| Literature DB >> 26640947 |
Katsunori Yoshikawa1,2, Shimpei Aikawa2,3, Yuta Kojima1,2, Yoshihiro Toya1, Chikara Furusawa1,2,4, Akihiko Kondo2,3, Hiroshi Shimizu1,2.
Abstract
Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis is a promising feedstock and host strain for bioproduction because of its high accumulation of glycogen and superior characteristics for industrial production. Metabolic simulation using a genome-scale metabolic model and flux balance analysis is a powerful method that can be used to design metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of target molecule production. In this study, we constructed a genome-scale metabolic model of A. platensis NIES-39 including 746 metabolic reactions and 673 metabolites, and developed novel strategies to improve the production of valuable metabolites, such as glycogen and ethanol. The simulation results obtained using the metabolic model showed high consistency with experimental results for growth rates under several trophic conditions and growth capabilities on various organic substrates. The metabolic model was further applied to design a metabolic network to improve the autotrophic production of glycogen and ethanol. Decreased flux of reactions related to the TCA cycle and phosphoenolpyruvate reaction were found to improve glycogen production. Furthermore, in silico knockout simulation indicated that deletion of genes related to the respiratory chain, such as NAD(P)H dehydrogenase and cytochrome-c oxidase, could enhance ethanol production by using ammonium as a nitrogen source.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26640947 PMCID: PMC4671677 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the reconstructed metabolic model of A. platensis NIES-39.
The number of unique metabolites was calculated by considering the metabolites present in more than one compartment as a single metabolite.
| Features | Number | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Genome size (bp) | 6,788,435 | |
| No. of open reading frames (ORFs) | 6,631 | |
| No. of annotated genes | 2,542 | |
|
| ||
| Metabolites | 673 | |
| Reactions | 746 | |
| Annotated reactions | 644 | |
| Transport reactions | 60 | |
| Exchange reactions | 34 | |
| No. of ORFs including in the model | 620 | |
| ORF coverage | 9% | |
Comparison of the growth capabilities on the various organic substrates.
| Substrate | Experimental [ | Simulation |
|---|---|---|
| Glucose | + | + |
| Maltose | + | + |
| Sucrose | + | + |
| Maltotriose | + | + |
| Pyruvate | + | + |
| Lactate | + | + |
| Citrate | + | + |
| α-Ketoglutarate | − | + |
| Succinate | − | + |
| Fumarate | − | + |
| Malate | + | + |
| Oxaloacetate | + | + |
| Glutamate | + | + |
| Aspartate | + | + |
+ and − indicate growth or non-growth on the corresponding substrate, respectively, under heterotrophic conditions.
Fig 1Effect of nitrate uptake rate on growth and glycogen production.
The specific growth rate (solid line) and glycogen production rate (dashed line) at each nitrate uptake rate are shown. The dotted line indicates the optimal uptake rate for biomass production. The grey area represents the solution space of the glycogen production rate calculated by flux variability analysis [38], as the glycogen production rate was undetermined.
Fig 2Culture profile under nitrogen depletion conditions.
Growth and intracellular glycogen (A) together with the concentrations of organic acids in the culture medium (B) were summarized. Closed circle, OD750; open circle, glycogen content; square, acetate; diamond, lactate; triangle, pyruvate. Error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate experiments.
Fig 3Flux response analysis for glycogen production.
The simulated metabolic flux distribution under autotrophic conditions is shown (A). The values indicate the metabolic flux of each reaction. The flux was normalized to that of the reaction catalyzed by ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Bold and dashed-bold arrows indicate the reactions whose activation or repression increased glycogen production, respectively, identified by flux response analysis. The reactions “DHAP + E4P ↔ S7P”, “DHAP + G3P ↔ F6P” and “G3P + S7P ↔ E4P + F6P” were undetermined, and the flux range of these reactions was calculated by flux variability analysis [38]. FRA results of the phosphoglucomutase reaction (G6P → G1P) (B) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase reaction (PEP → Oxa) (C) are shown. The X-axis indicates the flux of the corresponding reaction and the Y-axis indicates the glycogen production rate excluding the flux for biomass production, as glycogen is a component of the biomass. The dotted line indicates the optimal flux of the corresponding reaction. The grey area in Fig 3(C) represents the solution space calculated by flux variability analysis. 2PG, glycerate-2-phosphate; 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; 6PGC, 6-phospho-gluconate; 6PGL, 6-phospho-glucono-1,5-lactone; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA; αKG, α-ketoglutarate; Cit, citrate; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; Fum, fumarate; G1P, glucose-1-phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; Icit, isocitrate; Mal, malate; Oxa, oxalate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr, pyruvate; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; RuBP, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; Suc, succinate; Sucsal, succinyl semialdehyde; Xu5P, xylulose-5-phosphate.
In silico knockout simulation for ethanol production with nitrate as nitrogen source.
Detailed information is summarized in S4 Table.
| Relative growth rate to wild type model. | Ethanol yield (C-mol%) | Knockout targets |
|---|---|---|
| 96% | 2% | NADH dehydrogenase |
| NADPH dehydrogenase | ||
| L-Valine:pyruvate aminotransferase | ||
| Malic enzyme | ||
| 97% | 1% | NADH dehydrogenase |
| NADPH dehydrogenase | ||
| L-Valine:pyruvate aminotransferase | ||
| Malate dehydrogenase |
In silico knockout simulation for ethanol production with ammonium as nitrogen source.
Detailed information is summarized in S4 Table.
| Relative growth rate to wild type model. | Ethanol yield (C-mol%) | Knockout targets |
|---|---|---|
| 18% | 55% | NADH dehydrogenase |
| NADPH dehydrogenase | ||
| Cytochrome-c oxidase | ||
| Phosphoglycerate mutase | ||
| 18% | 55% | NADH dehydrogenase |
| NADPH dehydrogenase | ||
| Cytochrome-c oxidase | ||
| Enolase | ||
| 20% | 54% | NADH dehydrogenase |
| NADPH dehydrogenase | ||
| Cytochrome-c oxidase | ||
| Phosphoenolpyruvate synthase | ||
| 37% | 43% | NADH dehydrogenase |
| NADPH dehydrogenase | ||
| Cytochrome-c oxidase |