Literature DB >> 12433704

Selenium supplementation and lung cancer incidence: an update of the nutritional prevention of cancer trial.

Mary E Reid1, Anna J Duffield-Lillico, Linda Garland, Bruce W Turnbull, Larry C Clark, James R Marshall.   

Abstract

Interest in the chemopreventive effects of the trace element selenium has spanned the past three decades. Of >100 studies that have investigated the effects of selenium in carcinogen-exposed animals, two-thirds have observed a reduction in tumor incidence and/or preneoplastic endpoints (G. F. Combs and S. B. Combs, The Role of Selenium in Nutrition Chapter 10, pp. 413-462. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1986, and B. H. Patterson and O. A. Levander, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 6: 63-69, 1997). The Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial, a randomized clinical trial reported by Clark et al. (L. C. Clark et al., JAMA, 276: 1957-1963, 1996), showed as a secondary end point, a statistically significant decrease in lung cancer incidence with selenium supplementation. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-1.01; P = 0.05]. These results were based on active follow-up of 1312 participants. This reanalysis used an extended Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial participant follow-up through the end of the blinded clinical trial on February 1, 1996. The additional 3 years added 8 cases to the selenium-treated group and 4 cases to the placebo group, and increased follow-up to 7.9 years. The relative risk of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.40-1.21; P = 0.18) is not statistically significant. Whereas the overall adjusted HR is not significant (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.44-1.24; P = 0.26), and the HR for current and former smokers was not significant, the trend is toward a reduction in risk of incident lung cancer with selenium supplementation. In a subgroup analysis there was a nominally significant HR among subjects with baseline plasma selenium in the lowest tertile (HR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.96; P = 0.04). The analysis for the middle and highest tertiles of baseline showed HRs of 0.91 and 1.25. The current reanalysis indicates that selenium supplementation did not significantly decrease lung cancer incidence in the full population, but a significant decrease among individuals with low baseline selenium concentrations was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  44 in total

Review 1.  Selenium for preventing cancer.

Authors:  Marco Vinceti; Gabriele Dennert; Catherine M Crespi; Marcel Zwahlen; Maree Brinkman; Maurice P A Zeegers; Markus Horneber; Roberto D'Amico; Cinzia Del Giovane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

2.  Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Mei Chung; Ethan M Balk; Stanley Ip; Gowri Raman; Winifred W Yu; Thomas A Trikalinos; Alice H Lichtenstein; Elizabeth A Yetley; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Down-regulation of 14-3-3 isoforms and annexin A5 proteins in lung adenocarcinoma induced by the tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNK in the A/J mouse revealed by proteomic analysis.

Authors:  James D Bortner; Arunangshu Das; Todd M Umstead; Williard M Freeman; Richard Somiari; Cesar Aliaga; David S Phelps; Karam El-Bayoumy
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Metallomics study using hair mineral analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis: relationship between cancer and minerals.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yasuda; Kazuya Yoshida; Mitsuru Segawa; Ryoichi Tokuda; Toyoharu Tsutsui; Yuichi Yasuda; Shunichi Magara
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  A prospective study of plasma Selenoprotein P and lung cancer risk among low-income adults.

Authors:  Meira Epplein; Raymond F Burk; Qiuyin Cai; Margaret K Hargreaves; William J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Major differences among chemopreventive organoselenocompounds in the sustained elevation of cytoprotective genes.

Authors:  Robyn L Poerschke; Michael R Franklin; Andrea H Bild; Philip J Moos
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.642

7.  Differential effects of selenium on benign and malignant prostate epithelial cells: stimulation of LNCaP cell growth by noncytotoxic, low selenite concentrations.

Authors:  Nur Ozten Kandaş; Carla Randolph; Maarten C Bosland
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 8.  Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Chromosome 5p Region SNPs Are Associated with Risk of NSCLC among Women.

Authors:  Alison L Van Dyke; Michele L Cote; Angela S Wenzlaff; Judith Abrams; Susan Land; Priyanka Iyer; Ann G Schwartz
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-18

Review 10.  Effects of antioxidant supplementation on the aging process.

Authors:  Domenico Fusco; Giuseppe Colloca; Maria Rita Lo Monaco; Matteo Cesari
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.