| Literature DB >> 24885133 |
Kento Tokuyama, Satoshi Ohno, Katsunori Yoshikawa, Takashi Hirasawa, Shotaro Tanaka, Chikara Furusawa, Hiroshi Shimizu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3HP) is an important chemical precursor for the production of bioplastics. Microbial production of 3HP from glycerol has previously been developed through the optimization of culture conditions and the 3HP biosynthesis pathway. In this study, a novel strategy for improving 3HP production in Escherichia coli was investigated by the modification of central metabolism based on a genome-scale metabolic model and experimental validation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24885133 PMCID: PMC4019354 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-64
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1Culture results of the 3HP-producing strains. The culture results of the strains TK52 (A, B), TK52z (C, D), TK52t (E, F), TK52tz (G, H), and TK52tzy (I, J) are shown. Open diamond, 3HP; closed square, glycerol; open triangle, 1,3-PDO; closed circle, OD600; open circle, acetate; open square, succinate; closed triangle, lactate; closed diamond, methylglyoxal. Error bars represent standard deviation of triplicate experiments in TK52 and TK52z strains, and of nine replicate experiments in other strains. Some of the error bars are smaller than the symbols.
Summary of the experimental results
| Specific growth rate (1/h)*1 | 0.73 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.00 | 1st: 0.55 ± 0.01 | 1st: 0.54 ± 0.01 | 1st: 0.56 ± 0.01 | | |
| 2nd: 0.03 ± 0.01 | 2nd: 0.03 ± 0.00 | 2nd: 0.04 ± 0.01 | |||||
| Maximum 3HP production rate (mmol/(g DC●h))*2 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.14 | 0.27 ± 0.11 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | | |
| Consumed glycerol (mM)*3 | 192.7 ± 5.0 | 193.2 ± 2.4 | 168.2 ± 24.4 | 119.0 ± 44.6 | 117.6 ± 3.9 | | |
| Biomass (C-mol%)*3 | 37.0 ± 3.5 | 36.1 ± 1.4 | 19.6 ± 3.2 | 21.7 ± 11.0 | 20.8 ± 1.2 | 47.7 | 22.8 |
| | (5.2 ± 0.5) | (5.1 ± 0.2) | (2.4 ± 0.6) | (1.6 ± 0.3) | (1.8 ± 0.1) | | |
| 3HP (C-mol%)*3 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 14.7 ± 7.0 | 20.1 ± 9.2 | 33.9 ± 1.2 | 0 | 70.5 |
| | (8.9 ± 1.3) | (11.1 ± 1.0) | (24.3 ± 11.7) | (21.2 ± 7.7) | (39.9 ± 2.4) | | |
| 1,3-PDO (C-mol%)*3 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 22.9 ± 5.2 | 37.7 ± 13.2 | 5.9 ± 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| | (1.5 ± 0.8) | (1.3 ± 0.3) | (38.1 ± 9.4) | (40.5 ± 14.0) | (7.0 ± 0.7) | | |
| Succinate (C-mol%)*3 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | (1.3 ± 0.2) | (1.9 ± 0.2) | (0.4 ± 0.3) | (0) | (0) | | |
| Acetate (C-mol%)*3 | 9.9 ± 1.8 | 12.9 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 9.9 | 2.2 ± 4.1 | 6.6 ± 1.9 | 27.4 | 0 |
| | (28.7 ± 5.4) | (37.3 ± 1.1) | (20.5 ± 24.3) | (5.1 ± 9.6) | (11.6 ± 3.0) | | |
| Maximum methylglyoxal concentration (mM) | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.02 |
*1Specific growth rates were calculated using OD600 at 0–6 h for the TK52 and TK52z strains. For the TK52t, TK52tz and TK52tzy strains, specific growth rates during the 1st and 2nd growth phases were calculated using the OD600 at 0–6 h and 48–72 h, respectively.
