Literature DB >> 24876544

Validity and Reliability of a Glucometer Against Industry Reference Standards.

Amanda J Salacinski1, Micah Alford2, Kathryn Drevets2, Sarah Hart2, Brian E Hunt2.   

Abstract

As an appealing alternative to reference glucose analyzers, portable glucometers are recommended for self-monitoring at home, in the field, and in research settings. The purpose was to characterize the accuracy and precision, and bias of glucometers in biomedical research. Fifteen young (20-36 years; mean = 24.5), moderately to highly active men (n = 10) and women (n = 5), defined by exercising 2 to 3 times a week for the past 6 months, were given an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after an overnight fast. Participants ingested 50, 75, or 150 grams of glucose over a 5-minute period. The glucometer was compared to a reference instrument. The glucometer had 39% of values within 15% of measurements made using the reference instrument ranging from 45.05 to 169.37 mg/dl. There was both a proportional (-0.45 to -0.39) and small fixed (5.06 and 0.90 mg/dl) bias. Results of the present study suggest that the glucometer provided poor validity and reliability results compared to the results provided by the reference laboratory analyzer. The portable glucometers should be used for patient management, but not for diagnosis, treatment, or research purposes.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; bias; oral glucose tolerance test; reproducibility

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876544      PMCID: PMC4454112          DOI: 10.1177/1932296813514315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  Point-of-care glucose testing: effects of critical care variables, influence of reference instruments, and a modular glucose meter design.

Authors:  R F Louie; Z Tang; D V Sutton; J H Lee; G J Kost
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 2.  Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.557

3.  Tests of glycemia in diabetes.

Authors:  David E Goldstein; Randie R Little; Rodney A Lorenz; John I Malone; David M Nathan; Charles M Peterson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription.

Authors:  William J Kraemer; Nicholas A Ratamess
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Between-lot variation in external quality assessment of glucose: clinical importance and effect on participant performance evaluation.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Nina Gade Christensen; Geir Thue; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Bern Harrison; Cheryl Leazenby; Solveig Halldorsdottir
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 7.  Comparing methods of measurements.

Authors:  J Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.557

8.  Assuring the accuracy of home glucose monitoring.

Authors:  William A Alto; Daniel Meyer; James Schneid; Paul Bryson; Jon Kindig
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

9.  Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose (abbreviated).

Authors:  Paul D'Orazio; Robert W Burnett; Niels Fogh-Andersen; Ellis Jacobs; Katsuhiko Kuwa; Wolf R Külpmann; Lasse Larsson; Andrzej Lewenstam; Anton H J Maas; Gerhard Mager; Jerzy W Naskalski; Anthony O Okorodudu
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Comparison of the accuracy of the HemoCue glucose analyzer with the Yellow Springs Instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Alexander D M Stork; Hans Kemperman; D Willem Erkelens; Thiemo F Veneman
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.664

View more
  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of 5 Point-of-Care Glucometers in C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Linnea A Morley; Thomas H Gomez; Julia L Goldman; Rene Flores; Mary A Robinson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations".

Authors:  Gary H Thorpe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-15

3.  Cesarean delivery and metabolic risk factors in young adults: a Brazilian birth cohort study.

Authors:  Juliana Rombaldi Bernardi; Tanara Vogel Pinheiro; Noel Theodore Mueller; Helena Ayako Sueno Goldani; Manoel Romeu Pereira Gutierrez; Heloisa Bettiol; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva; Marco Antônio Barbieri; Marcelo Zubaran Goldani
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  A comparative assessment of the glucose monitor (SD Codefree) and auto analyzer (BT-3000) in measuring blood glucose concentration among diabetic patients.

Authors:  Osman Nabayire Kanwugu; Gideon Kofi Helegbe; Paul Armah Aryee; Nathaniel Amigamsa Akontatiba; Jacob Ankrah; Nsoh Godwin Anabire; Frank Anaba; Benjamin Ahenkora
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-09-06

5.  Development of a Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring System Prototype: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Maria Valero; Priyanka Pola; Oluwaseyi Falaiye; Katherine H Ingram; Liang Zhao; Hossain Shahriar; Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-08-26

6.  Glucose meters: What's the laboratory reference glucose?

Authors:  Mariarosa Carta; Davide Giavarina; Andreina Paternoster; Graziella Bonetti
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  A model for managing and monitoring the quality of glucometers used in a high-volume clinical setting.

Authors:  Güzin Aykal; Ayşenur Yegin; Özgür Tekeli; Necat Yilmaz
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.313

8.  The Investigation of the Effect of Hyperglycemic Changes on Psychophysical Measurements of Visual Function in Pseudophakic People Living with Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Lindokuhle Majola; Alvin J Munsamy
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-20

9.  Accuracy of Glucose Meter among Adults in a Semi-urban Area in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Authors:  Asmita Pokhrel; Vinutha Silvanus; Buddhi Raj Pokhrel; Binaya Baral; Madhav Khanal; Prajwal Gyawali; Laxman Pokhrel; Deepak Regmi
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.406

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.