Literature DB >> 24877842

Assessment of individual organ doses in a realistic human phantom from neutron and gamma stimulated spectroscopy of the breast and liver.

Matthew D Belley1, William Paul Segars2, Anuj J Kapadia2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Understanding the radiation dose to a patient is essential when considering the use of an ionizing diagnostic imaging test for clinical diagnosis and screening. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors estimated the three-dimensional organ-dose distribution from neutron and gamma irradiation of the male liver, female liver, and female breasts for neutron- and gamma-stimulated spectroscopic imaging.
METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were developed using the Geant4 GATE application and a voxelized XCAT human phantom. A male and a female whole body XCAT phantom was voxelized into 256 × 256 × 600 voxels (3.125 × 3.125 × 3.125 mm(3)). A monoenergetic rectangular beam of 5.0 MeV neutrons or 7.0 MeV photons was made incident on a 2 cm thick slice of the phantom. The beam was rotated at eight different angles around the phantom ranging from 0° to 180°. Absorbed dose was calculated for each individual organ in the body and dose volume histograms were computed to analyze the absolute and relative doses in each organ.
RESULTS: The neutron irradiations of the liver showed the highest organ dose absorption in the liver, with appreciably lower doses in other proximal organs. The dose distribution within the irradiated slice exhibited substantial attenuation with increasing depth along the beam path, attenuating to ~15% of the maximum value at the beam exit side. The gamma irradiation of the liver imparted the highest organ dose to the stomach wall. The dose distribution from the gammas showed a region of dose buildup at the beam entrance, followed by a relatively uniform dose distribution to all of the deep tissue structures, attenuating to ~75% of the maximum value at the beam exit side. For the breast scans, both the neutron and gamma irradiation registered maximum organ doses in the breasts, with all other organs receiving less than 1% of the breast dose. Effective doses ranged from 0.22 to 0.37 mSv for the neutron scans and 41 to 66 mSv for the gamma scans.
CONCLUSIONS: Neutron and gamma irradiation of a primary target organ was found to impart the majority of the total dose to the primary target organ (and other large organs) within the beam plane and considerably lower dose to proximal organs outside of the beam. These results also indicate that despite the use of a highly scattering particle such as a neutron, the dose from neutron stimulated emission computed tomography scans is on par with other clinical imaging techniques such as x-ray computed tomography (x-ray CT). Given the high nonuniformity in the dose across an organ during the neutron scan, care must be taken when computing average doses from neutron irradiations. The effective doses from neutron scanning were found to be comparable to x-ray CT. Further technique modifications are needed to reduce the effective dose levels from the gamma scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24877842      PMCID: PMC4032437          DOI: 10.1118/1.4873684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  23 in total

Review 1.  The case for early detection.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Martin McIntosh; Stephen Schwartz; Brian Reid; Jerald Radich; Garnet Anderson; Leland Hartwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Adaptation and applications of a realistic digital phantom based on patient lung tumor trajectories.

Authors:  Pankaj Mishra; Sara St James; W Paul Segars; Ross I Berbeco; John H Lewis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Molecular imaging in the clinical arena.

Authors:  Farouc A Jaffer; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

6.  Neutron stimulated emission computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation approach.

Authors:  A C Sharma; B P Harrawood; J E Bender; G D Tourassi; A J Kapadia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Elevated trace element concentrations in malignant breast tissues.

Authors:  K H Ng; D A Bradley; L M Looi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Comparison between concentrations of trace elements in normal and neoplastic human breast tissue.

Authors:  S L Rizk; H H Sky-Peck
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Experimental detection of iron overload in liver through neutron stimulated emission spectroscopy.

Authors:  A J Kapadia; G D Tourassi; A C Sharma; A S Crowell; M R Kiser; C R Howell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Validation of a dose deposited by low-energy photons using GATE/GEANT4.

Authors:  C O Thiam; V Breton; D Donnarieix; B Habib; L Maigne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.