Literature DB >> 24876610

Design, development, and evaluation of a novel microneedle array-based continuous glucose monitor.

Arvind Jina1, Michael J Tierney2, Janet A Tamada2, Scott McGill2, Shashi Desai2, Beelee Chua2, Anna Chang3, Mark Christiansen4.   

Abstract

The development of accurate, minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has been the subject of much work by several groups, as it is believed that a less invasive and more user-friendly device will result in greater adoption of CGM by persons with insulin-dependent diabetes. This article presents the results of preliminary clinical studies in subjects with diabetes of a novel prototype microneedle-based continuous glucose monitor. In this device, an array of tiny hollow microneedles is applied into the epidermis from where glucose in interstitial fluid (ISF) is transported via passive diffusion to an amperometric glucose sensor external to the body. Comparison of 1396 paired device glucose measurements and fingerstick blood glucose readings for up to 72-hour wear in 10 diabetic subjects shows the device to be accurate and well tolerated by the subjects. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is 15% with 98.4% of paired points in the A+B region of the Clarke error grid. The prototype device has demonstrated clinically accurate glucose readings over 72 hours, the first time a microneedle-based device has achieved such performance.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous glucose; interstitial fluid; microneedle; minimally invasive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876610      PMCID: PMC4455438          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814526191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects.

Authors:  Eray Kulcu; Janet A Tamada; Gerard Reach; Russell O Potts; Matthew J Lesho
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  The development of minimally invasive continuous Metabolic Monitoring Technologies in the U.S. Army TMM Research Program.

Authors:  Carl G Hover; Todd Stedeford; Roy M Vigneulle
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Minimally invasive extraction of dermal interstitial fluid for glucose monitoring using microneedles.

Authors:  Ping M Wang; Megan Cornwell; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Prolonged use of continuous glucose monitors in children with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intensive multiple-daily injection therapy.

Authors:  Stuart Weinzimer; Dongyuan Xing; Michael Tansey; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Nelly Mauras; Tim Wysocki; Roy Beck; William Tamborlane; Katrina Ruedy
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  Clinical evaluation of a continuous minimally invasive glucose flux sensor placed over ultrasonically permeated skin.

Authors:  Han Chuang; Elizabeth Taylor; Thomas W Davison
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Effect of microneedle design on pain in human volunteers.

Authors:  Harvinder S Gill; Donald D Denson; Brett A Burris; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Current application of continuous glucose monitoring in the treatment of diabetes: pros and cons.

Authors:  Jeroen Hermanides; Moshe Phillip; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  35 in total

1.  Nonenzymatic determination of glucose at near neutral pH values based on the use of nafion and platinum black coated microneedle electrode array.

Authors:  Somasekhar R Chinnadayyala; Ilhwan Park; Sungbo Cho
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients After Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplantation.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Brandon M Nathan; Antoinette Moran; Ty B Dunn; Gregory J Beilman; Timothy L Pruett; Boris P Kovatchev; Melena D Bellin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Accessing analytes in biofluids for peripheral biochemical monitoring.

Authors:  Jason Heikenfeld; Andrew Jajack; Benjamin Feldman; Steve W Granger; Supriya Gaitonde; Gavi Begtrup; Benjamin A Katchman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Sampling interstitial fluid from human skin using a microneedle patch.

Authors:  Pradnya P Samant; Megan M Niedzwiecki; Nicholas Raviele; Vilinh Tran; Juan Mena-Lapaix; Douglas I Walker; Eric I Felner; Dean P Jones; Gary W Miller; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Optical surface plasmon resonance sensor modified by mutant glucose/galactose-binding protein for affinity detection of glucose molecules.

Authors:  Dachao Li; Jie Su; Jia Yang; Songlin Yu; Jingxin Zhang; Kexin Xu; Haixia Yu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Mechanisms of sampling interstitial fluid from skin using a microneedle patch.

Authors:  Pradnya P Samant; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Microfabrication and in Vivo Performance of a Microdialysis Probe with Embedded Membrane.

Authors:  Woong Hee Lee; Thitaphat Ngernsutivorakul; Omar S Mabrouk; Jenny-Marie T Wong; Colleen E Dugan; Samuel S Pappas; Hyeun Joong Yoon; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Microneedles for transdermal diagnostics: Recent advances and new horizons.

Authors:  Gui-Shi Liu; Yifei Kong; Yensheng Wang; Yunhan Luo; Xudong Fan; Xi Xie; Bo-Ru Yang; Mei X Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Nurul A Mohd Asarani; Andrew N Reynolds; Sara E Boucher; Martin de Bock; Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 10.  Non-transdermal microneedles for advanced drug delivery.

Authors:  KangJu Lee; Marcus J Goudie; Peyton Tebon; Wujin Sun; Zhimin Luo; Junmin Lee; Shiming Zhang; Kirsten Fetah; Han-Jun Kim; Yumeng Xue; Mohammad Ali Darabi; Samad Ahadian; Einollah Sarikhani; WonHyoung Ryu; Zhen Gu; Paul S Weiss; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Nureddin Ashammakhi; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.