapy
| 11 | Pakdaman, [ | Brain tumor | Not mentioned | Sodium selenite | 1000/day (4–8 weeks) | Infusion (during radiotherapy) | Mineral elements, Se and other blood parameters (AST, ALT, γ-GTP, ESR) | A significant diminution of symptoms of intracranial pressure was achieved in 76% of patients. |
| 12 | Kiremidjian-Schumacher et al. [ | Head and neck cancer | Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study | Sodium selenite | 200/day (8 weeks) | Oral (during radiotherapy) | Se in plasma, CTL, MLR, PHA | Significantly enhanced cell-mediated immune responsiveness |
| 13 | Micke et al. [ | Secondary Lymphedema | Not mentioned | Sodium selenite | 500/day (4–6 weeks) | Oral (4 or10 months after radiotherapy) | Foldi and Miller scoring and quality of life | Foldi and Miller score: more than 78% showed an improvement of one stage or more |
| 14 | Elango et al. [ | Oral cancer | Not mentioned | Sodium selenite | 400/day (6 months) | Oral (during radiotherapy) | Plasma Se, enzymatic (GPx and others) and non-enzymatic antioxidants | Supplementation increased the enzymatic and non enzymatic defense systems |
| 15 | Muecke et al. [ | Cervical cancer (n = 11); Uterin cancer (n = 70) | Multicenter, phase 3 trial | Sodium selenite | 500 or 300/day | Oral (during radiotherapy) | Whole blood Se | Statistically significant in reducing the number of episode and severity of RT-induced diarrhea |
| 16 | Buntzel et al. [ | Head and neck (n = 39) | Randomized phase II study | Sodium selenite | 500 or 300/day | Oral (during radiotherapy) | Side effect evaluation | Reduced the development of dysphagia due to radiotherapy |