Literature DB >> 18458282

Screening for osteoporosis in men: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians guideline.

Hau Liu1, Neil M Paige, Caroline L Goldzweig, Elaine Wong, Annie Zhou, Marika J Suttorp, Brett Munjas, Eric Orwoll, Paul Shekelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for low bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the primary way to identify asymptomatic men who might benefit from osteoporosis treatment. Identifying men at risk for low BMD and fracture can help clinicians determine which men should be tested.
PURPOSE: To identify which asymptomatic men should receive DXA BMD testing, this systematic review evaluates 1) risk factors for osteoporotic fracture in men that may be mediated through low BMD and 2) the performance of non-DXA tests in identifying men with low BMD. DATA SOURCES: Studies identified through the MEDLINE database (1990 to July 2007). STUDY SELECTION: Articles that assessed risk factors for osteoporotic fracture in men or evaluated a non-DXA screening test against a gold standard of DXA. DATA EXTRACTION: Researchers performed independent dual abstractions for each article, determined performance characteristics of screening tests, and assessed the quality of included articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: A published meta-analysis of 167 studies evaluating risk factors for low BMD-related fracture in men and women found high-risk factors to be increased age (>70 years), low body weight (body mass index <20 to 25 kg/m2), weight loss (>10%), physical inactivity, prolonged corticosteroid use, and previous osteoporotic fracture. An additional 102 studies assessing 15 other proposed risk factors were reviewed; most had insufficient evidence in men to draw conclusions. Twenty diagnostic study articles were reviewed. At a T-score threshold of -1.0, calcaneal ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 66% for identifying DXA-determined osteoporosis (DXA T-score, -2.5). At a risk score threshold of -1, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Screening Tool had a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 68% to identify DXA-determined osteoporosis. LIMITATION: Data on other screening tests, including radiography, and bone geometry variables, were sparse.
CONCLUSION: Key risk factors for low BMD-mediated fracture include increased age, low body weight, weight loss, physical inactivity, prolonged corticosteroid use, previous osteoporotic fracture, and androgen deprivation therapy. Non-DXA tests either are too insensitive or have insufficient data to reach conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18458282     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis of osteoporosis in geriatric patients - possibilities and limitations].

Authors:  Peter Mikosch
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 2.  Bone Density Screening and Re-screening in Postmenopausal Women and Older Men.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; Robert A Overman; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Elevated bone mass: a weighty matter?

Authors:  William D Leslie
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Prevalence of causes of secondary osteoporosis and contribution to lower bone mineral density in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  J L Casado; S Bañon; R Andrés; M J Perez-Elías; A Moreno; S Moreno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparison of DXA and CT in the assessment of body composition in premenopausal women with obesity and anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella; Reza Hosseini Ghomi; Bijoy J Thomas; Martin Torriani; Danielle J Brick; Anu V Gerweck; Madhusmita Misra; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Bone mineral density in hemophilia patients.

Authors:  Nader Roushan; Alipasha Meysamie; Mohammadreza Managhchi; Javad Esmaili; Tarane Dormohammadi
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 7.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  The patient who falls: "It's always a trade-off".

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Chandrika Kumar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The efficacy of calcitriol therapy in the management of bone loss and fractures: a qualitative review.

Authors:  L J Peppone; S Hebl; J Q Purnell; M E Reid; R N Rosier; K M Mustian; O G Palesh; A J Huston; M N Ling; G R Morrow
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Fracture prevention in men.

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Philip Sambrook; Willem Lems
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.