OBJECTIVES: To design microneedles that minimize pain, this study tested the hypothesis that microneedles cause significantly less pain than a 26-gauge hypodermic needle, and that decreasing microneedle length and the number of microneedles reduces pain in normal human volunteers. METHODS: Single microneedles with lengths ranging from 480 to 1450 microm, widths from 160 to 465 microm, thicknesses from 30 to 100 microm, and tip angles from 20 to 90 degrees; and arrays containing 5 or 50 microneedles were inserted into the volar forearms of 10 healthy, human volunteers in a double-blinded, randomized study. Visual analog scale pain scores were recorded and compared with each other and to the pain from a 26-gauge hypodermic needle. RESULTS: All microneedles investigated were significantly less painful than the hypodermic needle with microneedle pain scores varying from 5% to 40% of the hypodermic needle. Microneedle length had the strongest effect on pain, where a 3-fold increase in length increased the pain score by 7-fold. The number of microneedles also affected the pain score, where a 10-fold increase in the number of microneedles increased pain just over 2-fold. Microneedle tip angle, thickness, and width did not significantly influence pain. DISCUSSION: Microneedles are significantly less painful than a 26-gauge hypodermic needle over the range of dimensions investigated. Decreasing microneedle length and number of microneedles reduces pain.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To design microneedles that minimize pain, this study tested the hypothesis that microneedles cause significantly less pain than a 26-gauge hypodermic needle, and that decreasing microneedle length and the number of microneedles reduces pain in normal human volunteers. METHODS: Single microneedles with lengths ranging from 480 to 1450 microm, widths from 160 to 465 microm, thicknesses from 30 to 100 microm, and tip angles from 20 to 90 degrees; and arrays containing 5 or 50 microneedles were inserted into the volar forearms of 10 healthy, human volunteers in a double-blinded, randomized study. Visual analog scale pain scores were recorded and compared with each other and to the pain from a 26-gauge hypodermic needle. RESULTS: All microneedles investigated were significantly less painful than the hypodermic needle with microneedle pain scores varying from 5% to 40% of the hypodermic needle. Microneedle length had the strongest effect on pain, where a 3-fold increase in length increased the pain score by 7-fold. The number of microneedles also affected the pain score, where a 10-fold increase in the number of microneedles increased pain just over 2-fold. Microneedle tip angle, thickness, and width did not significantly influence pain. DISCUSSION: Microneedles are significantly less painful than a 26-gauge hypodermic needle over the range of dimensions investigated. Decreasing microneedle length and number of microneedles reduces pain.
Authors: John A Mikszta; Jason B Alarcon; John M Brittingham; Diane E Sutter; Ronald J Pettis; Noel G Harvey Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Devin V McAllister; Ping M Wang; Shawn P Davis; Jung-Hwan Park; Paul J Canatella; Mark G Allen; Mark R Prausnitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wijaya Martanto; Shawn P Davis; Nicholas R Holiday; Jenny Wang; Harvinder S Gill; Mark R Prausnitz Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Siôn A Coulman; James C Birchall; Aneesh Alex; Marc Pearton; Bernd Hofer; Conor O'Mahony; Wolfgang Drexler; Boris Považay Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Emilio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Tycho J Speaker; Robyn P Hickerson; Ryan Spitler; Manuel A Flores; Devin Leake; Christopher H Contag; Roger L Kaspar Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Mehmet A Kosoglu; Robert L Hood; John H Rossmeisl; David C Grant; Yong Xu; John L Robertson; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Christopher G Rylander Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Seong-O Choi; Yeu Chun Kim; Jung-Hwan Park; Joshua Hutcheson; Harvinder S Gill; Yong-Kyu Yoon; Mark R Prausnitz; Mark G Allen Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.838