*2Maximum 3HP production rates were calculated from the data at 24–48 h for the TK52 and TK52z strains, and at 48–72 h for other strains.
*3C-mol% was calculated from the carbon-mol of the product per carbon-mol of the consumed glycerol. The values in the parentheses indicate the final concentrations of biomass (g/L) and products (mM). Standard deviations were obtained from triplicate experiments in the TK52 and TK52z strains, and from 9 replicate experiments in other strains. For calculation of biomass yield, OD600 was converted into dry cell weight using the conversion factor 0.37 g DC/L, and carbon-mol in the biomass was calculated based on the biomass composition described in the iAF1260 model [21].
*4Metabolic simulation was performed with following parameters: GUR was 15 mmol/(g DC●h) and OUR was 10 mmol/(g DC●h).
The metabolic reactions added to the iAF1260 model
| Glycerol dehydratase | Glycerol → 3HPA + H2O | 4.2.1.30 |
| 3HPA dehydrogenase | 3HPA + NAD+ + H2O → 3HP + NADH + 2H+ | 1.2.1.3 |
| 3HP transporter | 3HP + H+ + → 3HP[e] + H+[e] | – |
| 3HP exchange | 3HP[e] → | – |
| 1,3-PDO oxidoreductase | 3HPA + NADPH + H+ → 1,3PDO + NADP+ | 1.1.1.202 |
| 1,3-PDO transporter | 1,3-PDO → 1,3-PDO[e] | – |
| 1,3-PDO exchange | 1,3-PDO[e] → | – |
Metabolites with “[e]” indicate extracellular metabolites.
Knockout candidate genes for enhancing 3HP production obtained by gene knockout simulation
| iAF1260-3HP | 0 | 100% |
| Δ | 70.5 | 48% |
| Δ | 70.5 | 48% |
| Δ | 70.5 | 48% |
| Δ | 69.0 | 47% |
| Δ | 69.0 | 47% |
Figure 2Metabolic flux distributions based on the genome-scale metabolic model. Metabolic flux distribution for the iAF1260-3HP (A), Δzwf(B), ΔtpiA(C), and ΔtpiA Δzwf(D) models are shown. Flux values are normalized by the glycerol uptake rate to 100%. Width of the black arrow corresponds to the relative flux value of glycerol uptake rate. Gray arrow indicates the flux of the corresponding reaction was 0. Abbreviations: 3HP, 3-hydroxypropionic acid; 3HPA, 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde; 1,3-PDO, 1,3-propanediol; DHA, dihydroxyacetone; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; G3P, glycerol 3-phosphate; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; 6PG, 6-phospho-gluconate; 6PGL, 6-phospho-glucono-1,5-lactone; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; FBP, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; Ru5P, ribulose 5-phosphate; R5P, ribose 5-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose 7-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; X5P, xylulose 5-phosphate; E4P, erythrose4-phosphate; MGO, methylglyoxal; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr, pyruvate; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA; AcetP, acetyl phosphate; EtOH, ethanol; Oxa, oxaloacetate; Cit, citrate; IsoCit, isocitrate; α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; Suc, succinate; Fum, fumarate; Mal, malate; Glyox, glyoxylate; Q, ubiquinone; QH2, ubiquinol.
The strains used in this study
| BW25113 | F−, λ−, | Datsenko and Wanner [ |
| JW3890 | The same as BW25113 but Δ | Baba |
| BW25113 Δ | The same as BW25113 but Δ | Nakahigashi |
| BW25113 Δ | The same as BW25113 but Δ | This study |
| MG1655(DE3) | F−, λ−, | This study |
| TK52 | MG1655(DE3) transformed with pTrc99A/ | This study |
| TK52t | The same as TK52 but Δ | This study |
| TK52z | The same as TK52 but Δ | This study |
| TK52tz | The same as TK52 but Δ | This study |
| TK52tzy | The same as TK52 but Δ | This study |