Literature DB >> 24876931

Sensitivity of osteoporosis screening guidelines for eventual hip fracture in older male veterans.

Juliessa M Pavon1, Linda L Sanders2, Richard Sloane3, Cathleen Colón-Emeric1.   

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether guideline-recommended clinical criteria to select men for osteoporosis screening provide significantly better sensitivity than the osteoporotic screening tool (OST) among men who later went on to have a hip fracture, and whether the sensitivity differs by race. This retrospective observational study uses data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Austin Automation Center. We identified 825 male veterans with hip fractures from 2007 to 2009. Clinical risk factors used as screening selection criteria were abstracted from five accepted guidelines. Outpatient encounters were examined for each subject to determine whether they would have met screening selection criteria for each guideline in the 5 years before their hip fracture event. Sensitivities for each guideline were compared with the OST, using McNemar's exact test. Sensitivities of Veterans Affairs Health Service Research and Development Services (VA HSR&D) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines were 77% and 82%, respectively, and were significantly better than the OST sensitivity of 72% (P<0.05). Sensitivities of American College of Physicians (ACP; 68%), VA Secretary's Letters (45%) and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (13%) were significantly worse than the OST sensitivity (P<0.001). The sensitivities of the VA HSR&D, ACP and NOF were significantly higher in Whites compared with non-Whites (76% vs 65%, P<0.01; 70% vs 58%, P<0.01; and 84% vs 70%, P<0.001, respectively). Only VA HSR&D and NOF clinical screening criteria are more sensitive than OST in identifying veterans who subsequently experience hip fractures, and these sensitivities vary by race.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876931      PMCID: PMC4037879          DOI: 10.1038/bonekey.2014.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bonekey Rep        ISSN: 2047-6396


  28 in total

1.  Screening for osteoporosis in men: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Paul Shekelle; Robert Hopkins; Mary Ann Forciea; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Physician and coding errors in patient records.

Authors:  S S Lloyd; J P Rissing
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Validation of OSTA among Filipinos.

Authors:  Julie T Li-Yu; Lyndon J Q Llamado; Tito P Torralba
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A comparison of hip fracture incidence among native Japanese, Japanese Americans, and American Caucasians.

Authors:  P D Ross; H Norimatsu; J W Davis; K Yano; R D Wasnich; S Fujiwara; Y Hosoda; L J Melton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Screening for osteoporosis in men: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians guideline.

Authors:  Hau Liu; Neil M Paige; Caroline L Goldzweig; Elaine Wong; Annie Zhou; Marika J Suttorp; Brett Munjas; Eric Orwoll; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Hip fracture incidence among elderly Hispanics.

Authors:  D S Lauderdale; S J Jacobsen; S E Furner; P S Levy; J A Brody; J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  An evaluation of osteoporosis screening tools for the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  H S Lynn; J Woo; P C Leung; E L Barrett-Connor; M C Nevitt; J A Cauley; R A Adler; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Utility of screening tools for the prediction of low bone mass in African American men.

Authors:  B Sinnott; S Kukreja; E Barengolts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Performance of clinical referral criteria for bone densitometry in patients under 65 years of age assessed by spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  K Kayan; D de Takats; R Ashford; J A Kanis; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

View more
  1 in total

1.  Beneficial effects of percutaneous minimally invasive surgery for patients with fractures in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yang Liu; Xinwei Wang; Huajiang Chen; Peng Cao; Ye Tian; Xiaoyu Wu; Yu Chen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.