Literature DB >> 33273279

Facilitators and Barriers to Glaucoma Screening Identified by Key Stakeholders in Underserved Communities: A Community-engaged Research Approach.

Dena Ballouz1, Juno Cho1, Maria A Woodward1,2, Angela R Elam1, David C Musch1,2,3, Jason Zhang1, Sayoko E Moroi4, Leroy Johnson5, Jean Cederna6, Paula A Newman-Casey1,2.   

Abstract

PRCIS: Community-engaged research (CER) enables researchers to identify community-specific barriers and facilitators to program implementation. Broadly applicable barriers to glaucoma care, such as Cost, Transportation, and Trust, and community-specific barriers, such as Language and Convenience/Access, were identified.
PURPOSE: The aim was to identify the facilitators and barriers to implementing glaucoma screening programs in 2 community clinics.
METHODS: A concurrent mixed-methods process analysis using CER. Key stakeholders-including patients, providers, and staff members-from 2 community clinics were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Interviews had 2 parts: (1) asking patients about community-based facilitators and barriers to implementing glaucoma screening and care and (2) eliciting feedback about a personalized coaching program. The transcripts were coded using Grounded Theory. Number of participants and number of representative citations were counted per theme. The qualitative analysis was coded using Dedoose 8.3.17 (Los Angeles, CA).
RESULTS: Thematic saturation was reached after coding 12 interviews. 30 participants were interviewed, 13 from Hamilton Clinic (Flint, MI; 8 patients, 5 providers and staff members) and 17 from Hope Clinic (Ypsilanti, MI; 6 patients, 11 providers and staff members). The most commonly cited themes were: Priorities (98 citations, 30 participants), Knowledge (73, 26) Transportation (63, 26), Cost (60, 23), and Convenience/Access (63, 22). Broadly applicable barriers to glaucoma care, such as Cost, Transportation, and Trust were identified alongside community-specific barriers such as Language and Convenience/Access. Participants rated their likelihood to follow up with an ophthalmologist after participating in the personalized coaching program at a mean of 8.83 (on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most confident).
CONCLUSIONS: CER enables researchers to identify community-specific barriers and facilitators, allowing more effective program implementation.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33273279      PMCID: PMC8084870          DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.290


  40 in total

1.  Trust in primary care providers and antiretroviral adherence in an urban HIV clinic.

Authors:  Oni J Blackstock; Dianne N Addison; Jennifer S Brennan; Oladipo A Alao
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis.

Authors:  A L Chapman; M Hadfield; C J Chapman
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb       Date:  2015

3.  Racial differences in trust in health care providers.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Katrina Armstrong; Oscar H Gandy; Lee Shaker
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-24

4.  The geographic distribution of eye care providers in the United States: Implications for a national strategy to improve vision health.

Authors:  Diane M Gibson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Henny J M Beckers; Carroll A B Webers; Michiel J W M Busch; Hendrik M A Brink; Thomas P Colen; Jan S A G Schouten
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Alan L Robin; Taylor Blachley; Karen Farris; Michele Heisler; Ken Resnicow; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Johan Y Y Ng; Nikos Ntoumanis; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Edward L Deci; Richard M Ryan; Joan L Duda; Geoffrey C Williams
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-07

9.  Prevalence of Glaucoma in the United States: The 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Priya Gupta; Di Zhao; Eliseo Guallar; Fang Ko; Michael V Boland; David S Friedman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Barriers to Attending Eye Appointments among Underserved Adults.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Weixia Guo; Jean Cederna; Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more
  4 in total

1.  Integration of stakeholder engagement from development to dissemination in genomic medicine research: Approaches and outcomes from the CSER Consortium.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Sara Ackerman; Lauren R Desrosiers; Shannon Rego; Sara J Knight; Lonna Mollison; Grace Byfield; Katherine P Anderson; Maria I Danila; Carol R Horowitz; Galen Joseph; Grace Lamoure; Nangel M Lindberg; Carmit K McMullen; Kathleen F Mittendorf; Michelle A Ramos; Mimsie Robinson; Catherine Sillari; Ebony B Madden
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 8.864

Review 2.  Addressing Social Determinants of Vision Health.

Authors:  Andrew M Williams; José-Alain Sahel
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Assessing Eye Health and Eye Care Needs Among North American Native Individuals.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; Kathleen Hughes; Dena Ballouz; Richard A Hirth; Josh Errickson; Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Effective Low-Cost Ophthalmological Screening With a Novel iPhone Fundus Camera at Community Centers.

Authors:  Du Cheng; Rachel Babij; Daniel Cabrera; Melissa Yuan; Alexander Port; Anna Sophia Mckenney; Jeff Zhu; Sarah Van Tassel; Julianne Imperato-McGinley; Grace Sun
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.