OBJECTIVE: During the past decades, increasing efforts have been invested in studies to unravel the influence of genetic factors on antipsychotic (AP) dosage, treatment response, and occurrence of adverse effects. These studies aimed to improve clinical care by predicting outcome of treatment with APs and thus allowing for individualized treatment strategies. We highlight most important findings obtained through both candidate gene and genome-wide association studies, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors. METHODS: We reviewed studies on pharmacogenetics of AP response and adverse effects published on PubMed until early 2012. Owing to the high number of published studies, we focused our review on findings that have been replicated in independent studies or are supported by meta-analyses. RESULTS: Most robust findings were reported for associations between polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 system, the dopamine and the serotonin transmitter systems, and dosage, treatment response, and adverse effects, such as AP-induced weight gain or tardive dyskinesia. These associations were either detected for specific medications or for classes of APs. CONCLUSION: First promising and robust results show that pharmacogenetics bear promise for a widespread use in future clinical practice. This will likely be achieved by developing algorithms that will include many genetic variants. However, further investigation is warranted to replicate and validate previous findings, as well as to identify new genetic variants involved in AP response and for replication of existing findings.
OBJECTIVE: During the past decades, increasing efforts have been invested in studies to unravel the influence of genetic factors on antipsychotic (AP) dosage, treatment response, and occurrence of adverse effects. These studies aimed to improve clinical care by predicting outcome of treatment with APs and thus allowing for individualized treatment strategies. We highlight most important findings obtained through both candidate gene and genome-wide association studies, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors. METHODS: We reviewed studies on pharmacogenetics of AP response and adverse effects published on PubMed until early 2012. Owing to the high number of published studies, we focused our review on findings that have been replicated in independent studies or are supported by meta-analyses. RESULTS: Most robust findings were reported for associations between polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 system, the dopamine and the serotonin transmitter systems, and dosage, treatment response, and adverse effects, such as AP-induced weight gain or tardive dyskinesia. These associations were either detected for specific medications or for classes of APs. CONCLUSION: First promising and robust results show that pharmacogenetics bear promise for a widespread use in future clinical practice. This will likely be achieved by developing algorithms that will include many genetic variants. However, further investigation is warranted to replicate and validate previous findings, as well as to identify new genetic variants involved in AP response and for replication of existing findings.
Authors: M J Arranz; J Munro; J Birkett; A Bolonna; D Mancama; M Sodhi; K P Lesch; J F Meyer; P Sham; D A Collier; R M Murray; R W Kerwin Journal: Lancet Date: 2000-05-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Eva Janina Brandl; Daniel J Müller; Andres H Neuhaus; Arun K Tiwari; Thomas Sander; Michael Dettling Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: D B Allison; J L Mentore; M Heo; L P Chandler; J C Cappelleri; M C Infante; P J Weiden Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: N I Chowdhury; A K Tiwari; R P Souza; C C Zai; S A Shaikh; S Chen; F Liu; J A Lieberman; H Y Meltzer; A K Malhotra; J L Kennedy; D J Müller Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: V S Basile; V Ozdemir; M Masellis; M L Walker; H Y Meltzer; J A Lieberman; S G Potkin; G Alva; W Kalow; F M Macciardi; J L Kennedy Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Anil K Malhotra; Christoph U Correll; Nabilah I Chowdhury; Daniel J Müller; Peter K Gregersen; Annette T Lee; Arun K Tiwari; John M Kane; W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Rene S Kahn; Roel A Ophoff; Herbert Y Meltzer; Todd Lencz; James L Kennedy Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-09
Authors: D K Hall-Flavin; J G Winner; J D Allen; J J Jordan; R S Nesheim; K A Snyder; M S Drews; L L Eisterhold; J M Biernacka; D A Mrazek Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Arthur T Koga; John Strauss; Clement Zai; Gary Remington; Vincenzo De Luca Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: J K Hicks; J R Bishop; K Sangkuhl; D J Müller; Y Ji; S G Leckband; J S Leeder; R L Graham; D L Chiulli; A LLerena; T C Skaar; S A Scott; J C Stingl; T E Klein; K E Caudle; A Gaedigk Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Eva J Brandl; Nabilah I Chowdhury; Arun K Tiwari; Tristram A P Lett; Herbert Y Meltzer; James L Kennedy; Daniel J Müller Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: S Kanji; T M Fonseka; V S Marshe; V Sriretnakumar; M K Hahn; D J Müller Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: D J Müller; E J Brandl; F Degenhardt; K Domschke; H Grabe; O Gruber; J Hebebrand; W Maier; A Menke; M Riemenschneider; M Rietschel; D Rujescu; T G Schulze; L Tebartz van Elst; O Tüscher; J Deckert Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.214