Literature DB >> 24880821

Providing prescheduled appointments as a strategy for improving follow-up compliance after community-based glaucoma screening: results from an urban underserved population.

Tavé van Zyl1, Zhuo Su, Elaine Zhou, Ryan K Wong, Amir Mohsenin, Spencer Rogers, James C Tsai, Susan H Forster.   

Abstract

To determine if receiving a prescheduled appointment is associated with an increased likelihood of complying with follow-up eye care among individuals identified as at risk for glaucoma during community-based glaucoma screening in an urban underserved population. This study sampled 362 individuals aged ≥30 years without known glaucoma from low-income, predominantly black/Hispanic neighborhoods in New Haven, Connecticut presenting to one of twelve community-based glaucoma screening events from May 2010 to October 2012. A quasi-experimental design systematically assigned 63 individuals identified as at risk for glaucoma into either intervention or control group with a 1:2 ratio. Individuals in the control group (n = 41) received counseling on glaucoma and a recommendation for obtaining a follow-up appointment at the eye department of a local community health center, which offers affordable health services with income-adjusted fee discounts to uninsured, low-income patients. Those in the intervention group (n = 22) received the same counseling and a prescheduled appointment at the community health center. The overall rate of follow-up compliance within 3 months of screening was 30 % (41 % in the intervention group; 24 % in the control group). Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for sex, age, ethnicity, health insurance status, car access, living situation, and smoking status found that follow-up compliance was significantly associated with intervention (adjusted odds ratio 4.8; 95 % confidence interval 1.1-20.9). Providing prescheduled appointments can improve follow-up compliance after community-based glaucoma screening. This finding may be potentially applicable to community-based health screening for other preventable diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24880821     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-014-9890-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  15 in total

1.  Effect of treatment on the rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study observation group.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Barriers to follow-up eye care after preschool vision screening in the primary care setting: findings from a pilot study.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Rebecca L Uren; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; J Katz; K Singh; H A Quigley; J D Gottsch; J Javitt; A Sommer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The impact of change in visual field on health-related quality of life the los angeles latino eye study.

Authors:  Cecilia M Patino; Rohit Varma; Stanley P Azen; David V Conti; Michael B Nichol; Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Factors associated with failure to follow up after glaucoma screening: a study in an African American population.

Authors:  Jane A Gwira; Setareh Vistamehr; Heather Shelsta; Kent Bashford; Susan Forster; Phillip Palmisano; George Shafranov; M Bruce Shields
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  What is the best way to schedule patient follow-up appointments?

Authors:  Patrick J Saine; Suzanne M Baker
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2003-06

7.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Assessment of the Student Sight Savers Program methods for glaucoma screening.

Authors:  Sarwat Salim; Peter A Netland; Kenneth H Fung; Mary E Smith; Amanda Aldridge
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.648

Review 9.  Glaucoma screening: current trends, economic issues, technology, and challenges.

Authors:  Constance Nduaguba; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Knowledge about glaucoma and barriers to follow-up care in a community glaucoma screening program.

Authors:  Undraa Altangerel; Hema S Nallamshetty; Tara Uhler; Joann Fontanarosa; William C Steinmann; Juliana M Almodin; Brian H Chen; Jeffrey D Henderer
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.882

View more
  3 in total

1.  Facilitators and Barriers to Glaucoma Screening Identified by Key Stakeholders in Underserved Communities: A Community-engaged Research Approach.

Authors:  Dena Ballouz; Juno Cho; Maria A Woodward; Angela R Elam; David C Musch; Jason Zhang; Sayoko E Moroi; Leroy Johnson; Jean Cederna; Paula A Newman-Casey
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Follow-Up in a Glaucoma Screening Program.

Authors:  Patrick C Staropoli; Richard K Lee; Zachary A Kroger; Karina Somohano; Matthew Feldman; Jennifer D Verriotto; Adam Aldahan; Potyra R Rosa; William J Feuer; D Diane Zheng; David J Lee; Byron L Lam
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-29

3.  A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherence.

Authors:  Lisa A Hark; Deiana M Johnson; Giuliana Berardi; Neal S Patel; Lichuan Zeng; Yang Dai; Eileen L Mayro; Michael Waisbourd; L Jay Katz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.711

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.