| Literature DB >> 24883325 |
Danish Iqbal1, M Salman Khan1, Amir Khan2, Mohd Sajid Khan1, Saheem Ahmad1, Ashwani K Srivastava1, Paramdeep Bagga3.
Abstract
Hypercholesterolemia-induced oxidative stress has been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, which is one of the major causes of mortality worldwide. The current work, for the first time, accounts the antioxidant, genoprotective, antilipoperoxidative, and HMG-CoA reductase (EC 1.1.1.34) inhibitory properties of traditional medicinal plant, Ficus palmata Forsk. Our result showed that among sequentially extracted fractions of Ficus palmata Forsk, FPBA (F. palmata bark aqueous extract) and FPLM (F. palmata leaves methanolic extract) extracts have higher phenolic content and also exhibited significantly more radical scavenging (DPPH and Superoxide) and antioxidant (FRAP) capacity. Moreover, FPBA extract also exhibited significantly higher inhibition of lipid peroxidation assay. Additionally, results showed almost complete and partial protection of oxidatively damaged DNA by these plant extracts when compared to mannitol. Furthermore, our results showed that FPBA extract (IC50 = 9.1 ± 0.61 µg/mL) exhibited noteworthy inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase activity as compared to other extracts, which might suggest its role as cardioprotective agent. In conclusion, results showed that FPBA extract not only possess significant antioxidant and genoprotective property but also is able to attenuate the enzymatic activity of HMG-CoA reductase, which might suggest its role in combating various oxidative stress-related diseases, including atherosclerosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24883325 PMCID: PMC4032710 DOI: 10.1155/2014/762620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Phytochemical screening of FPL and FPB extracts.
| Plant extracts | Flavonoid | Tannins | Terpenoids | Phenols | Proteins | Carbohydrate | Saponins | Reducing sugar | Glycosides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPLH | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| FPLD | + | ++ | + | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| FPLE | + | − | − | ++ | + | + | + | + | + |
| FPLM | ++ | + | + | +++ | + | + | + | ++ | + |
| FPLA | + | − | − | + | + | + | ++ | + | + |
| FPBH | + | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| FPBD | + | + | ++ | ++ | − | − | − | − | − |
| FPBE | − | − | ++ | + | + | − | − | − | − |
| FPBM | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | ++ | − |
| FPBA | ++ | + | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Figure 1Total phenolic content of FPL and FPB extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2(a) DPPH free radical scavenging activity of different FPL extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Nonsignificant (ns), significantly different *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus 0 μg/mL. (b) DPPH free radical scavenging activity of different FPB extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Nonsignificant (ns), significantly different *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus 0 μg/mL. (c) Ferric reducing antioxidant power of different plant extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). (d) Percent inhibition of superoxide free radicals by different FPL extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). FPLH, FPLD, and FPLE are significantly different; P < 0.05 compared to control (0 μg/mL); FPLM, FPLA, and ascorbic acid are significantly different; P < 0.01 versus 0 μg/mL. (e) Percent inhibition of superoxide free radicals by different FPB extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). FPBH, FPBD, and FPBE are significantly different; P < 0.05 compared to control (0 μg/mL); FPBM, FPBA, and ascorbic acid are significantly different; P < 0.01 versus 0 μg/mL. (f) Percent inhibition of lipid peroxidation by FPL extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). FPLM, FPLA, and quercetin are significantly different; P < 0.05 compared to control (0 μg/mL); FPLH, FPLD, and FPLE are significantly different; P < 0.01 versus 0 μg/mL. (g) Percent inhibition of lipid peroxidation by FPB extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). FPBH and FPBE are significantly different; P < 0.05 compared to control (0 μg/mL); FPBM, FPBA, FPBD, and quercetin are significantly different; P < 0.01 versus 0 μg/mL. (h) Effects of various Ficus virens extracts on supercoiled pUC18 plasmid DNA (100 ng) damage caused by OH• radicals. L1: pUC18 DNA + PBS (20 μL), L2: pUC18 DNA + Fenton's reagent (10 μL) + PBS (10 μL), Lanes 3–5: pUC18 DNA + Fenton's reagent (10 μL) + FPBA (50, 100, 250 μg/10 μL), Lanes 6–8: pUC18 DNA + Fenton's reagent (10 μL) + FPLM (50, 100, 250 μg/10 μL), and Lane 9: pUC18 DNA + Fenton's reagent (10 μL) + mannitol (250 μg/10 μL).
Correlation coefficient (r 2) values between various antioxidant methods and total phenolic content of FPBA extract.
| Assay | Correlation coefficient ( |
|---|---|
| TPC-DPPH | 0.842 |
| TPC-superoxide | 0.988 |
| TPC-lipid peroxidation | 0.939 |
| TPC-HMG-CoA reductase | 0.803 |
IC50 value of different extracts of FPL and FPB against HMG-CoA reductase enzyme activity.
| Plant extracts | IC50 value (µg/mL) |
|---|---|
| FPLH | 38 ± 2.15* |
| FPLD | 58 ± 3.15* |
| FPLE | 27 ± 1.15** |
| FPLM | 65 ± 3.24* |
| FPLA | NS |
| FPBH | NS |
| FPBD | 30 ± 1.44** |
| FPBE | 35 ± 1.64* |
| FPBM | 45 ± 2.45* |
| FPBA | 9.1 ± 0.53** |
| Pravastatin | 70.25** nM |
The values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Nonsignificant (NS), significantly different *P < 0.005, and **P < 0.001 versus without inhibitor.
Figure 3In vitro HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity of FPL and FPB extracts. Each value in the figure is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). FPLH, FPLD, FPBE, FPBA and FPBH are significantly different; P < 0.05 compared to control (0 µg/mL); FPBM, FPLM, FPLA, FPBD, and FPLE are significantly different; P < 0.01 versus 0 µg/mL
Figure 4((a) and (b)) LC-MS/MS analysis of FPBA extract.